Mark Tiefenbruck

dblp:64/9710 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-5439-9171ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Coding theory · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
covering radius
0.612022
The Covering Radius of the Reed-Muller Code RM(m - 4, m) in RM(m - 3, m) · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2022
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
reed-muller codes
0.612022
The Covering Radius of the Reed-Muller Code RM(m - 4, m) in RM(m - 3, m) · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

certificate-based bounds · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 The Covering Radius of the Reed-Muller Code RM(m - 4, m) in RM(m - 3, m)
abstract
We present methods for computing the distance from a Boolean polynomial on$m$variables of degree$m-3$(i.e., a member of the Reed–Muller code$RM(m-3, m)$) to the space of lower-degree polynomials ($RM(m-4, m)$). The methods give verifiable certificates for both the lower and upper bounds on this distance. By applying these methods to representative lists of polynomials, we show that the covering radius of$RM(4,8)$in$RM(5,8)$is 26 and the covering radius of$RM(5,9)$in$RM(6,9)$is between 28 and 32 inclusive, and we get improved lower bounds for higher$m$. We also apply our methods to various polynomials in the literature, thereby improving the known bounds on the distance from 2-resilient polynomials to$RM(m-4, m)$.
Randall Dougherty, R. Daniel Mauldin, Mark Tiefenbruck
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory3