Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Demos Anastasakis

dblp:65/4799 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2004
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Electronic design automation · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
hardware verification
0.122004
Efficient equivalence checking with partitions and hierarchical cut-points · DAC 2004
A practical and efficient method for compare-point matching · DAC 2002
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › formal verification
combinational equivalence checking
0.012004
Efficient equivalence checking with partitions and hierarchical cut-points · DAC 2004
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › formal verification
equivalence checking
0.012002
A practical and efficient method for compare-point matching · DAC 2002

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

partitioning · 0.0heuristic algorithm · 0.0ATPG-based matching · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2004 Efficient equivalence checking with partitions and hierarchical cut-points
abstract
Previous results show that both flat and hierarchical methodologies present obstacles to effectively completing combinational equivalence checking. A new approach that combines the benefits while effectively dealing with the pitfalls of both styles of equivalence checking is presented.
Demos Anastasakis, Lisa McIlwain, Slawomir Pilarski
DAC1
2002 A practical and efficient method for compare-point matching
abstract
An important step in using combinational equivalence checkers to verify sequential designs is identifying and matching corresponding compare-points in the two sequential designs to be verified. Both non-function and function-based matching methods are usually employed in commercial verification tools. In this paper, we describe a heuristic algorithm using ATPG for matching comparepoints based on the functionality of the combinational blocks in the sequential designs. Results on industrial-sized circuits show our methods are both practical and efficient.
Demos Anastasakis, Robert F. Damiano, Hi-Keung Tony Ma, Ted Stanion
DAC1