Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Johanni Brea
dblp:64/11107
· DBLP profile ↗
14ranked-venue papers
3as first author
7since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-4636-0891ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 11 · 1 first-author · 7 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
8 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 46% Learning theory · 21% Representation and self-supervised learning · 13% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 21 heaviest of 21, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
loss landscape |
1.4 | 2 | 2025 | Flat Channels to Infinity in Neural Loss Landscapes · NeurIPS 2025 Geometry of the Loss Landscape in Overparameterized Neural Networks: Symmetries and Invariances · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
gradient flow |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Flat Channels to Infinity in Neural Loss Landscapes · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › training dynamics
optimization dynamics |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Flat Channels to Infinity in Neural Loss Landscapes · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › causal representation learning
identifiability |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Expand-and-Cluster: Parameter Recovery of Neural Networks · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › neural network theory
neural network analysis |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Expand-and-Cluster: Parameter Recovery of Neural Networks · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation
parameter recovery |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Expand-and-Cluster: Parameter Recovery of Neural Networks · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › approximation theory
neural network approximation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Should Under-parameterized Student Networks Copy or Average Teacher Weights? · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
teacher-student framework |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Should Under-parameterized Student Networks Copy or Average Teacher Weights? · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
associative memory |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Kernel Memory Networks: A Unifying Framework for Memory Modeling · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › recurrent neural network
hopfield network |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Kernel Memory Networks: A Unifying Framework for Memory Modeling · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › parameter estimation
likelihood estimation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Fitting summary statistics of neural data with a differentiable spiking network simulator · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
overparameterized neural network |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Geometry of the Loss Landscape in Overparameterized Neural Networks: Symmetries and Invariances · ICML 2021 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
computational neuroscience |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Fitting summary statistics of neural data with a differentiable spiking network simulator · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-based reinforcement learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Efficient ModelBased Deep Reinforcement Learning with Variational State Tabulation · ICML 2018 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
neural network expressivity |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Flat Channels to Infinity in Neural Loss Landscapes · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
non-convex optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Geometry of the Loss Landscape in Overparameterized Neural Networks: Symmetries and Invariances · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
sequence modeling |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Sequence learning with hidden units in spiking neural networks · NIPS 2011 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › spiking neural network
spike-timing-dependent plasticity |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Sequence learning with hidden units in spiking neural networks · NIPS 2011 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
spiking neural network |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Sequence learning with hidden units in spiking neural networks · NIPS 2011 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › biologically plausible learning
synaptic plasticity |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Sequence learning with hidden units in spiking neural networks · NIPS 2011 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
sample efficiency |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Efficient ModelBased Deep Reinforcement Learning with Variational State Tabulation · ICML 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
gradient flow analysis · 0.9adam · 0.9SGD · 0.9overparameterized student networks · 0.8clustering · 0.8gradient flow · 0.7constrained optimization · 0.7minimum weight norm · 0.6kernel interpolation · 0.6kernel classification · 0.6summary statistics · 0.5generalized linear model · 0.5backpropagation · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Flat Channels to Infinity in Neural Loss LandscapesabstractThe loss landscapes of neural networks contain minima and saddle points that may be connected in flat regions or appear in isolation. We identify and characterize a special structure in the loss landscape: channels along which the loss decreases extremely slowly, while the output weights of at least two neurons, $a_i$ and $a_j$, diverge to $\pm$infinity, and their input weight vectors, $\mathbf{w_i}$ and $\mathbf{w_j}$, become equal to each other. At convergence, the two neurons implement a gated linear unit: $a_i\sigma(\mathbf{w_i} \cdot \mathbf{x}) + a_j\sigma(\mathbf{w_j} \cdot \mathbf{x}) \rightarrow c \sigma(\mathbf{w} \cdot \mathbf{x}) + (\mathbf{v} \cdot \mathbf{x}) \sigma'(\mathbf{w} \cdot \mathbf{x})$. Geometrically, these channels to infinity are asymptotically parallel to symmetry-induced lines of critical points. Gradient flow solvers, and related optimization methods like SGD or ADAM, reach the channels with high probability in diverse regression settings, but without careful inspection they look like flat local minima with finite parameter values. Our characterization provides a comprehensive picture of this quasi-flat region in terms of gradient dynamics, geometry, and functional interpretation. The emergence of gated linear units at the end of the channels highlights a surprising aspect of the computational capabilities of fully connected layers. Flavio Martinelli, Alexander van Meegen, Berfin Simsek, Wulfram Gerstner, Johanni Brea |
NeurIPS | 5 |
| 2024 | Expand-and-Cluster: Parameter Recovery of Neural NetworksabstractCan we identify the weights of a neural network by probing its input-output mapping? At first glance, this problem seems to have many solutions because of permutation, overparameterisation and activation function symmetries. Yet, we show that the incoming weight vector of each neuron is identifiable up to sign or scaling, depending on the activation function. Our novel method ’Expand-and-Cluster’ can identify layer sizes and weights of a target network for all commonly used activation functions. Expand-and-Cluster consists of two phases: (i) to relax the non-convex optimisation problem, we train multiple overparameterised student networks to best imitate the target function; (ii) to reverse engineer the target network’s weights, we employ an ad-hoc clustering procedure that reveals the learnt weight vectors shared between students – these correspond to the target weight vectors. We demonstrate successful weights and size recovery of trained shallow and deep networks with less than 10% overhead in the layer size and describe an ’ease-of-identifiability’ axis by analysing 150 synthetic problems of variable difficulty. Flavio Martinelli, Berfin Simsek, Wulfram Gerstner, Johanni Brea |
ICML | 4 |
| 2023 | Should Under-parameterized Student Networks Copy or Average Teacher Weights?abstractAny continuous function $f^*$ can be approximated arbitrarily well by a neural network with sufficiently many neurons $k$. We consider the case when $f^*$ itself is a neural network with one hidden layer and $k$ neurons. Approximating $f^*$ with a neural network with $n< k$ neurons can thus be seen as fitting an under-parameterized "student" network with $n$ neurons to a "teacher" network with $k$ neurons. As the student has fewer neurons than the teacher, it is unclear, whether each of the $n$ student neurons should copy one of the teacher neurons or rather average a group of teacher neurons. For shallow neural networks with erf activation function and for the standard Gaussian input distribution, we prove that "copy-average" configurations are critical points if the teacher's incoming vectors are orthonormal and its outgoing weights are unitary. Moreover, the optimum among such configurations is reached when $n-1$ student neurons each copy one teacher neuron and the $n$-th student neuron averages the remaining $k-n+1$ teacher neurons. For the student network with $n=1$ neuron, we provide additionally a closed-form solution of the non-trivial critical point(s) for commonly used activation functions through solving an equivalent constrained optimization problem. Empirically, we find for the erf activation function that gradient flow converges either to the optimal copy-average critical point or to another point where each student neuron approximately copies a different teacher neuron. Finally, we find similar results for the ReLU activation function, suggesting that the optimal solution of underparameterized networks has a universal structure. Berfin Simsek, Amire Bendjeddou, Wulfram Gerstner, Johanni Brea |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2022 | Kernel Memory Networks: A Unifying Framework for Memory ModelingabstractWe consider the problem of training a neural network to store a set of patterns with maximal noise robustness. A solution, in terms of optimal weights and state update rules, is derived by training each individual neuron to perform either kernel classification or interpolation with a minimum weight norm. By applying this method to feed-forward and recurrent networks, we derive optimal models, termed kernel memory networks, that include, as special cases, many of the hetero- and auto-associative memory models that have been proposed over the past years, such as modern Hopfield networks and Kanerva's sparse distributed memory. We modify Kanerva's model and demonstrate a simple way to design a kernel memory network that can store an exponential number of continuous-valued patterns with a finite basin of attraction. The framework of kernel memory networks offers a simple and intuitive way to understand the storage capacity of previous memory models, and allows for new biological interpretations in terms of dendritic non-linearities and synaptic cross-talk. Georgios Iatropoulos, Johanni Brea, Wulfram Gerstner |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2021 | Geometry of the Loss Landscape in Overparameterized Neural Networks: Symmetries and InvariancesabstractWe study how permutation symmetries in overparameterized multi-layer neural networks generate ‘symmetry-induced’ critical points. Assuming a network with $ L $ layers of minimal widths $ r_1^*, \ldots, r_{L-1}^* $ reaches a zero-loss minimum at $ r_1^*! \cdots r_{L-1}^*! $ isolated points that are permutations of one another, we show that adding one extra neuron to each layer is sufficient to connect all these previously discrete minima into a single manifold. For a two-layer overparameterized network of width $ r^*+ h =: m $ we explicitly describe the manifold of global minima: it consists of $ T(r^*, m) $ affine subspaces of dimension at least $ h $ that are connected to one another. For a network of width $m$, we identify the number $G(r,m)$ of affine subspaces containing only symmetry-induced critical points that are related to the critical points of a smaller network of width $r Cite this Paper BibTeX @InProceedings{pmlr-v139-simsek21a, title = {Geometry of the Loss Landscape in Overparameterized Neural Networks: Symmetries and Invariances}, author = {Simsek, Berfin and Ged, Fran{\c{c}}ois and Jacot, Arthur and Spadaro, Francesco and Hongler, Clement and Gerstner, Wulfram and Brea, Johanni}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning}, pages = {9722--9732}, year = {2021}, editor = {Meila, Marina and Zhang, Tong}, volume = {139}, series = {Proceedings of Machine Learning Research}, month = {18--24 Jul}, publisher = {PMLR}, pdf = {http://proceedings.mlr.press/v139/simsek21a/simsek21a.pdf}, url = {https://proceedings.mlr.press/v139/simsek21a.html}, abstract = {We study how permutation symmetries in overparameterized multi-layer neural networks generate ‘symmetry-induced’ critical points. Assuming a network with $ L $ layers of minimal widths $ r_1^*, \ldots, r_{L-1}^* $ reaches a zero-loss minimum at $ r_1^*! \cdots r_{L-1}^*! $ isolated points that are permutations of one another, we show that adding one extra neuron to each layer is sufficient to connect all these previously discrete minima into a single manifold. For a two-layer overparameterized network of width $ r^*+ h =: m $ we explicitly describe the manifold of global minima: it consists of $ T(r^*, m) $ affine subspaces of dimension at least $ h $ that are connected to one another. For a network of width $m$, we identify the number $G(r,m)$ of affine subspaces containing only symmetry-induced critical points that are related to the critical points of a smaller network of width $r Copy to Clipboard Download Endnote %0 Conference Paper %T Geometry of the Loss Landscape in Overparameterized Neural Networks: Symmetries and Invariances %A Berfin Simsek %A François Ged %A Arthur Jacot %A Francesco Spadaro %A Clement Hongler %A Wulfram Gerstner %A Johanni Brea %B Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning %C Proceedings of Machine Learning Research %D 2021 %E Marina Meila %E Tong Zhang %F pmlr-v139-simsek21a %I PMLR %P 9722--9732 %U https://proceedings.mlr.press/v139/simsek21a.html %V 139 %X We study how permutation symmetries in overparameterized multi-layer neural networks generate ‘symmetry-induced’ critical points. Assuming a network with $ L $ layers of minimal widths $ r_1^*, \ldots, r_{L-1}^* $ reaches a zero-loss minimum at $ r_1^*! \cdots r_{L-1}^*! $ isolated points that are permutations of one another, we show that adding one extra neuron to each layer is sufficient to connect all these previously discrete minima into a single manifold. For a two-layer overparameterized network of width $ r^*+ h =: m $ we explicitly describe the manifold of global minima: it consists of $ T(r^*, m) $ affine subspaces of dimension at least $ h $ that are connected to one another. For a network of width $m$, we identify the number $G(r,m)$ of affine subspaces containing only symmetry-induced critical points that are related to the critical points of a smaller network of width $r Copy to Clipboard Download APA Simsek, B., Ged, F., Jacot, A., Spadaro, F., Hongler, C., Gerstner, W. & Brea, J.. (2021). Geometry of the Loss Landscape in Overparameterized Neural Networks: Symmetries and Invariances. Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning, in Proceedings of Machine Learning Research 139:9722-9732 Available from https://proceedings.mlr.press/v139/simsek21a.html. Copy to Clipboard Download Related Material Download PDF Supplementary PDF This site last compiled Sun, 05 Jul 2026 14:53:09 +0000 Github Account Copyright © The authors and PMLR 2026. MLResearchPress Berfin Simsek, François Ged, Arthur Jacot, Francesco Spadaro, Clément Hongler, Wulfram Gerstner, Johanni Brea |
ICML | 7 |
| 2021 | Fitting summary statistics of neural data with a differentiable spiking network simulatorabstractFitting network models to neural activity is an important tool in neuroscience. A popular approach is to model a brain area with a probabilistic recurrent spiking network whose parameters maximize the likelihood of the recorded activity. Although this is widely used, we show that the resulting model does not produce realistic neural activity. To correct for this, we suggest to augment the log-likelihood with terms that measure the dissimilarity between simulated and recorded activity. This dissimilarity is defined via summary statistics commonly used in neuroscience and the optimization is efficient because it relies on back-propagation through the stochastically simulated spike trains. We analyze this method theoretically and show empirically that it generates more realistic activity statistics. We find that it improves upon other fitting algorithms for spiking network models like GLMs (Generalized Linear Models) which do not usually rely on back-propagation. This new fitting algorithm also enables the consideration of hidden neurons which is otherwise notoriously hard, and we show that it can be crucial when trying to infer the network connectivity from spike recordings. Guillaume Bellec, Alireza Modirshanechi, Johanni Brea, Wulfram Gerstner |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2021 | Learning in Volatile Environments With the Bayes Factor SurpriseabstractSurprise-based learning allows agents to rapidly adapt to nonstationary stochastic environments characterized by sudden changes. We show that exact Bayesian inference in a hierarchical model gives rise to a surprise-modulated trade-off between forgetting old observations and integrating them with the new ones. The modulation depends on a probability ratio, which we call the Bayes Factor Surprise, that tests the prior belief against the current belief. We demonstrate that in several existing approximate algorithms, the Bayes Factor Surprise modulates the rate of adaptation to new observations. We derive three novel surprise-based algorithms, one in the family of particle filters, one in the family of variational learning, and one in the family of message passing, that have constant scaling in observation sequence length and particularly simple update dynamics for any distribution in the exponential family. Empirical results show that these surprise-based algorithms estimate parameters better than alternative approximate approaches and reach levels of performance comparable to computationally more expensive algorithms. The Bayes Factor Surprise is related to but different from the Shannon Surprise. In two hypothetical experiments, we make testable predictions for physiological indicators that dissociate the Bayes Factor Surprise from the Shannon Surprise. The theoretical insight of casting various approaches as surprise-based learning, as well as the proposed online algorithms, may be applied to the analysis of animal and human behavior and to reinforcement learning in nonstationary environments. Vasiliki Liakoni, Alireza Modirshanechi, Wulfram Gerstner, Johanni Brea |
Neural Comput. | 4 |
| 2020 | On the choice of metric in gradient-based theories of brain functionabstractThis is a PLOS Computational Biology Education paper. The idea that the brain functions so as to minimize certain costs pervades theoretical neuroscience. Because a cost function by itself does not predict how the brain finds its minima, additional assumptions about the optimization method need to be made to predict the dynamics of physiological quantities. In this context, steepest descent (also called gradient descent) is often suggested as an algorithmic principle of optimization potentially implemented by the brain. In practice, researchers often consider the vector of partial derivatives as the gradient. However, the definition of the gradient and the notion of a steepest direction depend on the choice of a metric. Because the choice of the metric involves a large number of degrees of freedom, the predictive power of models that are based on gradient descent must be called into question, unless there are strong constraints on the choice of the metric. Here, we provide a didactic review of the mathematics of gradient descent, illustrate common pitfalls of using gradient descent as a principle of brain function with examples from the literature, and propose ways forward to constrain the metric. Simone Carlo Surace, Jean-Pascal Pfister, Wulfram Gerstner, Johanni Brea |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 4 |
| 2019 | Biologically plausible deep learning - But how far can we go with shallow networks?abstractTraining deep neural networks with the error backpropagation algorithm is considered implausible from a biological perspective. Numerous recent publications suggest elaborate models for biologically plausible variants of deep learning, typically defining success as reaching around 98% test accuracy on the MNIST data set. Here, we investigate how far we can go on digit (MNIST) and object (CIFAR10) classification with biologically plausible, local learning rules in a network with one hidden layer and a single readout layer. The hidden layer weights are either fixed (random or random Gabor filters) or trained with unsupervised methods (Principal/Independent Component Analysis or Sparse Coding) that can be implemented by local learning rules. The readout layer is trained with a supervised, local learning rule. We first implement these models with rate neurons. This comparison reveals, first, that unsupervised learning does not lead to better performance than fixed random projections or Gabor filters for large hidden layers. Second, networks with localized receptive fields perform significantly better than networks with all-to-all connectivity and can reach backpropagation performance on MNIST. We then implement two of the networks - fixed, localized, random & random Gabor filters in the hidden layer - with spiking leaky integrate-and-fire neurons and spike timing dependent plasticity to train the readout layer. These spiking models achieve >98.2% test accuracy on MNIST, which is close to the performance of rate networks with one hidden layer trained with backpropagation. The performance of our shallow network models is comparable to most current biologically plausible models of deep learning. Furthermore, our results with a shallow spiking network provide an important reference and suggest the use of data sets other than MNIST for testing the performance of future models of biologically plausible deep learning. Bernd Illing, Wulfram Gerstner, Johanni Brea |
Neural Networks | 3 |
| 2018 | Efficient ModelBased Deep Reinforcement Learning with Variational State TabulationabstractModern reinforcement learning algorithms reach super-human performance on many board and video games, but they are sample inefficient, i.e. they typically require significantly more playing experience than humans to reach an equal performance level. To improve sample efficiency, an agent may build a model of the environment and use planning methods to update its policy. In this article we introduce Variational State Tabulation (VaST), which maps an environment with a high-dimensional state space (e.g. the space of visual inputs) to an abstract tabular model. Prioritized sweeping with small backups, a highly efficient planning method, can then be used to update state-action values. We show how VaST can rapidly learn to maximize reward in tasks like 3D navigation and efficiently adapt to sudden changes in rewards or transition probabilities. Dane S. Corneil, Wulfram Gerstner, Johanni Brea |
ICML | 3 |
| 2017 | Exponentially Long Orbits in Hopfield Neural NetworksabstractWe show that Hopfield neural networks with synchronous dynamics and asymmetric weights admit stable orbits that form sequences of maximal length. For [Formula: see text] units, these sequences have length [Formula: see text]; that is, they cover the full state space. We present a mathematical proof that maximal-length orbits exist for all [Formula: see text], and we provide a method to construct both the sequence and the weight matrix that allow its production. The orbit is relatively robust to dynamical noise, and perturbations of the optimal weights reveal other periodic orbits that are not maximal but typically still very long. We discuss how the resulting dynamics on slow time-scales can be used to generate desired output sequences. Samuel P. Muscinelli, Wulfram Gerstner, Johanni Brea |
Neural Comput. | 3 |
| 2016 | Prospective Coding by Spiking NeuronsabstractAnimals learn to make predictions, such as associating the sound of a bell with upcoming feeding or predicting a movement that a motor command is eliciting. How predictions are realized on the neuronal level and what plasticity rule underlies their learning is not well understood. Here we propose a biologically plausible synaptic plasticity rule to learn predictions on a single neuron level on a timescale of seconds. The learning rule allows a spiking two-compartment neuron to match its current firing rate to its own expected future discounted firing rate. For instance, if an originally neutral event is repeatedly followed by an event that elevates the firing rate of a neuron, the originally neutral event will eventually also elevate the neuron's firing rate. The plasticity rule is a form of spike timing dependent plasticity in which a presynaptic spike followed by a postsynaptic spike leads to potentiation. Even if the plasticity window has a width of 20 milliseconds, associations on the time scale of seconds can be learned. We illustrate prospective coding with three examples: learning to predict a time varying input, learning to predict the next stimulus in a delayed paired-associate task and learning with a recurrent network to reproduce a temporally compressed version of a sequence. We discuss the potential role of the learning mechanism in classical trace conditioning. In the special case that the signal to be predicted encodes reward, the neuron learns to predict the discounted future reward and learning is closely related to the temporal difference learning algorithm TD(λ). Johanni Brea, Alexisz Tamás Gaál, Robert Urbanczik, Walter Senn |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 1 |
| 2014 | A Normative Theory of Forgetting: Lessons from the Fruit FlyabstractRecent experiments revealed that the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster has a dedicated mechanism for forgetting: blocking the G-protein Rac leads to slower and activating Rac to faster forgetting. This active form of forgetting lacks a satisfactory functional explanation. We investigated optimal decision making for an agent adapting to a stochastic environment where a stimulus may switch between being indicative of reward or punishment. Like Drosophila, an optimal agent shows forgetting with a rate that is linked to the time scale of changes in the environment. Moreover, to reduce the odds of missing future reward, an optimal agent may trade the risk of immediate pain for information gain and thus forget faster after aversive conditioning. A simple neuronal network reproduces these features. Our theory shows that forgetting in Drosophila appears as an optimal adaptive behavior in a changing environment. This is in line with the view that forgetting is adaptive rather than a consequence of limitations of the memory system. Johanni Brea, Robert Urbanczik, Walter Senn |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 1 |
| 2011 | Sequence learning with hidden units in spiking neural networksabstractWe consider a statistical framework in which recurrent networks of spiking neurons learn to generate spatio-temporal spike patterns. Given biologically realistic stochastic neuronal dynamics we derive a tractable learning rule for the synaptic weights towards hidden and visible neurons that leads to optimal recall of the training sequences. We show that learning synaptic weights towards hidden neurons significantly improves the storing capacity of the network. Furthermore, we derive an approximate online learning rule and show that our learning rule is consistent with Spike-Timing Dependent Plasticity in that if a presynaptic spike shortly precedes a postynaptic spike, potentiation is induced and otherwise depression is elicited. Johanni Brea, Walter Senn, Jean-Pascal Pfister |
NIPS | 1 |