Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Evelyn Pierce

dblp:64/5911 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Distributed computing theory · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed computing theory
mutual exclusion
0.112011
Multiwriter Consistency Conditions for Shared Memory Registers · SIAM J. Comput. 2011
Distributed computing theory
shared memory consistency
0.112011
Multiwriter Consistency Conditions for Shared Memory Registers · SIAM J. Comput. 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

quorum-based algorithm · 0.1partial orders · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 Multiwriter Consistency Conditions for Shared Memory Registers
abstract
Regularity is a shared memory consistency condition that has received considerable attention. Lamport's original definition of regularity assumed a single-writer model, however, and is not well defined when the shared register may have multiple writers. In this paper, we consider four possible definitions of multiwriter regularity. The definitions are motivated by variations on a quorum-based algorithm schema for implementing them. We study the relationships between these definitions and a number of other well-known consistency conditions, and we give a partial order describing the relative strengths of these consistency conditions. Finally, we provide a practical context for our results by studying the correctness of two well-known algorithms for mutual exclusion under each of our proposed consistency conditions.
Cheng Shao, Jennifer L. Welch, Evelyn Pierce, Hyunyoung Lee 0001
SIAM J. Comput.3
2003 Multi-writer Consistency Conditions for Shared Memory Objects
Cheng Shao, Evelyn Pierce, Jennifer L. Welch
DISC2