Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tomoki Yoshida

dblp:64/7198 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Graph learning · 36% Optimization for machine learning · 32% Representation and self-supervised learning · 32%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph metric learning
0.412019
Learning Interpretable Metric between Graphs: Convex Formulation and Computation with Graph Mining · KDD 2019
Data mining › structured data mining
graph mining
0.412019
Learning Interpretable Metric between Graphs: Convex Formulation and Computation with Graph Mining · KDD 2019
Data mining › structured data mining › graph mining
subgraph mining
0.412019
Learning Interpretable Metric between Graphs: Convex Formulation and Computation with Graph Mining · KDD 2019
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
metric learning
0.312018
Safe Triplet Screening for Distance Metric Learning · KDD 2018
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
safe screening
0.312018
Safe Triplet Screening for Distance Metric Learning · KDD 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

convex optimization · 1.1graph mining · 0.8semidefinite programming · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Distance metric learning for graph structured data
Tomoki Yoshida, Ichiro Takeuchi, Masayuki Karasuyama
Mach. Learn.1
2019 Learning Interpretable Metric between Graphs: Convex Formulation and Computation with Graph Mining
abstract
Graph is a standard approach to modeling structured data. Although many machine learning methods depend on the metric of the input objects, defining an appropriate distance function on graph is still a controversial issue. We propose a novel supervised metric learning method for a subgraph-based distance, called interpretable graph metric learning (IGML). IGML optimizes the distance function in such a way that a small number of important subgraphs can be adaptively selected. This optimization is computationally intractable with naive application of existing optimization algorithms. We construct a graph mining based efficient algorithm to deal with this computational difficulty. Important advantages of our method are 1) guarantee of the optimality from the convex formulation, and 2) high interpretability of results. To our knowledge, none of the existing studies provide an interpretable subgraph-based metric in a supervised manner. In our experiments, we empirically verify superior or comparable prediction performance of IGML to other existing graph classification methods which do not have clear interpretability. Further, we demonstrate usefulness of IGML through some illustrative examples of extracted subgraphs and an example of data analysis on the learned metric space.
Tomoki Yoshida, Ichiro Takeuchi, Masayuki Karasuyama
KDD1
2019 Safe Triplet Screening for Distance Metric Learning
abstract
Distance metric learning has been widely used to obtain the optimal distance function based on the given training data. We focus on a triplet-based loss function, which imposes a penalty such that a pair of instances in the same class is closer than a pair in different classes. However, the number of possible triplets can be quite large even for a small data set, and this considerably increases the computational cost for metric optimization. In this letter, we propose safe triplet screening that identifies triplets that can be safely removed from the optimization problem without losing the optimality. In comparison with existing safe screening studies, triplet screening is particularly significant because of the huge number of possible triplets and the semidefinite constraint in the optimization problem. We demonstrate and verify the effectiveness of our screening rules by using several benchmark data sets.
Tomoki Yoshida, Ichiro Takeuchi, Masayuki Karasuyama
Neural Comput.1
2018 Safe Triplet Screening for Distance Metric Learning
abstract
We study safe screening for metric learning. Distance metric learning can optimize a metric over a set of triplets, each one of which is defined by a pair of same class instances and an instance in a different class. However, the number of possible triplets is quite huge even for a small dataset. Our safe triplet screening identifies triplets which can be safely removed from the optimization problem without losing the optimality. Compared with existing safe screening studies, triplet screening is particularly significant because of (1) the huge number of possible triplets, and (2) the semi-definite constraint in the optimization. We derive several variants of screening rules, and analyze their relationships. Numerical experiments on benchmark datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of safe triplet screening.
Tomoki Yoshida, Ichiro Takeuchi, Masayuki Karasuyama
KDD1