Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Theodore N. Reed
dblp:65/1618
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 1985
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 6 · 3 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 4 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
4 papers |
Rendering · 75% Multimedia systems and quality of experience · 25% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
3 papers |
Requirements engineering and software design · 79% Software maintenance and evolution · 21% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rendering
graphics standards |
0.0 | 2 | 1983 | Technical implications of proposed graphics standards (Panel Session) · SIGGRAPH 1983 The impact of graphics standards an American point of view (Panel Session) · SIGGRAPH 1982 |
Multimedia systems and quality of experience › multimedia standards
graphics metafile |
0.0 | 1 | 1982 | A Metafile for efficient sequential and random display of graphics · SIGGRAPH 1982 |
Rendering › graphics standards
device-independent graphics |
0.0 | 1 | 1978 | An implementation of the ACM/SIGGRAPH proposed graphics standard in a multisystem environment · SIGGRAPH 1978 |
Software maintenance and evolution
software portability |
0.0 | 1 | 1978 | An implementation of the ACM/SIGGRAPH proposed graphics standard in a multisystem environment · SIGGRAPH 1978 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
random access extensions · 0.0program overlaying · 0.0dynamic buffer sharing · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1985 | Standardization of the virtual device metafile and the virtual device interface
Theodore N. Reed |
Comput. Graph. | 1 |
| 1983 | Technical implications of proposed graphics standards (Panel Session)abstractThis panel session is intended to present recent technical developments in the efforts to standardize computer graphics. David H. Straayer, Peter R. Bono, Richard Ehlers, Günter Enderle, Theodore N. Reed, David Shuey, Mark Skall, Elain Sonderegger, Tom Wright |
SIGGRAPH | 5 |
| 1982 | A Metafile for efficient sequential and random display of graphicsabstractGraphics metafiles have been in use at the Los Alamos National Laboratory since early 1977. The first metafile format was defined in 1976 and has been updated several times to allow efficient graphics support in the Los Alamos computing environment. History and current applications of the Common Graphics System (CGS) Metafile are given. Design objectives, details of the format, and random access extensions incorporated in the Metafile are described. Theodore N. Reed |
SIGGRAPH | 1 |
| 1982 | The impact of graphics standards an American point of view (Panel Session)abstractThis panel session will consist of reports from participants in the effort to standardize computer graphics functions in America. There are two principal goals. The first is to provide status reports for the groups represented by the panelists. The second is to explain relationships between different standardization efforts. David H. Straayer, Tom Wright, Theodore N. Reed, David Shuey, Bruce Cohen, Bradford M. Smith |
SIGGRAPH | 3 |
| 1981 | Experiences in the Design and Support of a Graphics Device Driver InterfaceabstractThe Common Graphics System (CGS) was developed at the Los Alamos National Laboratory. A standard device driver interface was defined for graphics device drivers and for use by user-callable graphics subroutine packages. This paper describes the existing CGS device driver interface, the experience we gained using it, and the extended interface capable of supporting more powerful graphics devices. The relationship between this interface and the CGS Metafile is also discussed. Theodore N. Reed |
Eurographics | 1 |
| 1978 | An implementation of the ACM/SIGGRAPH proposed graphics standard in a multisystem environmentabstractLos Alamos Scientific Laboratory (LASL) implemented a graphics system designed to support one user interface for all graphics devices in all operating environments at LASL. The Common Graphics System (CGS) will support Level One of the graphics standard proposed by the ACM/SIGGRAPH Graphic Standards Planning Committee. CGS is available in six operating environments of two different word lengths and supports four types of graphics devices. It can generate a pseudodevice file that may be postprocessed and edited for a particular graphics device, or it can generate device-specific graphics output directly. Program overlaying and dynamic buffer sharing are also supported. CGS is structured to isolate operating system dependencies and graphics device dependencies. It is written in the RATFOR (RATional FORtran) language, which supports control flow statements and macro expansion. CGS is maintained as a single-source program from which each version can be extracted automatically. 1 figure. Richard G. Kellner, Theodore N. Reed, Ann Solem |
SIGGRAPH | 2 |