Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Bharath K. Kadaba

dblp:65/6463 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1993
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 5Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
4 papers
Routing and switching · 57% Internet architecture and protocols · 20% Internet of things and sensor networks · 17%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Memory systems · 67% Distributed systems · 33%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Internet architecture and protocols › high-speed networks
gigabit networking
0.011992
An Overview of the AURORA Gigabit Testbed · INFOCOM 1992
Internet of things and sensor networks › wireless sensor network
testbed
0.011992
An Overview of the AURORA Gigabit Testbed · INFOCOM 1992
Memory systems
cache
0.011989
Analysis of a Class of Distributed Directory Algorithms · INFOCOM 1989
Memory systems › cache management
cache replacement
0.011989
Analysis of a Class of Distributed Directory Algorithms · INFOCOM 1989
Distributed systems › middleware
directory service
0.011989
Analysis of a Class of Distributed Directory Algorithms · INFOCOM 1989
Routing and switching › routing › hierarchical routing
cluster-based routing
0.011988
Distributed routing using topology database in large computer networks · INFOCOM 1988
Routing and switching › routing
distributed routing
0.011988
Distributed routing using topology database in large computer networks · INFOCOM 1988
Routing and switching › routing
hierarchical routing
0.011988
Distributed routing using topology database in large computer networks · INFOCOM 1988
Routing and switching
routing
0.011988
Selective load redistribution in packet-switched networks · INFOCOM 1988
Routing and switching
routing algorithms
0.011988
Distributed routing using topology database in large computer networks · INFOCOM 1988
Routing and switching › packet switching
virtual circuit
0.011988
Selective load redistribution in packet-switched networks · INFOCOM 1988
Network performance modeling › protocol performance analysis
routing performance
0.011988
Selective load redistribution in packet-switched networks · INFOCOM 1988

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation · 0.0analytic modeling · 0.0shortest path computation · 0.0distributed algorithm · 0.0broadcast search · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1993 The AURORA Gigabit Testbed
David D. Clark, Bruce S. Davie, David J. Farber, Inder S. Gopal, Bharath K. Kadaba, W. David Sincoskie, Jonathan M. Smith, David L. Tennenhouse
Comput. Networks ISDN Syst.5
1992 An Overview of the AURORA Gigabit Testbed
abstract
AURORA is one of five US testbeds charged with exploring applications of, and technologies necessary for, networks operating at gigabit per second or higher bandwidths. The authors provide an overview of the goals and methodologies employed in AURORA and report preliminary results from the first year of research. AURORA is an experiment in collaboration, where government support has spurred interaction among centers of excellence in industry, academia, and government. The emphasis of the AURORA testbed is research into the supporting technologies for gigabit networking. The targets include new software architectures, network abstractions, hardware technologies, and applications. The AURORA testbed will provide a platform in which researchers can explore business and scientific applications of gigabit networks, while evolving the network architecture to meet the needs of these emerging applications.>
David D. Clark, David L. Tennenhouse, David J. Farber, Jonathan M. Smith, Bruce S. Davie, W. David Sincoskie, Inder S. Gopal, Bharath K. Kadaba
INFOCOM8
1989 Analysis of a Class of Distributed Directory Algorithms
abstract
Three directory schemes are investigated: the local cache (LC) scheme in which there is a cache at the network nodes to store the results of a previous query for a remote resource so that a subsequent query for that resource can be resolved locally, and two enhancements of this scheme, namely the regional cache server (RCS) scheme and the cooperating cache servers (CCS) scheme, in which the queries not resolved locally are funneled through designated nodes or servers to reduce multiple network searchers for a given resource. The performance of these schemes in terms of the network search rate is dependent on the cache sizes at the nodes and servers, the probability distribution for queuing resources, and the cache replacement policy used to displace resources from the cache to accommodate newly discovered ones. Two policies are investigated: A/sub 0/, which is the optimal policy for the LC scheme, and the least recently used policy, which is of practical importance.>
Prabandham M. Gopal, Bharath K. Kadaba
INFOCOM2
1989 Network Delay Considerations for Packetized Voice
Prabandham M. Gopal, Bharath K. Kadaba
Perform. Evaluation2
1988 Selective load redistribution in packet-switched networks
abstract
A design is presented for rerouting existing sessions (virtual circuits) under certain conditions to improve the routing performance. The authors call this mechanism selective load redistribution (SLRD). SLRD is a fully distributed algorithm which redistributes sessions in parallel at different nodes by carefully selecting the amount of traffic to be switched. The performance of the algorithm is evaluated by a simulation model. The results for several sample networks show that the algorithm performs very well even though the information available to the nodes for route computation may not be completely accurate.>
Prabandham M. Gopal, Bharath K. Kadaba
INFOCOM2
1988 Distributed routing using topology database in large computer networks
abstract
The authors develop distributed routing algorithms for large computer networks that provide virtual circuit connections to end users. One routing scheme in computer networks is to use a topology database maintained at each node that contains information about nodes and link cost. Using this information, each node finds shortest routes to other nodes. This scheme may be inefficient in large networks since the overhead associated with topology database update and shortest path computation may become large. One way of solving this problem is to partition the network into subnetworks or clusters. After partitioning, each node in a cluster only maintains a topology database of nodes and links in its own cluster and possibly marginal information about the entire network. For intracluster communication, shortest path routes are provided. For intercluster communication the source node collaborates with other nodes to find a path to the destination node. The authors propose two collaboration schemes that use simple protocols among network nodes. In one scheme, a broadcast search is used to find a path to the destination node in other clusters. In the other scheme each node maintains information about intercluster links on an up/down basis as well as complete topology database of its own cluster. Using this information, it finds a path to the destination node with the help of border nodes (nodes sharing intercluster links) in the intermediate clusters.>
Kyoo Jeong Lee, Bharath K. Kadaba
INFOCOM2