Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Kevin Winner

dblp:63/7635 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 90% Deep learning architectures and training · 10%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model
1.142018
Learning in Integer Latent Variable Models with Nested Automatic Differentiation · ICML 2018
Exact Inference for Integer Latent-Variable Models · ICML 2017
Probabilistic Inference with Generating Functions for Poisson Latent Variable Models · NIPS 2016
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
exact inference
0.522017
Exact Inference for Integer Latent-Variable Models · ICML 2017
Probabilistic Inference with Generating Functions for Poisson Latent Variable Models · NIPS 2016
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models
0.522017
Exact Inference for Integer Latent-Variable Models · ICML 2017
Probabilistic Inference with Generating Functions for Poisson Latent Variable Models · NIPS 2016
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
automatic differentiation
0.312018
Learning in Integer Latent Variable Models with Nested Automatic Differentiation · ICML 2018
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › markov chain monte carlo
gibbs sampling
0.212015
Inference in a Partially Observed Queuing Model with Applications in Ecology · ICML 2015
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
markov chain monte carlo
0.212015
Inference in a Partially Observed Queuing Model with Applications in Ecology · ICML 2015
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
statistical inference
0.212015
Inference in a Partially Observed Queuing Model with Applications in Ecology · ICML 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

probability generating function · 0.6automatic differentiation · 0.6nested high-order derivatives · 0.3variable elimination · 0.2generating functions · 0.2queueing model · 0.2markov basis · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Species Distribution Modeling for Machine Learning Practitioners: A Review
abstract
Conservation science depends on an accurate understanding of what’s happening in a given ecosystem. How many species live there? What is the makeup of the population? How is that changing over time? Species Distribution Modeling (SDM) seeks to predict the spatial (and sometimes temporal) patterns of species occurrence, i.e. where a species is likely to be found. The last few years have seen a surge of interest in applying powerful machine learning tools to challenging problems in ecology [2, 5, 8]. Despite its considerable importance, SDM has received relatively little attention from the computer science community. Our goal in this work is to provide computer scientists with the necessary background to read the SDM literature and develop ecologically useful ML-based SDM algorithms. In particular, we introduce key SDM concepts and terminology, review standard models, discuss data availability, and highlight technical challenges and pitfalls.
Sara Beery, Elijah Cole, Joseph Parker, Pietro Perona, Kevin Winner
COMPASS5
2018 Learning in Integer Latent Variable Models with Nested Automatic Differentiation
abstract
We develop nested automatic differentiation (AD) algorithms for exact inference and learning in integer latent variable models. Recently, Winner, Sujono, and Sheldon showed how to reduce marginalization in a class of integer latent variable models to evaluating a probability generating function which contains many levels of nested high-order derivatives. We contribute faster and more stable AD algorithms for this challenging problem and a novel algorithm to compute exact gradients for learning. These contributions lead to significantly faster and more accurate learning algorithms, and are the first AD algorithms whose running time is polynomial in the number of levels of nesting.
Daniel Sheldon, Kevin Winner, Debora Sujono
ICML2
2017 Exact Inference for Integer Latent-Variable Models
abstract
Graphical models with latent count variables arise in a number of areas. However, standard inference algorithms do not apply to these models due to the infinite support of the latent variables. Winner and Sheldon (2016) recently developed a new technique using probability generating functions (PGFs) to perform efficient, exact inference for certain Poisson latent variable models. However, the method relies on symbolic manipulation of PGFs, and it is unclear whether this can be extended to more general models. In this paper we introduce a new approach for inference with PGFs: instead of manipulating PGFs symbolically, we adapt techniques from the autodiff literature to compute the higher-order derivatives necessary for inference. This substantially generalizes the class of models for which efficient, exact inference algorithms are available. Specifically, our results apply to a class of models that includes branching processes, which are widely used in applied mathematics and population ecology, and autoregressive models for integer data. Experiments show that our techniques are more scalable than existing approximate methods and enable new applications.
Kevin Winner, Debora Sujono, Daniel Sheldon
ICML1
2016 Probabilistic Inference with Generating Functions for Poisson Latent Variable Models
abstract
Graphical models with latent count variables arise in a number of fields. Standard exact inference techniques such as variable elimination and belief propagation do not apply to these models because the latent variables have countably infinite support. As a result, approximations such as truncation or MCMC are employed. We present the first exact inference algorithms for a class of models with latent count variables by developing a novel representation of countably infinite factors as probability generating functions, and then performing variable elimination with generating functions. Our approach is exact, runs in pseudo-polynomial time, and is much faster than existing approximate techniques. It leads to better parameter estimates for problems in population ecology by avoiding error introduced by approximate likelihood computations.
Kevin Winner, Daniel Sheldon
NIPS1
2015 Inference in a Partially Observed Queuing Model with Applications in Ecology
abstract
We consider the problem of inference in a probabilistic model for transient populations where we wish to learn about arrivals, departures, and population size over all time, but the only available data are periodic counts of the population size at specific observation times. The underlying model arises in queueing theory (as an M/G/inf queue) and also in ecological models for short-lived animals such as insects. Our work applies to both systems. Previous work in the ecology literature focused on maximum likelihood estimation and made a simplifying independence assumption that prevents inference over unobserved random variables such as arrivals and departures. The contribution of this paper is to formulate a latent variable model and develop a novel Gibbs sampler based on Markov bases to perform inference using the correct, but intractable, likelihood function. We empirically validate the convergence behavior of our sampler and demonstrate the ability of our model to make much finer-grained inferences than the previous approach.
Kevin Winner, Garrett Bernstein, Daniel Sheldon
ICML1