Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Florent Vial
dblp:65/3693
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
3D vision · 50% Video understanding and tracking · 50% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Virtual and augmented reality · 77% Geometric modeling and processing · 23% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › 3D vision
camera pose estimation |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Adaptive Line Tracking with Multiple Hypotheses for Augmented Reality · ISMAR 2005 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › object tracking
edge-based tracking |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Adaptive Line Tracking with Multiple Hypotheses for Augmented Reality · ISMAR 2005 |
Virtual and augmented reality › tracking
model-based tracking |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Adaptive Line Tracking with Multiple Hypotheses for Augmented Reality · ISMAR 2005 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multiple hypothesis tracking · 0.1gradient search · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | Adaptive Line Tracking with Multiple Hypotheses for Augmented RealityabstractWe present a real-time model-based line tracking approach with adaptive learning of image edge features that can handle partial occlusion and illumination changes. A CAD (VRML) model of the object to track is needed. First, the visible edges of the model with respect to the camera pose estimate are sorted out by a visibility test performed on standard graphics hardware. For every sample point of every projected visible 3D model line a search for gradient maxima in the image is then carried out in a direction perpendicular to that line. Multiple hypotheses of these maxima are considered as putative matches. The camera pose is updated by minimizing the distances between the projection of all sample points of the visible 3D model lines and the most likely matches found in the image. The state of every edge's visual properties is updated after each successful camera pose estimation. We evaluated the algorithm and showed the improvements compared to other tracking approaches. Harald Wuest, Florent Vial, Didier Stricker |
ISMAR | 2 |