Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Karla V. Ballman
dblp:64/5420
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
0000-0002-4492-0357ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational microbiology › microbiome analysis
differential abundance testing |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | An omnibus test for differential distribution analysis of microbiome sequencing data · Bioinform. 2018 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational microbiology
microbiome analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | An omnibus test for differential distribution analysis of microbiome sequencing data · Bioinform. 2018 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis |
0.1 | 2 | 2006 | Joint estimation of calibration and expression for high-density oligonucleotide arrays · Bioinform. 2006 Faster cyclic loess: normalizing RNA arrays via linear models · Bioinform. 2004 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis › microarray data preprocessing
microarray data normalization |
0.1 | 2 | 2006 | Joint estimation of calibration and expression for high-density oligonucleotide arrays · Bioinform. 2006 Faster cyclic loess: normalizing RNA arrays via linear models · Bioinform. 2004 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
differential expression analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Joint estimation of calibration and expression for high-density oligonucleotide arrays · Bioinform. 2006 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
zero-inflated negative binomial regression · 0.3winsorized count data · 0.3generalized linear model · 0.1calibration model · 0.1linear model · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | An omnibus test for differential distribution analysis of microbiome sequencing dataabstractMotivation: One objective of human microbiome studies is to identify differentially abundant microbes across biological conditions. Previous statistical methods focus on detecting the shift in the abundance and/or prevalence of the microbes and treat the dispersion (spread of the data) as a nuisance. These methods also assume that the dispersion is the same across conditions, an assumption which may not hold in presence of sample heterogeneity. Moreover, the widespread outliers in the microbiome sequencing data make existing parametric models not overly robust. Therefore, a robust and powerful method that allows covariate-dependent dispersion and addresses outliers is still needed for differential abundance analysis. Results: We introduce a novel test for differential distribution analysis of microbiome sequencing data by jointly testing the abundance, prevalence and dispersion. The test is built on a zero-inflated negative binomial regression model and winsorized count data to account for zero-inflation and outliers. Using simulated data and real microbiome sequencing datasets, we show that our test is robust across various biological conditions and overall more powerful than previous methods. Availability and implementation: R package is available at https://github.com/jchen1981/MicrobiomeDDA. Contact: [email protected] or [email protected]. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Emily King, Rebecca Deek, Zhi Wei 0001, Diane E. Grill, Karla V. Ballman |
Bioinform. | 7 |
| 2006 | Joint estimation of calibration and expression for high-density oligonucleotide arraysabstractMOTIVATION: The need for normalization in microarray experiments has been well documented in the literature. Currently, many analysis methods treat normalization and analysis as a series of steps, with summarized data carried forward to the next step. RESULTS: We present a unified algorithm which incorporates normalization and class comparison in one analysis using probe level perfect match and mismatch data. The algorithm is based on calibration models common to most biological assays, and the resulting chip-specific parameters have a natural interpretation. We show that the algorithm fits into the statistical generalized linear models framework, describe a practical fitting strategy and present results of the algorithm applied to an example dataset as well as based on metrics used in affycomp. The algorithm ranks amongst the top third of the affycomp competitors, performing best in measures of bias. AVAILABILITY: R functions are available on request from the authors. Ann L. Oberg, Douglas W. Mahoney, Karla V. Ballman, Terry M. Therneau |
Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2004 | Faster cyclic loess: normalizing RNA arrays via linear modelsabstractMOTIVATION: Our goal was to develop a normalization technique that yields results similar to cyclic loess normalization and with speed comparable to quantile normalization. RESULTS: Fastlo yields normalized values similar to cyclic loess and quantile normalization and is fast; it is at least an order of magnitude faster than cyclic loess and approaches the speed of quantile normalization. Furthermore, fastlo is more versatile than both cyclic loess and quantile normalization because it is model-based. AVAILABILITY: The Splus/R function for fastlo normalization is available from the authors. Karla V. Ballman, Diane E. Grill, Ann L. Oberg, Terry M. Therneau |
Bioinform. | 1 |