Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Avinash Kumar 0005
dblp:65/6522-5
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0002-9811-8722ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Motion planning and robot control · 67% Robot manipulation · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Robot manipulation
contact-rich manipulation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Residual Reinforcement Learning for Robot Control · ICRA 2019 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › learning control
residual reinforcement learning control |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Residual Reinforcement Learning for Robot Control · ICRA 2019 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Residual Reinforcement Learning for Robot Control · ICRA 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reinforcement learning · 0.4feedback control · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Residual Reinforcement Learning for Robot ControlabstractConventional feedback control methods can solve various types of robot control problems very efficiently by capturing the structure with explicit models, such as rigid body equations of motion. However, many control problems in modern manufacturing deal with contacts and friction, which are difficult to capture with first-order physical modeling. Hence, applying control design methodologies to these kinds of problems often results in brittle and inaccurate controllers, which have to be manually tuned for deployment. Reinforcement learning (RL) methods have been demonstrated to be capable of learning continuous robot controllers from interactions with the environment, even for problems that include friction and contacts. In this paper, we study how we can solve difficult control problems in the real world by decomposing them into a part that is solved efficiently by conventional feedback control methods, and the residual which is solved with RL. The final control policy is a superposition of both control signals. We demonstrate our approach by training an agent to successfully perform a real-world block assembly task involving contacts and unstable objects. Tobias Johannink, Shikhar Bahl, Ashvin Nair, Jianlan Luo, Avinash Kumar 0005, Matthias Loskyll, Juan Aparicio Ojea, Eugen Solowjow, Sergey Levine |
ICRA | 5 |
| 2019 | A Synchro-phasor Assisted Optimal Features Based Scheme for Fault Detection and Classification
Homanga Bharadhwaj, Avinash Kumar 0005, Abheejeet Mohapatra |
IJCNN | 2 |