VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sara Shanian
dblp:65/4128
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Learning theory · 48% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 25% Deep learning architectures and training · 13% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software testing · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds
PAC-Bayes bounds |
0.2 | 2 | 2011 | A PAC-Bayes Sample-compression Approach to Kernel Methods · ICML 2011 From PAC-Bayes Bounds to KL Regularization · NIPS 2009 |
Software testing
test maintenance |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Resilient user interface level tests · ASE 2014 |
Software testing
UI testing |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Resilient user interface level tests · ASE 2014 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
kernel methods |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | A PAC-Bayes Sample-compression Approach to Kernel Methods · ICML 2011 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds
sample compression bounds |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | A PAC-Bayes Sample-compression Approach to Kernel Methods · ICML 2011 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › regularization for reinforcement learning
KL regularization |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | From PAC-Bayes Bounds to KL Regularization · NIPS 2009 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
regularization |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | From PAC-Bayes Bounds to KL Regularization · NIPS 2009 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › ensemble learning
boosting |
0.0 | 1 | 2009 | From PAC-Bayes Bounds to KL Regularization · NIPS 2009 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
ensemble learning |
0.0 | 1 | 2009 | From PAC-Bayes Bounds to KL Regularization · NIPS 2009 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sample compression · 0.1PAC-Bayes · 0.1coordinate descent · 0.1convex optimization · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | Resilient user interface level testsabstractAbout 60% of the software development cost for online applications is related to developing user interfaces commonly used by the end users to interact with those applications. Frequent small changes to user interfaces (UIs) however easily break about 70% of the test cases intended to mimic users' interactions. Fixing broken tests results in extra costs of maintenance while lessening the benefits of test automation. One of the biggest challenges in creating resilient UI level test cases is to identify and locate the elements of the UI in a way that small UI changes do not break the way in which an element was originally located. Heidar Pirzadeh, Sara Shanian |
ASE | 2 |
| 2013 | Stratified sampling of execution traces: Execution phases serving as strata
Heidar Pirzadeh, Sara Shanian, Abdelwahab Hamou-Lhadj, Luay Alawneh, Arya Shafiee |
Sci. Comput. Program. | 2 |
| 2011 | A PAC-Bayes Sample-compression Approach to Kernel Methods
Pascal Germain, Alexandre Lacoste, François Laviolette, Mario Marchand, Sara Shanian |
ICML | 5 |
| 2011 | The Concept of Stratified Sampling of Execution TracesabstractExecution traces can be overwhelmingly large. To reduce their size, sampling techniques, especially the ones based on random sampling, have been extensively used. Random sampling, however, may result in samples that are not representative of the original trace. We propose a trace sampling framework based on stratified sampling that not only reduces the size of a trace but also results in a sample that is representative of the original trace by ensuring that the desired characteristics of an execution are distributed similarly in both the sampled and the original trace. Heidar Pirzadeh, Sara Shanian, Abdelwahab Hamou-Lhadj, Ali Mehrabian |
ICPC | 2 |
| 2010 | Learning the set covering machine by bound minimization and margin-sparsity trade-off
François Laviolette, Mario Marchand, Mohak Shah, Sara Shanian |
Mach. Learn. | 4 |
| 2009 | From PAC-Bayes Bounds to KL RegularizationabstractWe show that convex KL-regularized objective functions are obtained from a PAC-Bayes risk bound when using convex loss functions for the stochastic Gibbs classifier that upper-bound the standard zero-one loss used for the weighted majority vote. By restricting ourselves to a class of posteriors, that we call quasi uniform, we propose a simple coordinate descent learning algorithm to minimize the proposed KL-regularized cost function. We show that standard ellp-regularized objective functions currently used, such as ridge regression and ellp-regularized boosting, are obtained from a relaxation of the KL divergence between the quasi uniform posterior and the uniform prior. We present numerical experiments where the proposed learning algorithm generally outperforms ridge regression and AdaBoost. Pascal Germain, Alexandre Lacasse, François Laviolette, Mario Marchand, Sara Shanian |
NIPS | 5 |