Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yingying Li 0005
dblp:63/5869-5
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
4as first author
6since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-1858-4257ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 4 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
6 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 92% Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 8% | |
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Learning paradigms · 47% Reinforcement learning · 25% Optimization for machine learning · 24% |
Topics — the 19 heaviest of 19, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization
online optimization |
2.0 | 4 | 2023 | Online Adaptive Policy Selection in Time-Varying Systems: No-Regret via Contractive Perturbations · NeurIPS 2023 Online Optimal Control with Affine Constraints · AAAI 2021 Leveraging Predictions in Smoothed Online Convex Optimization via Gradient-based Algorithms · NeurIPS 2020 |
Mathematical optimization › control theory › system identification
set membership estimation |
1.0 | 2 | 2024 | Learning the Uncertainty Sets of Linear Control Systems via Set Membership: A Non-asymptotic Analysis · ICML 2024 Identification of Analytic Nonlinear Dynamical Systems with Non-asymptotic Guarantees · NeurIPS 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › online optimization
online optimal control |
0.9 | 2 | 2021 | Online Optimal Control with Affine Constraints · AAAI 2021 Online Optimal Control with Linear Dynamics and Predictions: Algorithms and Regret Analysis · NeurIPS 2019 |
Mathematical optimization › convergence analysis
non-asymptotic analysis |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Learning the Uncertainty Sets of Linear Control Systems via Set Membership: A Non-asymptotic Analysis · ICML 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › control theory
robust control |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Learning the Uncertainty Sets of Linear Control Systems via Set Membership: A Non-asymptotic Analysis · ICML 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › control theory
system identification |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Learning the Uncertainty Sets of Linear Control Systems via Set Membership: A Non-asymptotic Analysis · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › continual learning
class-incremental learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Online Hyperparameter Optimization for Class-Incremental Learning · AAAI 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
hyperparameter optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Online Hyperparameter Optimization for Class-Incremental Learning · AAAI 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › continual learning
stability-plasticity trade-off |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Online Hyperparameter Optimization for Class-Incremental Learning · AAAI 2023 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
regret minimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Online Adaptive Policy Selection in Time-Varying Systems: No-Regret via Contractive Perturbations · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › regret minimization
policy regret |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Online Optimal Control with Affine Constraints · AAAI 2021 |
Mathematical optimization › online optimization
online convex optimization with switching cost |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Leveraging Predictions in Smoothed Online Convex Optimization via Gradient-based Algorithms · NeurIPS 2020 |
Mathematical optimization › online optimization › online convex optimization
smoothed online convex optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Leveraging Predictions in Smoothed Online Convex Optimization via Gradient-based Algorithms · NeurIPS 2020 |
Mathematical optimization › online optimization › online convex optimization
dynamic regret |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Online Optimal Control with Linear Dynamics and Predictions: Algorithms and Regret Analysis · NeurIPS 2019 |
Mathematical optimization › online optimization
regret bounds |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Online Optimal Control with Linear Dynamics and Predictions: Algorithms and Regret Analysis · NeurIPS 2019 |
Mathematical optimization
least squares |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Identification of Analytic Nonlinear Dynamical Systems with Non-asymptotic Guarantees · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
markov decision process |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Online Hyperparameter Optimization for Class-Incremental Learning · AAAI 2023 |
Mathematical optimization
constrained optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Online Optimal Control with Affine Constraints · AAAI 2021 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › optimal control
receding horizon control |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Online Optimal Control with Linear Dynamics and Predictions: Algorithms and Regret Analysis · NeurIPS 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
online gradient descent · 1.7set membership estimation · 1.5least-squares estimation · 1.5buffer zones · 1.0non-asymptotic convergence rates · 0.8gradient computation · 0.8convergence rate analysis · 0.8online MDP · 0.7knowledge distillation · 0.7exp3 bandit algorithm · 0.7contractive perturbation analysis · 0.7receding horizon inexact gradient · 0.4dynamic regret analysis · 0.4receding horizon control · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Learning the Uncertainty Sets of Linear Control Systems via Set Membership: A Non-asymptotic AnalysisabstractThis paper studies uncertainty set estimation for unknown linear systems. Uncertainty sets are crucial for the quality of robust control since they directly influence the conservativeness of the control design. Departing from the confidence region analysis of least squares estimation, this paper focuses on set membership estimation (SME). Though good numerical performances have attracted applications of SME in the control literature, the non-asymptotic convergence rate of SME for linear systems remains an open question. This paper provides the first convergence rate bounds for SME and discusses variations of SME under relaxed assumptions. We also provide numerical results demonstrating SME’s practical promise. Yingying Li 0005, Jing Yu 0010, Lauren E. Conger, Taylan Kargin, Adam Wierman |
ICML | 1 |
| 2024 | Identification of Analytic Nonlinear Dynamical Systems with Non-asymptotic GuaranteesabstractThis paper focuses on the system identification of an important class of nonlinear systems: nonlinear systems that are linearly parameterized, which enjoy wide applications in robotics and other mechanical systems. We consider two system identification methods: least-squares estimation (LSE), which is a point estimation method; and set-membership estimation (SME), which estimates an uncertainty set that contains the true parameters. We provide non-asymptotic convergence rates for LSE and SME under i.i.d. control inputs and control policies with i.i.d. random perturbations, both of which are considered as non-active-exploration inputs. Compared with the counter-example based on piecewise-affine systems in the literature, the success of non-active exploration in our setting relies on a key assumption about the system dynamics: we require the system functions to be real-analytic. Our results, together with the piecewise-affine counter-example, reveal the importance of differentiability in nonlinear system identification through non-active exploration. Lastly, we numerically compare our theoretical bounds with the empirical performance of LSE and SME on a pendulum example and a quadrotor example. Negin Musavi, Ziyao Guo, Geir E. Dullerud, Yingying Li 0005 |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2024 | Wakening Past Concepts without Past Data: Class-Incremental Learning from Online PlacebosabstractNot forgetting old class knowledge is a key challenge for class-incremental learning (CIL) when the model continuously adapts to new classes. A common technique to address this is knowledge distillation (KD), which penalizes prediction inconsistencies between old and new models. Such prediction is made with almost new class data, as old class data is extremely scarce due to the strict memory limitation in CIL. In this paper, we take a deep dive into KD losses and find that "using new class data for KD" not only hinders the model adaption (for learning new classes) but also results in low efficiency for preserving old class knowledge. We address this by "using the placebos of old classes for KD", where the placebos are chosen from a free image stream, such as Google Images, in an automatical and economical fashion. To this end, we train an online placebo selection policy to quickly evaluate the quality of streaming images (good or bad placebos) and use only good ones for one-time feed-forward computation of KD. We formulate the policy training process as an online Markov Decision Process (MDP), and introduce an online learning algorithm to solve this MDP problem without causing much computation costs. In experiments, we show that our method 1) is surprisingly effective even when there is no class overlap between placebos and original old class data, 2) does not require any additional supervision or memory budget, and 3) significantly outperforms a number of top-performing CIL methods, in particular when using lower memory budgets for old class exemplars, e.g., five exemplars per class.1 Yaoyao Liu 0001, Yingying Li 0005, Bernt Schiele, Qianru Sun |
WACV | 2 |
| 2023 | Online Hyperparameter Optimization for Class-Incremental LearningabstractClass-incremental learning (CIL) aims to train a classification model while the number of classes increases phase-by-phase. An inherent challenge of CIL is the stability-plasticity tradeoff, i.e., CIL models should keep stable to retain old knowledge and keep plastic to absorb new knowledge. However, none of the existing CIL models can achieve the optimal tradeoff in different data-receiving settings—where typically the training-from-half (TFH) setting needs more stability, but the training-from-scratch (TFS) needs more plasticity. To this end, we design an online learning method that can adaptively optimize the tradeoff without knowing the setting as a priori. Specifically, we first introduce the key hyperparameters that influence the tradeoff, e.g., knowledge distillation (KD) loss weights, learning rates, and classifier types. Then, we formulate the hyperparameter optimization process as an online Markov Decision Process (MDP) problem and propose a specific algorithm to solve it. We apply local estimated rewards and a classic bandit algorithm Exp3 to address the issues when applying online MDP methods to the CIL protocol. Our method consistently improves top-performing CIL methods in both TFH and TFS settings, e.g., boosting the average accuracy of TFH and TFS by 2.2 percentage points on ImageNet-Full, compared to the state-of-the-art. Code is provided at https://class-il.mpi-inf.mpg.de/online/ Yaoyao Liu 0001, Yingying Li 0005, Bernt Schiele, Qianru Sun |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2023 | Online Adaptive Policy Selection in Time-Varying Systems: No-Regret via Contractive PerturbationsabstractWe study online adaptive policy selection in systems with time-varying costs and dynamics. We develop the Gradient-based Adaptive Policy Selection (GAPS) algorithm together with a general analytical framework for online policy selection via online optimization. Under our proposed notion of contractive policy classes, we show that GAPS approximates the behavior of an ideal online gradient descent algorithm on the policy parameters while requiring less information and computation. When convexity holds, our algorithm is the first to achieve optimal policy regret. When convexity does not hold, we provide the first local regret bound for online policy selection. Our numerical experiments show that GAPS can adapt to changing environments more quickly than existing benchmarks. Yiheng Lin 0001, James A. Preiss, Emile Anand, Yingying Li 0005, Yisong Yue, Adam Wierman |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2021 | Online Optimal Control with Affine ConstraintsabstractThis paper considers online optimal control with affine constraints on the states and actions under linear dynamics with bounded random disturbances. The system dynamics and constraints are assumed to be known and time invariant but the convex stage cost functions change adversarially. To solve this problem, we propose Online Gradient Descent with Buffer Zones (OGD-BZ). Theoretically, we show that OGD-BZ with proper parameters can guarantee the system to satisfy all the constraints despite any admissible disturbances. Further, we investigate the policy regret of OGD-BZ, which compares OGD-BZ's performance with the performance of the optimal linear policy in hindsight. We show that OGD-BZ can achieve a policy regret upper bound that is square root of the horizon length multiplied by some logarithmic terms of the horizon length under proper algorithm parameters. Yingying Li 0005, Subhro Das, Na Li 0002 |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2020 | Leveraging Predictions in Smoothed Online Convex Optimization via Gradient-based AlgorithmsabstractWe consider online convex optimization with time-varying stage costs and additional switching costs. Since the switching costs introduce coupling across all stages, multi-step-ahead (long-term) predictions are incorporated to improve the online performance. However, longer-term predictions tend to suffer from lower quality. Thus, a critical question is: how to reduce the impact of long-term prediction errors on the online performance? To address this question, we introduce a gradient-based online algorithm, Receding Horizon Inexact Gradient (RHIG), and analyze its performance by dynamic regrets in terms of the temporal variation of the environment and the prediction errors. RHIG only considers at most $W$-step-ahead predictions to avoid being misled by worse predictions in the longer term. The optimal choice of $W$ suggested by our regret bounds depends on the tradeoff between the variation of the environment and the prediction accuracy. Additionally, we apply RHIG to a well-established stochastic prediction error model and provide expected regret and concentration bounds under correlated prediction errors. Lastly, we numerically test the performance of RHIG on quadrotor tracking problems. Yingying Li 0005, Na Li 0002 |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2019 | Online Optimal Control with Linear Dynamics and Predictions: Algorithms and Regret AnalysisabstractThis paper studies the online optimal control problem with time-varying convex stage costs for a time-invariant linear dynamical system, where a finite lookahead window of accurate predictions of the stage costs are available at each time. We design online algorithms, Receding Horizon Gradient-based Control (RHGC), that utilize the predictions through finite steps of gradient computations. We study the algorithm performance measured by dynamic regret: the online performance minus the optimal performance in hindsight. It is shown that the dynamic regret of RHGC decays exponentially with the size of the lookahead window. In addition, we provide a fundamental limit of the dynamic regret for any online algorithms by considering linear quadratic tracking problems. The regret upper bound of one RHGC method almost reaches the fundamental limit, demonstrating the effectiveness of the algorithm. Finally, we numerically test our algorithms for both linear and nonlinear systems to show the effectiveness and generality of our RHGC. Yingying Li 0005, Xin Chen 0036, Na Li 0002 |
NeurIPS | 1 |