Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sadaf Zahedi

dblp:65/1845 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 4Computer networks · 3Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
3 papers
Internet of things and sensor networks · 67% Physical-layer communications · 22% Wireless sensing and localization · 11%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Energy-efficient computing · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Internet of things and sensor networks
wireless sensor network
0.332010
Quality Tradeoffs in Object Tracking with Duty-Cycled Sensor Networks · RTSS 2010
Compressive Oversampling for Robust Data Transmission in Sensor Networks · INFOCOM 2010
Heliomote: enabling long-lived sensor networks through solar energy harvesting · SenSys 2005
Wireless sensing and localization › tracking
bearing-only tracking
0.112010
Quality Tradeoffs in Object Tracking with Duty-Cycled Sensor Networks · RTSS 2010
Physical-layer communications › signal processing for communications
compressive sensing
0.112010
Compressive Oversampling for Robust Data Transmission in Sensor Networks · INFOCOM 2010
Internet of things and sensor networks › wireless sensor network
duty cycling
0.112010
Quality Tradeoffs in Object Tracking with Duty-Cycled Sensor Networks · RTSS 2010
Internet of things and sensor networks
erasure coding
0.112010
Compressive Oversampling for Robust Data Transmission in Sensor Networks · INFOCOM 2010
Physical-layer communications
signal processing for communications
0.112010
Compressive Oversampling for Robust Data Transmission in Sensor Networks · INFOCOM 2010
Internet of things and sensor networks › wireless sensor network
target tracking
0.112010
Quality Tradeoffs in Object Tracking with Duty-Cycled Sensor Networks · RTSS 2010
Internet of things and sensor networks
energy harvesting
0.112005
Heliomote: enabling long-lived sensor networks through solar energy harvesting · SenSys 2005
Energy-efficient computing
power management
0.012005
Heliomote: enabling long-lived sensor networks through solar energy harvesting · SenSys 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

maximum likelihood localization · 0.1compressive sensing · 0.1BCH codes · 0.1solar energy harvesting · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 Variability-aware duty cycle scheduling in long running embedded sensing systems
abstract
Instance and temperature-dependent leakage power variability is already a significant issue in contemporary embedded processors, and one which is expected to increase in importance with scaling of semiconductor technology. We measure and characterize this leakage power variability in current microprocessors, and show that variability aware duty cycle scheduling produces 7.1× improvement in sensing quality for a desired lifetime. In contrast, pessimistic estimations of power consumption leave 61% of the energy untapped, and datasheet power specifications fail to meet required lifetimes by 14%. Finally, we introduce a duty cycle abstraction for TinyOS that allows applications to explicitly specify lifetime and minimum duty cycle requirements for individual tasks, and dynamically adjusts duty cycle rates so that overall quality of service is maximized in the presence of power variability.
Lucas Francisco Wanner, Rahul Balani, Sadaf Zahedi, Charwak Apte, Puneet Gupta 0001, Mani Srivastava 0001
DATE3
2010 Compressive Oversampling for Robust Data Transmission in Sensor Networks
abstract
Data loss in wireless sensing applications is inevitable and while there have been many attempts at coping with this issue, recent developments in the area of Compressive Sensing (CS) provide a new and attractive perspective. Since many physical signals of interest are known to be sparse or compressible, employing CS, not only compresses the data and reduces effective transmission rate, but also improves the robustness of the system to channel erasures. This is possible because reconstruction algorithms for compressively sampled signals are not hampered by the stochastic nature of wireless link disturbances, which has traditionally plagued attempts at proactively handling the effects of these errors. In this paper, we propose that if CS is employed for source compression, then CS can further be exploited as an application layer erasure coding strategy for recovering missing data. We show that CS erasure encoding (CSEC) with random sampling is efficient for handling missing data in erasure channels, paralleling the performance of BCH codes, with the added benefit of graceful degradation of the reconstruction error even when the amount of missing data far exceeds the designed redundancy. Further, since CSEC is equivalent to nominal oversampling in the incoherent measurement basis, it is computationally cheaper than conventional erasure coding. We support our proposal through extensive performance studies.
Zainul Charbiwala, Supriyo Chakraborty, Sadaf Zahedi, Younghun Kim, Ting He 0001, Chatschik Bisdikian, Mani Srivastava 0001
INFOCOM3
2010 Quality Tradeoffs in Object Tracking with Duty-Cycled Sensor Networks
abstract
Extending the lifetime of wireless sensor networks requires energy-conserving operations such as duty-cycling. However, such operations may impact the effectiveness of high fidelity real-time sensing tasks, such as object tracking, which require high accuracy and short response times. In this paper, we quantify the influence of different duty-cycle schemes on the efficiency of bearings-only object tracking. Specifically, we use the Maximum Likelihood localization technique to analyze the accuracy limits of object location estimates under different response latencies considering variable network density and duty-cycle parameters. Moreover, we study the tradeoffs between accuracy and response latency under various scenarios and motion patterns of the object. We have also investigated the effects of different duty-cycled schedules on the tracking accuracy using acoustic sensor data collected at Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, by the U.S. Army Research Laboratory (ARL).
Sadaf Zahedi, Mani Srivastava 0001, Chatschik Bisdikian, Lance M. Kaplan
RTSS1
2009 Energy efficient sampling for event detection in wireless sensor networks
abstract
Compressive Sensing (CS) is a recently developed mechanism that allows signal acquisition and compression to be performed in one inexpensive step so that the sampling process itself produces a compressed version of the signal. This significantly improves systemic energy efficiency because the average sampling rate can be considerably reduced and explicit compression eliminated.
Zainul Charbiwala, Younghun Kim, Sadaf Zahedi, Jonathan Friedman, Mani Srivastava 0001
ISLPED3
2009 Sensor network data fault types
abstract
This tutorial presents a detailed study of sensor faults that occur in deployed sensor networks and a systematic approach to model these faults. We begin by reviewing the fault detection literature for sensor networks. We draw from current literature, our own experience, and data collected from scientific deployments to develop a set of commonly used features useful in detecting and diagnosing sensor faults. We use this feature set to systematically define commonly observed faults, and provide examples of each of these faults from sensor data collected at recent deployments.
Kevin Ni, Nithya Ramanathan, Mohamed Nabil Hajj Chehade, Laura Balzano, Sheela Nair, Sadaf Zahedi, Eddie Kohler, Gregory J. Pottie, Mark H. Hansen, Mani Srivastava 0001
ACM Trans. Sens. Networks6
2007 Power management in energy harvesting sensor networks
abstract
Power management is an important concern in sensor networks, because a tethered energy infrastructure is usually not available and an obvious concern is to use the available battery energy efficiently. However, in some of the sensor networking applications, an additional facility is available to ameliorate the energy problem: harvesting energy from the environment. Certain considerations in using an energy harvesting source are fundamentally different from that in using a battery, because, rather than a limit on the maximum energy, it has a limit on the maximum rate at which the energy can be used. Further, the harvested energy availability typically varies with time in a nondeterministic manner. While a deterministic metric, such as residual battery, suffices to characterize the energy availability in the case of batteries, a more sophisticated characterization may be required for a harvesting source. Another issue that becomes important in networked systems with multiple harvesting nodes is that different nodes may have different harvesting opportunity. In a distributed application, the same end-user performance may be achieved using different workload allocations, and resultant energy consumptions at multiple nodes. In this case, it is important to align the workload allocation with the energy availability at the harvesting nodes. We consider the above issues in power management for energy-harvesting sensor networks. We develop abstractions to characterize the complex time varying nature of such sources with analytically tractable models and use them to address key design issues. We also develop distributed methods to efficiently use harvested energy and test these both in simulation and experimentally on an energy-harvesting sensor network, prototyped for this work.
Aman Kansal, Jason Hsu, Sadaf Zahedi, Mani Srivastava 0001
ACM Trans. Embed. Comput. Syst.3
2006 Adaptive duty cycling for energy harvesting systems
abstract
Harvesting energy from the environment is feasible in many applications to ameliorate the energy limitations in sensor networks. In this paper, we present an adaptive duty cycling algorithm that allows energy harvesting sensor nodes to autonomously adjust their duty cycle according to the energy availability in the environment. The algorithm has three objectives, namely (a) achieving energy neutral operation, i.e., energy consumption should not be more than the energy provided by the environment, (b) maximizing the system performance based on an application utility model subject to the above energy-neutrality constraint, and (c) adapting to the dynamics of the energy source at run-time. We present a model that enables harvesting sensor nodes to predict future energy opportunities based on historical data. We also derive an upper bound on the maximum achievable performance assuming perfect knowledge about the future behavior of the energy source. Our methods are evaluated using data gathered from a prototype solar energy harvesting platform and we show that our algorithm can utilize up to 58% more environmental energy compared to the case when harvesting-aware power management is not used.
Jason Hsu, Sadaf Zahedi, Aman Kansal, Mani Srivastava 0001, Vijay Raghunathan
ISLPED2
2005 Heliomote: enabling long-lived sensor networks through solar energy harvesting
abstract
No abstract available.
Kris Lin, Jennifer Yu, Jason Hsu, Sadaf Zahedi, Jonathan Friedman, Aman Kansal, Vijay Raghunathan, Mani Srivastava 0001
SenSys4