Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Madhukar K. Reddy

dblp:63/4892 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1998
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Electronic design automation · 82% Integrated circuit design · 18%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test
0.021986
Testable Realizations for FET Stuck-Open Faults CMOS Combinational Logic Circuits · IEEE Trans. Computers 1986
Transistor level test generation for MOS circuits · DAC 1985
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › fault testing
stuck-open fault testing
0.011986
Testable Realizations for FET Stuck-Open Faults CMOS Combinational Logic Circuits · IEEE Trans. Computers 1986
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
test generation
0.011985
Transistor level test generation for MOS circuits · DAC 1985
Integrated circuit design › digital circuit design › combinational logic
CMOS combinational logic
0.011986
Testable Realizations for FET Stuck-Open Faults CMOS Combinational Logic Circuits · IEEE Trans. Computers 1986
Integrated circuit design
digital circuit design
0.011985
Transistor level test generation for MOS circuits · DAC 1985
Integrated circuit design › digital circuit design
MOS circuits
0.011985
Transistor level test generation for MOS circuits · DAC 1985

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

stuck-open fault model · 0.0delay analysis · 0.0charge distribution analysis · 0.0transistor-level simulation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1998 Partial and Perfect Path Covers of Cographs
David G. Kirkpatrick, Madhukar K. Reddy, C. Pandu Rangan, Anand Srinivasan
Discret. Appl. Math.2
1986 Testable Realizations for FET Stuck-Open Faults CMOS Combinational Logic Circuits
abstract
In this paper, potential invalidation of stuck-open fault-detecting tests, derived by neglecting circuit delays and charge distribution in CMOS logic circuits, is studied. Several classes of circuits derived from sum of products and product of sums expressions for a given combinational logic function are investigated to determine the testability of FET stuck-open faults by tests which will remain valid in the presence of arbitrary circuit delays. Necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of tests that will remain valid in the presence of arbitrary circuit delays are derived. Using these conditions, it is shown that all single FET stuck-open faults, in a specific design using a single CMOs complex gate, are detectable by tests that remain valid in the presence of arbitrary circuit delays. For several other realizations, methods to augment them, to insure detectability of all single FET stuck-open faults by tests that will remain valid in the presence of arbitrary circuit delays are proposed. It is observed that in many of the logic circuits investigated it is also possible to avoid test invalidation due to charge distribution.
Sudhakar M. Reddy, Madhukar K. Reddy
IEEE Trans. Computers2
1985 Transistor level test generation for MOS circuits
abstract
Due to inaccuracies in gate level models of VLSI digital circuits, current practice is to use transistor level simulators to analyze VLSI digital circuits. The inaccuracies of gate level models are even more severe when faults in digital circuits are considered. For this reason, recently several researchers have proposed the use of test pattern generation from digital circuits described at the transistor level. In this paper an efficient test pattern generation procedure for digital circuits described at the transistor level is given.
Madhukar K. Reddy, Sudhakar M. Reddy, Prathima Agrawal
DAC1