Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nathan Collins

dblp:65/10809 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3Theory of computation · 2Security and privacy · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
3 papers
Systems and software security · 61% Cyber-physical and IoT security · 39%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
3 papers
Program verification · 64% Operating systems · 36%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cyber-physical and IoT security
vehicular network security
0.312018
Formal Verification of a Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) Messaging System · CAV (2) 2018
Systems and software security
information flow control
0.212014
A verified information-flow architecture · POPL 2014
Operating systems › system security › operating system security
secure operating system
0.112014
A verified information-flow architecture · POPL 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

symbolic simulation · 0.7ASN.1 compiler · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Continuous Formal Verification of Amazon s2n
Andrey Chudnov, Nathan Collins, Byron Cook, Joey Dodds, Brian Huffman, Colm MacCárthaigh, Stephen Magill, Eric Mertens, Eric Mullen, Serdar Tasiran, Aaron Tomb, Eddy Westbrook
CAV (2)2
2018 Formal Verification of a Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) Messaging System
abstract
Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) communications is a “connected vehicles” standard that will likely be mandated in the U.S. within the coming decade. V2V, in which automobiles broadcast to one another, promises improved safety by providing collision warnings, but it also poses a security risk. At the heart of V2V is the communication messaging system, specified in SAE J2735 using the Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1) data-description language. Motivated by numerous previous ASN.1 related vulnerabilities, we present the formal verification of an ASN.1 encode/decode pair. We describe how we generate the implementation in C using our ASN.1 compiler. We define self-consistency for encode/decode pairs that approximates functional correctness without requiring a formal specification of ASN.1. We then verify self-consistency and memory safety using symbolic simulation via the Software Analysis Workbench .
Mark Tullsen, Lee Pike, Nathan Collins, Aaron Tomb
CAV (2)3
2016 A verified information-flow architecture
abstract
SAFE is a clean-slate design for a highly secure computer system, with pervasive mechanisms for tracking and limiting information flows. At the lowest level, the SAFE hardware supports fine-grained programmable tags, with efficient and flexible propagation and combination of tags as instructions ar e executed. The operating system virtualizes these generic facilities to present an information-flow abstract machine that allows user programs to label sensitive data with rich confidentiality policies. We present a formal, machine-checked model of the key hardware and software mechanisms used to dynamically control information flow in SAFE and an end-to-end proof of noninterference for this model. We use a refinement proof methodology to propagate the noninterference property of the abstract machine down to the concrete machine level. We use an intermediate layer in the refinement chain that factors out the details of the information-flow control policy and devise a code generator for compiling such information-flow policies into low-level monitor code. Finally, we verify the correctness of this generator using a dedicated Hoare logic that abstracts from low-level machine instructions into a reusable set of verified structured code generators.
Arthur Azevedo de Amorim, Nathan Collins, André DeHon, Delphine Demange, Catalin Hritcu, David Pichardie, Benjamin C. Pierce, Randy Pollack, Andrew P. Tolmach
J. Comput. Secur.2
2014 A verified information-flow architecture
abstract
SAFE is a clean-slate design for a highly secure computer system, with pervasive mechanisms for tracking and limiting information flows. At the lowest level, the SAFE hardware supports fine-grained programmable tags, with efficient and flexible propagation and combination of tags as instructions are executed. The operating system virtualizes these generic facilities to present an information-flow abstract machine that allows user programs to label sensitive data with rich confidentiality policies. We present a formal, machine-checked model of the key hardware and software mechanisms used to control information flow in SAFE and an end-to-end proof of noninterference for this model.
Arthur Azevedo de Amorim, Nathan Collins, André DeHon, Delphine Demange, Catalin Hritcu, David Pichardie, Benjamin C. Pierce, Randy Pollack, Andrew P. Tolmach
POPL2