Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mathieu Tracol

dblp:63/6753 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 6 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Automata and formal languages · 69% Automated reasoning and model checking · 10% Mathematical optimization · 10%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Automata and formal languages
probabilistic automata
0.222012
Decidable Problems for Probabilistic Automata on Infinite Words · LICS 2012
Statistic Analysis for Probabilistic Processes · LICS 2009
Automata and formal languages
infinite words
0.112012
Decidable Problems for Probabilistic Automata on Infinite Words · LICS 2012
Automata and formal languages › omega-automata
parity conditions
0.112012
Decidable Problems for Probabilistic Automata on Infinite Words · LICS 2012
Automata and formal languages
equivalence problem
0.112009
Statistic Analysis for Probabilistic Processes · LICS 2009
Mathematical optimization › sequential decision making
markov decision processes
0.112009
Statistic Analysis for Probabilistic Processes · LICS 2009
Computational complexity › decision problems
membership problem
0.112009
Statistic Analysis for Probabilistic Processes · LICS 2009
Automated reasoning and model checking
probabilistic verification
0.112009
Statistic Analysis for Probabilistic Processes · LICS 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

qualitative decision problems · 0.1PSPACE-completeness · 0.1tail sigma-field · 0.1statistical analysis · 0.1geometric embedding · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 What is decidable about partially observable Markov decision processes with ω-regular objectives
Krishnendu Chatterjee, Martin Chmelik, Mathieu Tracol
J. Comput. Syst. Sci.3
2013 What is Decidable about Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes with omega-Regular Objectives
abstract
We consider partially observable Markov decision processes (POMDPs) with omega-regular conditions specified as parity objectives. The qualitative analysis problem given a POMDP and a parity objective asks whether there is a strategy to ensure that the objective is satisfied with probability 1 (resp. positive probability). While the qualitative analysis problems are known to be undecidable even for very special cases of parity objectives, we establish decidability (with optimal EXPTIME-complete complexity) of the qualitative analysis problems for POMDPs with all parity objectives under finite-memory strategies. We also establish optimal (exponential) memory bounds.
Krishnendu Chatterjee, Martin Chmelik, Mathieu Tracol
CSL3
2012 Decidable Problems for Probabilistic Automata on Infinite Words
abstract
We consider probabilistic automata on infinite words with acceptance defined by parity conditions. We consider three qualitative decision problems: (i) the positive decision problem asks whether there is a word that is accepted with positive probability; (ii) the almost decision problem asks whether there is a word that is accepted with probability 1; and (iii) the limit decision problem asks whether words are accepted with probability arbitrarily close to 1. We unify and generalize several decidability results for probabilistic automata over infinite words, and identify a robust (closed under union and intersection) subclass of probabilistic automata for which all the qualitative decision problems are decidable for parity conditions. We also show that if the input words are restricted to lasso shape (regular) words, then the positive and almost problems are decidable for all probabilistic automata with parity conditions. For most decidable problems we show an optimal PSPACE-complete complexity bound.
Krishnendu Chatterjee, Mathieu Tracol
LICS2
2011 Recurrence and transience for finite probabilistic tables
Mathieu Tracol
Theor. Comput. Sci.1
2009 Recurrence and Transience for Probabilistic Automata
abstract
In a context of $\omega$-regular specifications for infinite execution sequences, the classical B\"uchi condition, or repeated liveness condition, asks that an accepting state is visited infinitely often. In this paper, we show that in a probabilistic context it is relevant to strengthen this infinitely often condition. An execution path is now accepting if the \emph{proportion} of time spent on an accepting state does not go to zero as the length of the path goes to infinity. We introduce associated notions of recurrence and transience for non-homogeneous finite Markov chains and study the computational complexity of the associated problems. As Probabilistic B\"uchi Automata (PBA) have been an attempt to generalize B\"uchi automata to a probabilistic context, we define a class of Constrained Probabilistic Automata with our new accepting condition on runs. The accepted language is defined by the requirement that the measure of the set of accepting runs is positive (probable semantics) or equals 1 (almost-sure semantics). In contrast to the PBA case, we prove that the emptiness problem for the language of a constrained probabilistic B\"uchi automaton with the probable semantics is decidable.
Mathieu Tracol, Christel Baier, Marcus Größer
FSTTCS1
2009 Statistic Analysis for Probabilistic Processes
abstract
We associate a statistical vector to a trace and a geometrical embedding to a Markov decision process, based on a distance on words, and study basic membership and equivalence problems. The membership problem for a trace w and a Markov decision process S decides if there exists a strategy on S which generates with high probability traces close to w. We prove that membership of a trace is testable and equivalence of MDPs is polynomial time approximable. For probabilistic automata, membership is not testable, and approximate equivalence is undecidable. We give a class of properties, based on results concerning the structure of the tail sigma-field of a finite Markov chain, which characterizes equivalent Markov decision processes in this context.
Michel de Rougemont, Mathieu Tracol
LICS2