Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Michael L. Kazar
dblp:64/99 · also Michael Leon Kazar
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1988
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Storage systems · 70% Distributed systems · 30% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Storage systems › file systems
distributed file system |
0.0 | 2 | 1988 | Scale and Performance in a Distributed File System · ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 1988 Scale and Performance in a Distributed File System (Extended Abstract) · SOSP 1987 |
Distributed systems › peer-to-peer systems
file sharing |
0.0 | 1 | 1987 | Scale and Performance in a Distributed File System (Extended Abstract) · SOSP 1987 |
Storage systems › file systems
scalable file system |
0.0 | 1 | 1987 | Scale and Performance in a Distributed File System (Extended Abstract) · SOSP 1987 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
trace analysis · 0.0system design · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1988 | Scale and Performance in a Distributed File SystemabstractThe Andrew File System is a location-transparent distributed tile system that will eventually span more than 5000 workstations at Carnegie Mellon University. Large scale affects performance and complicates system operation. In this paper we present observations of a prototype implementation, motivate changes in the areas of cache validation, server process structure, name translation, and low-level storage representation, and quantitatively demonstrate Andrews ability to scale gracefully. We establish the importance of whole-file transfer and caching in Andrew by comparing its performance with that of Sun Microsystems NFS tile system. We also show how the aggregation of files into volumes improves the operability of the system. John H. Howard, Michael L. Kazar, Sherri G. Menees, David A. Nichols, Mahadev Satyanarayanan, Robert N. Sidebotham, Michael J. West |
ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. | 2 |
| 1987 | Scale and Performance in a Distributed File System (Extended Abstract)abstractAndrew is a distributed computing environment being developed in a joint project by Carnegie Mellon University and IBM. One of the major components of Andrew is a distributed file system which constitutes underlying mechanism for sharing information. The goals of the Andrew file system are to support growth up to at least 7000 workstations (one for each student, faculty member, and staff at Carnegie Mellon) while providing users, application programs, and system administrators with the amenities of a shared file system. John H. Howard, Michael L. Kazar, Sherri G. Menees, David A. Nichols, Mahadev Satyanarayanan, Robert N. Sidebotham, Michael J. West |
SOSP | 2 |