Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Stefan Ankirchner

dblp:65/10624 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0001-8216-6335ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Optimization for machine learning · 50% Deep learning architectures and training · 50%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › training dynamics
optimization dynamics
0.812024
A Comparison of Continuous-Time Approximations to Stochastic Gradient Descent · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient descent
0.812024
A Comparison of Continuous-Time Approximations to Stochastic Gradient Descent · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

weak error expansion · 0.8stochastic differential equation · 0.8ordinary differential equation · 0.8linear regression · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 A Comparison of Continuous-Time Approximations to Stochastic Gradient Descent
abstract
Applying a stochastic gradient descent (SGD) method for minimizing an objective gives rise to a discrete-time process of estimated parameter values. In order to better understand the dynamics of the estimated values, many authors have considered continuous-time approximations of SGD. We refine existing results on the weak error of first-order ODE and SDE approximations to SGD for non-infinitesimal learning rates. In particular, we explicitly compute the linear term in the error expansion of gradient flow and two of its stochastic counterparts, with respect to a discretization parameter $h$. In the example of linear regression, we demonstrate the general inferiority of the deterministic gradient flow approximation in comparison to the stochastic ones, for batch sizes which are not too large. Further, we demonstrate that for Gaussian features an SDE approximation with state-independent noise (CC) is preferred over using a state-dependent coefficient (NCC). The same comparison holds true for features of low kurtosis or large batch sizes. However, the relationship reverses for highly leptokurtic features or small batch sizes.
Stefan Ankirchner, Stefan Perko
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1