Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mike W. Oram

dblp:64/49 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
0000-0001-5005-4208ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
bayesian model selection
0.112007
Bayesian binning beats approximate alternatives: estimating peri-stimulus time histograms · NIPS 2007
Bioinformatics and computational biology
computational neuroscience
0.112007
Bayesian binning beats approximate alternatives: estimating peri-stimulus time histograms · NIPS 2007
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience › neuroinformatics › neural data analysis
spike train analysis
0.112007
Bayesian binning beats approximate alternatives: estimating peri-stimulus time histograms · NIPS 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

gaussian kernel smoothing · 0.1bayesian binning · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2008 Adaptive Integration in the Visual Cortex by Depressing Recurrent Cortical Circuits
abstract
Neurons in the visual cortex receive a large amount of input from recurrent connections, yet the functional role of these connections remains unclear. Here we explore networks with strong recurrence in a computational model and show that short-term depression of the synapses in the recurrent loops implements an adaptive filter. This allows the visual system to respond reliably to deteriorated stimuli yet quickly to high-quality stimuli. For low-contrast stimuli, the model predicts long response latencies, whereas latencies are short for high-contrast stimuli. This is consistent with physiological data showing that in higher visual areas, latencies can increase more than 100 ms at low contrast compared to high contrast. Moreover, when presented with briefly flashed stimuli, the model predicts stereotypical responses that outlast the stimulus, again consistent with physiological findings. The adaptive properties of the model suggest that the abundant recurrent connections found in visual cortex serve to adapt the network's time constant in accordance with the stimulus and normalizes neuronal signals such that processing is as fast as possible while maintaining reliability.
Mark C. W. van Rossum, Matthijs A. A. van der Meer, Dengke Xiao, Mike W. Oram
Neural Comput.4
2007 Bayesian binning beats approximate alternatives: estimating peri-stimulus time histograms
abstract
The peristimulus time historgram (PSTH) and its more continuous cousin, the spike density function (SDF) are staples in the analytic toolkit of neurophysiologists. The former is usually obtained by binning spiketrains, whereas the standard method for the latter is smoothing with a Gaussian kernel. Selection of a bin with or a kernel size is often done in an relatively arbitrary fashion, even though there have been recent attempts to remedy this situation \cite{ShimazakiBinningNIPS2006,ShimazakiBinningNECO2007}. We develop an exact Bayesian, generative model approach to estimating PSHTs and demonstate its superiority to competing methods. Further advantages of our scheme include automatic complexity control and error bars on its predictions.
Dominik M. Endres, Mike W. Oram, Johannes E. Schindelin, Peter Földiák
NIPS2
1996 Learning generalisation and localisation: Competition for stimulus type and receptive field
Mike W. Oram, Peter Földiák
Neurocomputing1
1994 Modeling visual recognition from neurobiological constraints
Mike W. Oram, David I. Perrett
Neural Networks1
1993 Neurophysiology of shape processing
David I. Perrett, Mike W. Oram
Image Vis. Comput.2