Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

John R. Rebula

dblp:65/140 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
0000-0002-0288-9486ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 5 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Motion planning and robot control · 48% Legged, aerial and field robots · 30% Robot navigation and mapping · 12%

Topics — the 14 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.222008
Learning Capture Points for Bipedal Push Recovery · ICRA 2008
A Controller for the LittleDog Quadruped Walking on Rough Terrain · ICRA 2007
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › legged robots › legged robot locomotion
bipedal locomotion
0.112008
Learning Capture Points for Bipedal Push Recovery · ICRA 2008
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
hierarchical planning
0.112008
Hierarchical two stage planner for little dog · ICRA 2008
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
motion planning
0.112008
Hierarchical two stage planner for little dog · ICRA 2008
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › dynamic stability
push recovery
0.112008
Learning Capture Points for Bipedal Push Recovery · ICRA 2008
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › robot mapping
terrain mapping
0.112008
Learning terrain cost maps · ICRA 2008
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
gait control
0.112007
A Controller for the LittleDog Quadruped Walking on Rough Terrain · ICRA 2007
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › legged robots › legged robot locomotion
quadruped locomotion
0.112007
A Controller for the LittleDog Quadruped Walking on Rough Terrain · ICRA 2007
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › rough terrain locomotion
rough terrain walking
0.112007
A Controller for the LittleDog Quadruped Walking on Rough Terrain · ICRA 2007
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
field robotics
0.012008
Learning terrain cost maps · ICRA 2008
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
legged robots
0.012008
Hierarchical two stage planner for little dog · ICRA 2008
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot learning
0.012008
Learning Capture Points for Bipedal Push Recovery · ICRA 2008
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › mobile robot navigation › terrain-aware navigation
rough terrain navigation
0.012008
Learning terrain cost maps · ICRA 2008
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
reactive control
0.012007
A Controller for the LittleDog Quadruped Walking on Rough Terrain · ICRA 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

radial basis functions · 0.1online and offline learning · 0.1linear inverted pendulum model · 0.1deliberative and reactive control · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2009 The Yobotics-IHMC Lower Body Humanoid Robot
abstract
This video highlights work to date on the Yobotics-IHMC lower body humanoid robot. The robot is a twelve degree-of-freedom robot with force controllable series elastic actuators at each degree of freedom. Control algorithms utilize virtual model control, and foot placement is determined using capture regions. The robot can recover from moderate disturbances and walk on flat ground. Ongoing work is focused on improving robustness to disturbances, walking more quickly and efficiently, and walking over rough terrain.
Jerry E. Pratt, Benjamin T. Krupp, Victor Ragusila, John R. Rebula, Twan Koolen, Niels van Nieuwenhuizen, Christopher Shake, Travis Craig, Greg Watkins, Peter D. Neuhaus, Matt Johnson 0001, Steve Shooter, Keith W. Buffinton, Fabian Canas, John Carff, William Howell
IROS4
2008 Hierarchical two stage planner for little dog
Brian V. Bonnlander, John R. Rebula, Peter D. Neuhaus, Matt Johnson 0001, Greg Hill, Carlos Pérez, John Carff, William Howell, Jerry E. Pratt
ICRA2
2008 Learning Capture Points for Bipedal Push Recovery
abstract
Researchers at IHMC and Honda Research Institute are developing techniques for learning capture points for bipedal push recovery. A capture point is a point on the ground where a biped can step to in order to stop. Humans are very adept at stepping to capture points, while most bipedal robots cannot recover from significant pushes. To calculate approximate capture point locations, we use the linear inverted pendulum model introduced by Kajita and Tani. For a point mass biped walking at a constant height, this model exactly predicts the capture point. However, for a distributed mass biped, it is only an approximation. In order to better predict capture points, we learn a correction function to the linear inverted pendulum model. We used two learning methods, one online and one offline, to improve capture point prediction. In the offline learning method, the robot is pushed multiple times with a given force magnitude and direction. In the online learning technique, we use a radial basis function to represent the learned offsets from the capture point predicted by the linear inverted pendulum model.
John R. Rebula, Fabian Canas, Jerry E. Pratt, Ambarish Goswami
ICRA1
2008 Learning terrain cost maps
John R. Rebula, Greg Hill, Brian V. Bonnlander, Matt Johnson 0001, Peter D. Neuhaus, Carlos Pérez, John Carff, William Howell, Jerry E. Pratt
ICRA1
2007 A Controller for the LittleDog Quadruped Walking on Rough Terrain
abstract
We present a controller for a quadrupedal robot statically walking on known rough terrain. The controller has both deliberative and reactive components for task specific control issues, such as impassable terrain and unmodeled foot slippage. The controller architecture supports multiple gaits, and we present both a stable omnidirectional gait and a faster directional gait. The robot successfully negotiates obstacles up to 7.5 cm (ap40% leg length) tall and navigates over rocky terrain.
John R. Rebula, Peter D. Neuhaus, Brian V. Bonnlander, Matt Johnson 0001, Jerry E. Pratt
ICRA1