Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Stefan Ankirchner
dblp:65/10624
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0001-8216-6335ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Optimization for machine learning · 50% Deep learning architectures and training · 50% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › training dynamics
optimization dynamics |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A Comparison of Continuous-Time Approximations to Stochastic Gradient Descent · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient descent |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A Comparison of Continuous-Time Approximations to Stochastic Gradient Descent · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
weak error expansion · 0.8stochastic differential equation · 0.8ordinary differential equation · 0.8linear regression · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | A Comparison of Continuous-Time Approximations to Stochastic Gradient DescentabstractApplying a stochastic gradient descent (SGD) method for minimizing an objective gives rise to a discrete-time process of estimated parameter values. In order to better understand the dynamics of the estimated values, many authors have considered continuous-time approximations of SGD. We refine existing results on the weak error of first-order ODE and SDE approximations to SGD for non-infinitesimal learning rates. In particular, we explicitly compute the linear term in the error expansion of gradient flow and two of its stochastic counterparts, with respect to a discretization parameter $h$. In the example of linear regression, we demonstrate the general inferiority of the deterministic gradient flow approximation in comparison to the stochastic ones, for batch sizes which are not too large. Further, we demonstrate that for Gaussian features an SDE approximation with state-independent noise (CC) is preferred over using a state-dependent coefficient (NCC). The same comparison holds true for features of low kurtosis or large batch sizes. However, the relationship reverses for highly leptokurtic features or small batch sizes. Stefan Ankirchner, Stefan Perko |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |