Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Theodore N. Reed

dblp:65/1618 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 1985
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 6 · 3 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 4 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
4 papers
Rendering · 75% Multimedia systems and quality of experience · 25%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
3 papers
Requirements engineering and software design · 79% Software maintenance and evolution · 21%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Rendering
graphics standards
0.021983
Technical implications of proposed graphics standards (Panel Session) · SIGGRAPH 1983
The impact of graphics standards an American point of view (Panel Session) · SIGGRAPH 1982
Multimedia systems and quality of experience › multimedia standards
graphics metafile
0.011982
A Metafile for efficient sequential and random display of graphics · SIGGRAPH 1982
Rendering › graphics standards
device-independent graphics
0.011978
An implementation of the ACM/SIGGRAPH proposed graphics standard in a multisystem environment · SIGGRAPH 1978
Software maintenance and evolution
software portability
0.011978
An implementation of the ACM/SIGGRAPH proposed graphics standard in a multisystem environment · SIGGRAPH 1978

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

random access extensions · 0.0program overlaying · 0.0dynamic buffer sharing · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1985 Standardization of the virtual device metafile and the virtual device interface
Theodore N. Reed
Comput. Graph.1
1983 Technical implications of proposed graphics standards (Panel Session)
abstract
This panel session is intended to present recent technical developments in the efforts to standardize computer graphics.
David H. Straayer, Peter R. Bono, Richard Ehlers, Günter Enderle, Theodore N. Reed, David Shuey, Mark Skall, Elain Sonderegger, Tom Wright
SIGGRAPH5
1982 A Metafile for efficient sequential and random display of graphics
abstract
Graphics metafiles have been in use at the Los Alamos National Laboratory since early 1977. The first metafile format was defined in 1976 and has been updated several times to allow efficient graphics support in the Los Alamos computing environment. History and current applications of the Common Graphics System (CGS) Metafile are given. Design objectives, details of the format, and random access extensions incorporated in the Metafile are described.
Theodore N. Reed
SIGGRAPH1
1982 The impact of graphics standards an American point of view (Panel Session)
abstract
This panel session will consist of reports from participants in the effort to standardize computer graphics functions in America. There are two principal goals. The first is to provide status reports for the groups represented by the panelists. The second is to explain relationships between different standardization efforts.
David H. Straayer, Tom Wright, Theodore N. Reed, David Shuey, Bruce Cohen, Bradford M. Smith
SIGGRAPH3
1981 Experiences in the Design and Support of a Graphics Device Driver Interface
abstract
The Common Graphics System (CGS) was developed at the Los Alamos National Laboratory. A standard device driver interface was defined for graphics device drivers and for use by user-callable graphics subroutine packages. This paper describes the existing CGS device driver interface, the experience we gained using it, and the extended interface capable of supporting more powerful graphics devices. The relationship between this interface and the CGS Metafile is also discussed.
Theodore N. Reed
Eurographics1
1978 An implementation of the ACM/SIGGRAPH proposed graphics standard in a multisystem environment
abstract
Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory (LASL) implemented a graphics system designed to support one user interface for all graphics devices in all operating environments at LASL. The Common Graphics System (CGS) will support Level One of the graphics standard proposed by the ACM/SIGGRAPH Graphic Standards Planning Committee. CGS is available in six operating environments of two different word lengths and supports four types of graphics devices. It can generate a pseudodevice file that may be postprocessed and edited for a particular graphics device, or it can generate device-specific graphics output directly. Program overlaying and dynamic buffer sharing are also supported. CGS is structured to isolate operating system dependencies and graphics device dependencies. It is written in the RATFOR (RATional FORtran) language, which supports control flow statements and macro expansion. CGS is maintained as a single-source program from which each version can be extracted automatically. 1 figure.
Richard G. Kellner, Theodore N. Reed, Ann Solem
SIGGRAPH2