Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Marius Olafsson

dblp:65/2320 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1982
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Electronic design automation · 70% Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 30%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation › design representation
architecture description language
0.011982
Towards a family of languages for the design and implementation of machine architectures · ISCA 1982
Electronic design automation › design methodology
hardware design methodology
0.011982
Towards a family of languages for the design and implementation of machine architectures · ISCA 1982
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
microprogramming
0.011982
Towards a family of languages for the design and implementation of machine architectures · ISCA 1982
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
hardware verification
0.011982
Towards a family of languages for the design and implementation of machine architectures · ISCA 1982
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1982 Towards a family of languages for the design and implementation of machine architectures
abstract
In recent years, increases in complexity of hardware/firmware systems, and the concern for systems reliability have resulted in growing interest in methodologies and tools for the design, description and verification of computer systems. A vital component of any such design methodology is the language used for representing the design. In the case of particularly complex systems the design process may involve a succession of stages each of which represents the system at a particular level of abstraction. In such situations several languages may be required, each suited to a particular level of abstraction. We present here, one such family of languages , consisting at present of two members, S*A, an architectural description language, and S*, a high level microprogramming language schema. These closely related (“kin”) languages may be used collaboratively for the systematic, top-down development of an architecture, down to the microcode level. The resulting descriptions of the architecture provide, in addition, a complete unified document of the multilevel design process.
Subrata Dasgupta, Marius Olafsson
ISCA2