VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jiesheng Wu
dblp:64/2146
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers in the field
0as first author
10since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — venue-derived; a paper can count in several
Big Data, Cloud & Distributed Data Systems · 7Database Systems & Data Management · 2Data Mining & Knowledge Discovery · 1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | How Soon is Now? Preloading Images for Virtual Disks with ThinkAhead
Xinqi Chen, Erci Xu, Changhong Wang 0005, Jifei Yi, Qiuping Wang, Shizhuo Sun, Junping Wu, Hailin Peng, Yinhu Wang, Jiaji Zhu, Jiesheng Wu, Guangtao Xue, Patrick P. C. Lee |
FAST | 15 |
| 2026 | Here, There and Everywhere: The Past, the Present and the Future of Local Storage in Cloud
Leping Yang, Yanbo Zhou, Gong Zeng, Saisai Zhang, Ruilin Wu, Chaoyang Sun, Shiyi Luo, Keqiang Niu, Junping Wu, Jiaji Zhu, Jiesheng Wu, Mariusz Barczak, Wayne Gao, Ruiming Lu, Erci Xu, Guangtao Xue |
FAST | 14 |
| 2024 | What's the Story in EBS Glory: Evolutions and Lessons in Building Cloud Block Store
Weidong Zhang 0011, Erci Xu, Qiuping Wang, Yuesheng Gu, Zhenwei Lu, Tao Ouyang, Guanqun Dai, Wenwen Peng, Yilei Peng, Tianyun Wang, Wenyuan Yan, Wenhui Yao, Zhongjie Wu, Lingjun Zhu, Yinhu Wang, Junping Wu, Jiaji Zhu, Jiesheng Wu |
FAST | 27 |
| 2024 | Bwe-tree: An Evolution of Bw-tree on Fast StorageabstractModern data-centric applications frequently need to store and read data with low latency. These requirements are difficult to achieve, even on high performance processors paired with fast solid state drives (SSDs). To this end, LSM tree is widely used in many systems such as in RocksDB and considered as an ideal index structure that fits SSDs. However, in spite of many improvements to LSM tree over the years, fundamental problems of limited read performance and expensive compaction operations remain. Microsoft Research proposed Bw-tree, a variant of B+ tree layered on top of log structured storage. Bw-tree achieves fast ingestion of data, similar to LSM tree, meanwhile it has less drawback on read performance and compaction. However, except for Microsoft, the industrial strength implementation of Bw-tree is rare. The open source OpenBw-Tree from Carnegie Mellon University was designed only for main memory. This paper describes Bwe-tree, an implementation and a significant evolution of Bw-tree on fast storage. It makes two contributions. First, Bwe-tree addresses reliability and performance issues revealed during running Bw-tree on fast storage in production, by revising structural modification operations, introducing page concurrency control, and storing large-size values off-tree. Performance improvements over Bw-tree are verified by experiments. Second, it demonstrates that Bw-tree is an effective alternative tree structure on SSDs. Compared to RocksDB (LSM tree) and BerkeleyDB (B+ tree), Bwe-vtree performs dramatically better (up to 3X or more) for the YCSB workloads. Our Bwe-vtree implementation has been integrated into production systems in Alibaba, including a flagshin cloud-native database service. Rui Wang 0002, Xinjun Yang, Feifei Li 0001, David B. Lomet, Panfeng Zhou, Yongxiang Chen, Jingren Zhou 0001, Jiesheng Wu |
ICDE | 10 |
| 2024 | LogParser-LLM: Advancing Efficient Log Parsing with Large Language ModelsabstractLogs are ubiquitous digital footprints, playing an indispensable role in system diagnostics, security analysis, and performance optimization. The extraction of actionable insights from logs is critically dependent on the log parsing process, which converts raw logs into structured formats for downstream analysis. Yet, the complexities of contemporary systems and the dynamic nature of logs pose significant challenges to existing automatic parsing techniques. The emergence of Large Language Models (LLM) offers new horizons. With their expansive knowledge and contextual prowess, LLMs have been transformative across diverse applications. Building on this, we introduce LogParser-LLM, a novel log parser integrated with LLM capabilities. This union seamlessly blends semantic insights with statistical nuances, obviating the need for hyper-parameter tuning and labeled training data, while ensuring rapid adaptability through online parsing. Further deepening our exploration, we address the intricate challenge of parsing granularity, proposing a new metric and integrating human interactions to allow users to calibrate granularity to their specific needs. Our method's efficacy is empirically demonstrated through evaluations on the Loghub-2k and the large-scale LogPub benchmark. In evaluations on the LogPub benchmark, involving an average of 3.6 million logs per dataset across 14 datasets, our LogParser-LLM requires only 272.5 LLM invocations on average, achieving a 90.6% F1 score for grouping accuracy and an 81.1% for parsing accuracy. These results demonstrate the method's high efficiency and accuracy, outperforming current state-of-the-art log parsers, including pattern-based, neural network-based, and existing LLM-enhanced approaches. Aoxiao Zhong, Dengyao Mo, Guiyang Liu, Jinbu Liu, Qingda Lu, Qi Zhou 0001, Jiesheng Wu, Quanzheng Li, Qingsong Wen |
KDD | 7 |
| 2023 | Fisc: A Large-scale Cloud-native-oriented File System
Qiang Li 0045, Lulu Chen, Xiaoliang Wang 0001, Qiao Xiang, Wenhui Yao, Minfei Huang, Puyuan Yang, Shanyang Liu, Zhaosheng Zhu, Huayong Wang, Haonan Qiu, Derui Liu, Shaozong Liu, Yaohui Wu, Zhiwu Wu, Zicheng Luo, Yuchao Shao, Gexiao Tian, Zhongjie Wu, Zheng Cao 0003, Jiwu Shu, Jie Wu 0003, Jiesheng Wu |
FAST | 29 |
| 2023 | More Than Capacity: Performance-oriented Evolution of Pangu in Alibaba
Qiang Li 0045, Qiao Xiang, Yuxin Wang 0003, Ridi Wen, Wenhui Yao, Shuqi Zhao, Zhaosheng Zhu, Huayong Wang, Shanyang Liu, Lulu Chen, Zhiwu Wu, Haonan Qiu, Derui Liu, Gexiao Tian, Shaozong Liu, Yaohui Wu, Zicheng Luo, Yuchao Shao, Junping Wu, Zheng Cao 0003, Zhongjie Wu, Jiaji Zhu, Jiwu Shu, Jiesheng Wu |
FAST | 29 |
| 2023 | Perseus: A Fail-Slow Detection Framework for Cloud Storage Systems
Ruiming Lu, Erci Xu, Yiming Zhang 0003, Fengyi Zhu, Zhaosheng Zhu, Mengtian Wang, Zongpeng Zhu, Guangtao Xue, Jiwu Shu, Minglu Li 0001, Jiesheng Wu |
FAST | 11 |
| 2023 | SMRSTORE: A Storage Engine for Cloud Object Storage on HM-SMR Drives
Erci Xu, Jiacheng Cui, Wanyu Fu, Yingni Wang, Shouqu Sun, Xianfei Wang, Biyun Zhu, Weikang Kong, Linyan Liu, Zhongjie Wu, Qingchao Luo, Jiesheng Wu |
FAST | 20 |
| 2021 | ArkDB: A Key-Value Engine for Scalable Cloud Storage ServicesabstractPersistent key-value stores play a crucial role in enabling internet-scale services. At Alibaba Cloud, scale-out cloud storage services including Object Storage Service, File Storage Service and Tablestore are built on distributed key-value stores. Key challenges in the design of the underlying key-value engine for these services lie in utilization of disaggregated storage, supporting write and range query-heavy workloads, and balancing of scalability, availability and resource usage. This paper presents ArkDB, a key-value engine designed to address these challenges by combining advantages of both LSM tree and Bw-tree, and leveraging advances in hardware technologies. Built on top of Pangu, an append-only distributed file system, ArkDB's innovations include shrinkable page mapping table, clear separation of system and user states for fast recovery, write amplification reduction, efficient garbage collection and lightweight partition split and merge. Experimental results demonstrate ArkDB's improvements over existing designs. Compared with Bw-tree, ArkDB efficiently stabilizes the mapping table size despite continuous write working set growth. Compared with RocksDB, an LSM tree-based key-value engine, ArkDB increases ingestion throughput by 2.16x, while reducing write amplification by 3.1x. It outperforms RocksDB by 52% and 37% respectively on a write-heavy workload and a range query-intensive workload of the Yahoo! Cloud Serving Benchmark. Experiments running in Tablestore in a cluster environment further demonstrate ArkDB's performance on Pangu and its efficient partition split/merge support. Zhu Pang, Qingda Lu, Rui Wang 0002, Yikang Xu, Jiesheng Wu |
SIGMOD Conference | 6 |