Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Brett Trost
dblp:64/8709
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
0000-0003-4863-7273ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 8 · 4 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
4 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics › post-translational modification prediction
phosphorylation site prediction |
0.5 | 3 | 2013 | Computational phosphorylation site prediction in plants using random forests and organism-specific instance weights · Bioinform. 2013 DAPPLE: a pipeline for the homology-based prediction of phosphorylation sites · Bioinform. 2013 Computational prediction of eukaryotic phosphorylation sites · Bioinform. 2011 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics
post-translational modification prediction |
0.5 | 3 | 2013 | Computational phosphorylation site prediction in plants using random forests and organism-specific instance weights · Bioinform. 2013 DAPPLE: a pipeline for the homology-based prediction of phosphorylation sites · Bioinform. 2013 Computational prediction of eukaryotic phosphorylation sites · Bioinform. 2011 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
immunoinformatics |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | EpIC: a rational pipeline for epitope immunogenicity characterization · Bioinform. 2015 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › immunoinformatics
vaccine design |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | EpIC: a rational pipeline for epitope immunogenicity characterization · Bioinform. 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
b-cell epitope occurrence analysis · 0.2transfer learning · 0.2random forest · 0.2instance weighting · 0.2homology-based prediction · 0.2machine learning · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | Case study: using sequence homology to identify putative phosphorylation sites in an evolutionarily distant species (honeybee)abstractThe majority of scientific resources are devoted to studying a relatively small number of model species, meaning that the ability to translate knowledge across species is of considerable importance. Obtaining species-specific knowledge enables targeted investigations of the biology and pathobiology of a particular species, and facilitates comparative analyses. Phosphorylation is the most widespread posttranslational modification in eukaryotes, and although many phosphorylation sites have been experimentally identified for some species, little or no data are available for others. Using the honeybee as a test organism, this case study illustrates the process of using protein sequence homology to identify putative phosphorylation sites in a species of interest using experimentally determined sites from other species. A number of issues associated with this process are examined and discussed. Several databases of experimentally determined phosphorylation sites exist; however, it can be difficult for the nonspecialist to ascertain how their contents compare. Thus, this case study assesses the content and comparability of several phosphorylation site databases. Additional issues examined include the efficacy of homology-based phosphorylation site prediction, the impact of the level of evolutionary relatedness between species in making these predictions, the ability to translate knowledge of phosphorylation sites across large evolutionary distances and the criteria that should be used in selecting probable phosphorylation sites in the species of interest. Although focusing on phosphorylation, the issues discussed here also apply to the homology-based cross-species prediction of other posttranslational modifications, as well as to sequence motifs in general. Brett Trost, Scott Napper, Anthony J. Kusalik |
Briefings Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2015 | EpIC: a rational pipeline for epitope immunogenicity characterizationabstractUNLABELLED: Efforts to develop peptide-based vaccines, in particular those requiring site-specific targeting of self-proteins, rely on the ability to optimize the immunogenicity of the peptide epitopes. Currently, screening of candidate vaccines is typically performed through low-throughput, high-cost animal trials. To improve on this we present the program EpIC, which enables high-throughput prediction of peptide immunogenicity based on the endogenous occurrence of B-cell epitopes within native protein sequences. This information informs rational selection of immunogenicity-optimized epitopes for peptide vaccines. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: EpIC is available as a web server at http://saphire.usask.ca/saphire/epic. Kristen Marciniuk, Brett Trost, Scott Napper |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2014 | A better sequence-read simulator program for metagenomicsabstractBACKGROUND: There are many programs available for generating simulated whole-genome shotgun sequence reads. The data generated by many of these programs follow predefined models, which limits their use to the authors' original intentions. For example, many models assume that read lengths follow a uniform or normal distribution. Other programs generate models from actual sequencing data, but are limited to reads from single-genome studies. To our knowledge, there are no programs that allow a user to generate simulated data following non-parametric read-length distributions and quality profiles based on empirically-derived information from metagenomics sequencing data. RESULTS: We present BEAR (Better Emulation for Artificial Reads), a program that uses a machine-learning approach to generate reads with lengths and quality values that closely match empirically-derived distributions. BEAR can emulate reads from various sequencing platforms, including Illumina, 454, and Ion Torrent. BEAR requires minimal user input, as it automatically determines appropriate parameter settings from user-supplied data. BEAR also uses a unique method for deriving run-specific error rates, and extracts useful statistics from the metagenomic data itself, such as quality-error models. Many existing simulators are specific to a particular sequencing technology; however, BEAR is not restricted in this way. Because of its flexibility, BEAR is particularly useful for emulating the behaviour of technologies like Ion Torrent, for which no dedicated sequencing simulators are currently available. BEAR is also the first metagenomic sequencing simulator program that automates the process of generating abundances, which can be an arduous task. CONCLUSIONS: BEAR is useful for evaluating data processing tools in genomics. It has many advantages over existing comparable software, such as generating more realistic reads and being independent of sequencing technology, and has features particularly useful for metagenomics work. Brett Trost, Jeffrey R. Long, Vanessa Pittet, Anthony J. Kusalik |
BMC Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2014 | Equivalent input produces different output in the UniFrac significance testabstractBACKGROUND: UniFrac is a well-known tool for comparing microbial communities and assessing statistically significant differences between communities. In this paper we identify a discrepancy in the UniFrac methodology that causes semantically equivalent inputs to produce different outputs in tests of statistical significance. RESULTS: The phylogenetic trees that are input into UniFrac may or may not contain abundance counts. An isomorphic transform can be defined that will convert trees between these two formats without altering the semantic meaning of the trees. UniFrac produces different outputs for these equivalent forms of the same input tree. This is illustrated using metagenomics data from a lake sediment study. CONCLUSIONS: Results from the UniFrac tool can vary greatly for the same input depending on the arbitrary choice of input format. Practitioners should be aware of this issue and use the tool with caution to ensure consistency and validity in their analyses. We provide a script to transform inputs between equivalent formats to help researchers achieve this consistency. Jeffrey R. Long, Vanessa Pittet, Brett Trost, Qingxiang Yan, David Vickers, Monique Haakensen, Anthony J. Kusalik |
BMC Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2013 | DAPPLE: a pipeline for the homology-based prediction of phosphorylation sitesabstractSUMMARY: While many experimentally characterized phosphorylation sites exist for certain organisms, such as human, rat and mouse, few sites are known for other organisms, hampering related research efforts. We have developed a software pipeline called DAPPLE that automates the process of using known phosphorylation sites from other organisms to identify putative sites in an organism of interest. AVAILABILITY: DAPPLE is available as a web server at http://saphire.usask.ca. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Brett Trost, Ryan Arsenault, Philip J. Griebel, Scott Napper, Anthony J. Kusalik |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2013 | Computational phosphorylation site prediction in plants using random forests and organism-specific instance weightsabstractAbstract Motivation: Phosphorylation is the most important post-translational modification in eukaryotes. Although many computational phosphorylation site prediction tools exist for mammals, and a few were created specifically for Arabidopsis thaliana, none are currently available for other plants. Results: In this article, we propose a novel random forest-based method called PHOSFER (PHOsphorylation Site FindER) for applying phosphorylation data from other organisms to enhance the accuracy of predictions in a target organism. As a test case, PHOSFER is applied to phosphorylation sites in soybean, and we show that it more accurately predicts soybean sites than both the existing Arabidopsis-specific predictors, and a simpler machine-learning scheme that uses only known phosphorylation sites and non-phosphorylation sites from soybean. In addition to soybean, PHOSFER will be extended to other organisms in the near future. Availability: PHOSFER is available via a web interface at http://saphire.usask.ca. Contact: [email protected] Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Brett Trost, Anthony J. Kusalik |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2011 | Computational prediction of eukaryotic phosphorylation sitesabstractMOTIVATION: Kinase-mediated phosphorylation is the central mechanism of post-translational modification to regulate cellular responses and phenotypes. Signaling defects associated with protein phosphorylation are linked to many diseases, particularly cancer. Characterizing protein kinases and their substrates enhances our ability to understand and treat such diseases and broadens our knowledge of signaling networks in general. While most or all protein kinases have been identified in well-studied eukaryotes, the sites that they phosphorylate have been only partially elucidated. Experimental methods for identifying phosphorylation sites are resource intensive, so the ability to computationally predict potential sites has considerable value. RESULTS: Many computational techniques for phosphorylation site prediction have been proposed, most of which are available on the web. These techniques differ in several ways, including the machine learning technique used; the amount of sequence information used; whether or not structural information is used in addition to sequence information; whether predictions are made for specific kinases or for kinases in general; and sources of training and testing data. This review summarizes, categorizes and compares the available methods for phosphorylation site prediction, and provides an overview of the challenges that are faced when designing predictors and how they have been addressed. It should therefore be useful both for those wishing to choose a phosphorylation site predictor for their particular biological application, and for those attempting to improve upon established techniques in the future. CONTACT: [email protected]. Brett Trost, Anthony J. Kusalik |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2010 | The oligodeoxynucleotide sequences corresponding to never-expressed peptide motifs are mainly located in the non-coding strandabstractBACKGROUND: We study the usage of specific peptide platforms in protein composition. Using the pentapeptide as a unit of length, we find that in the universal proteome many pentapeptides are heavily repeated (even thousands of times), whereas some are quite rare, and a small number do not appear at all. To understand the physico-chemical-biological basis underlying peptide usage at the proteomic level, in this study we analyse the energetic costs for the synthesis of rare and never-expressed versus frequent pentapeptides. In addition, we explore residue bulkiness, hydrophobicity, and codon number as factors able to modulate specific peptide frequencies. Then, the possible influence of amino acid composition is investigated in zero- and high-frequency pentapeptide sets by analysing the frequencies of the corresponding inverse-sequence pentapeptides. As a final step, we analyse the pentadecamer oligodeoxynucleotide sequences corresponding to the never-expressed pentapeptides. RESULTS: We find that only DNA context-dependent constraints (such as oligodeoxynucleotide sequence location in the minus strand, introns, pseudogenes, frameshifts, etc.) provide a coherent mechanistic platform to explain the occurrence of never-expressed versus frequent pentapeptides in the protein world. CONCLUSIONS: This study is of importance in cell biology. Indeed, the rarity (or lack of expression) of specific 5-mer peptide modules implies the rarity (or lack of expression) of the corresponding n-mer peptide sequences (with n < 5), so possibly modulating protein compositional trends. Moreover the data might further our understanding of the role exerted by rare pentapeptide modules as critical biological effectors in protein-protein interactions. Giovanni Capone, Giuseppe Novello, Candida Fasano, Brett Trost, Mikelis G. Bickis, Anthony J. Kusalik, Darja Kanduc |
BMC Bioinform. | 4 |