Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Florent Vial

dblp:65/3693 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
3D vision · 50% Video understanding and tracking · 50%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Virtual and augmented reality · 77% Geometric modeling and processing · 23%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision
camera pose estimation
0.112005
Adaptive Line Tracking with Multiple Hypotheses for Augmented Reality · ISMAR 2005
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › object tracking
edge-based tracking
0.112005
Adaptive Line Tracking with Multiple Hypotheses for Augmented Reality · ISMAR 2005
Virtual and augmented reality › tracking
model-based tracking
0.112005
Adaptive Line Tracking with Multiple Hypotheses for Augmented Reality · ISMAR 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multiple hypothesis tracking · 0.1gradient search · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2005 Adaptive Line Tracking with Multiple Hypotheses for Augmented Reality
abstract
We present a real-time model-based line tracking approach with adaptive learning of image edge features that can handle partial occlusion and illumination changes. A CAD (VRML) model of the object to track is needed. First, the visible edges of the model with respect to the camera pose estimate are sorted out by a visibility test performed on standard graphics hardware. For every sample point of every projected visible 3D model line a search for gradient maxima in the image is then carried out in a direction perpendicular to that line. Multiple hypotheses of these maxima are considered as putative matches. The camera pose is updated by minimizing the distances between the projection of all sample points of the visible 3D model lines and the most likely matches found in the image. The state of every edge's visual properties is updated after each successful camera pose estimation. We evaluated the algorithm and showed the improvements compared to other tracking approaches.
Harald Wuest, Florent Vial, Didier Stricker
ISMAR2