Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tomoki Yoshida
dblp:64/7198
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Graph learning · 36% Optimization for machine learning · 32% Representation and self-supervised learning · 32% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph metric learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Learning Interpretable Metric between Graphs: Convex Formulation and Computation with Graph Mining · KDD 2019 |
Data mining › structured data mining
graph mining |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Learning Interpretable Metric between Graphs: Convex Formulation and Computation with Graph Mining · KDD 2019 |
Data mining › structured data mining › graph mining
subgraph mining |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Learning Interpretable Metric between Graphs: Convex Formulation and Computation with Graph Mining · KDD 2019 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
metric learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Safe Triplet Screening for Distance Metric Learning · KDD 2018 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
safe screening |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Safe Triplet Screening for Distance Metric Learning · KDD 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
convex optimization · 1.1graph mining · 0.8semidefinite programming · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Distance metric learning for graph structured data
Tomoki Yoshida, Ichiro Takeuchi, Masayuki Karasuyama |
Mach. Learn. | 1 |
| 2019 | Learning Interpretable Metric between Graphs: Convex Formulation and Computation with Graph MiningabstractGraph is a standard approach to modeling structured data. Although many machine learning methods depend on the metric of the input objects, defining an appropriate distance function on graph is still a controversial issue. We propose a novel supervised metric learning method for a subgraph-based distance, called interpretable graph metric learning (IGML). IGML optimizes the distance function in such a way that a small number of important subgraphs can be adaptively selected. This optimization is computationally intractable with naive application of existing optimization algorithms. We construct a graph mining based efficient algorithm to deal with this computational difficulty. Important advantages of our method are 1) guarantee of the optimality from the convex formulation, and 2) high interpretability of results. To our knowledge, none of the existing studies provide an interpretable subgraph-based metric in a supervised manner. In our experiments, we empirically verify superior or comparable prediction performance of IGML to other existing graph classification methods which do not have clear interpretability. Further, we demonstrate usefulness of IGML through some illustrative examples of extracted subgraphs and an example of data analysis on the learned metric space. Tomoki Yoshida, Ichiro Takeuchi, Masayuki Karasuyama |
KDD | 1 |
| 2019 | Safe Triplet Screening for Distance Metric LearningabstractDistance metric learning has been widely used to obtain the optimal distance function based on the given training data. We focus on a triplet-based loss function, which imposes a penalty such that a pair of instances in the same class is closer than a pair in different classes. However, the number of possible triplets can be quite large even for a small data set, and this considerably increases the computational cost for metric optimization. In this letter, we propose safe triplet screening that identifies triplets that can be safely removed from the optimization problem without losing the optimality. In comparison with existing safe screening studies, triplet screening is particularly significant because of the huge number of possible triplets and the semidefinite constraint in the optimization problem. We demonstrate and verify the effectiveness of our screening rules by using several benchmark data sets. Tomoki Yoshida, Ichiro Takeuchi, Masayuki Karasuyama |
Neural Comput. | 1 |
| 2018 | Safe Triplet Screening for Distance Metric LearningabstractWe study safe screening for metric learning. Distance metric learning can optimize a metric over a set of triplets, each one of which is defined by a pair of same class instances and an instance in a different class. However, the number of possible triplets is quite huge even for a small dataset. Our safe triplet screening identifies triplets which can be safely removed from the optimization problem without losing the optimality. Compared with existing safe screening studies, triplet screening is particularly significant because of (1) the huge number of possible triplets, and (2) the semi-definite constraint in the optimization. We derive several variants of screening rules, and analyze their relationships. Numerical experiments on benchmark datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of safe triplet screening. Tomoki Yoshida, Ichiro Takeuchi, Masayuki Karasuyama |
KDD | 1 |