Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Demos Anastasakis
dblp:65/4799
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2004
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Electronic design automation · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
hardware verification |
0.1 | 2 | 2004 | Efficient equivalence checking with partitions and hierarchical cut-points · DAC 2004 A practical and efficient method for compare-point matching · DAC 2002 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › formal verification
combinational equivalence checking |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Efficient equivalence checking with partitions and hierarchical cut-points · DAC 2004 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › formal verification
equivalence checking |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | A practical and efficient method for compare-point matching · DAC 2002 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
partitioning · 0.0heuristic algorithm · 0.0ATPG-based matching · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | Efficient equivalence checking with partitions and hierarchical cut-pointsabstractPrevious results show that both flat and hierarchical methodologies present obstacles to effectively completing combinational equivalence checking. A new approach that combines the benefits while effectively dealing with the pitfalls of both styles of equivalence checking is presented. Demos Anastasakis, Lisa McIlwain, Slawomir Pilarski |
DAC | 1 |
| 2002 | A practical and efficient method for compare-point matchingabstractAn important step in using combinational equivalence checkers to verify sequential designs is identifying and matching corresponding compare-points in the two sequential designs to be verified. Both non-function and function-based matching methods are usually employed in commercial verification tools. In this paper, we describe a heuristic algorithm using ATPG for matching comparepoints based on the functionality of the combinational blocks in the sequential designs. Results on industrial-sized circuits show our methods are both practical and efficient. Demos Anastasakis, Robert F. Damiano, Hi-Keung Tony Ma, Ted Stanion |
DAC | 1 |