Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shaul Marcus
dblp:65/4945
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1995
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 50% Information extraction and text analysis · 50% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
distributional semantics |
0.0 | 1 | 1993 | Contextual Word Similarity and Estimation from Sparse Data · ACL 1993 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling
smoothing |
0.0 | 1 | 1993 | Contextual Word Similarity and Estimation from Sparse Data · ACL 1993 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling
statistical language modeling |
0.0 | 1 | 1993 | Contextual Word Similarity and Estimation from Sparse Data · ACL 1993 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › text similarity › semantic similarity
word similarity |
0.0 | 1 | 1993 | Contextual Word Similarity and Estimation from Sparse Data · ACL 1993 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
smoothing · 0.0similarity-based estimation · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1995 | Contextual word similarity and estimation from sparse data
Ido Dagan, Shaul Marcus, Shaul Markovitch |
Comput. Speech Lang. | 2 |
| 1993 | Contextual Word Similarity and Estimation from Sparse DataabstractIn recent years there is much interest in word cooccurrence relations, such as n-grams, verb-object combinations, or cooccurrence within a limited context. This paper discusses how to estimate the probability of cooccurrences that do not occur in the training data. We present a method that makes local analogies between each specific unobserved cooccurrence and other cooccurrences that contain similar words, as determined by an appropriate word similarity metric. Our evaluation suggests that this method performs better than existing smoothing methods, and may provide an alternative to class based models. Ido Dagan, Shaul Marcus, Shaul Markovitch |
ACL | 2 |