Datasets often include noisy labels, but learning from them is difficult. Since mislabeled examples usually have larger loss values in training, the small-loss trick is regarded as a standard metric to identify the clean example from the training set for better performance. Nonetheless, this proposal ignores that some clean but hard-to-learn examples also generate large losses. They could be misidentified by this criterion. In this paper, we propose a new metric called the Integrated Area Margin (IAM), which is superior to the traditional small-loss trick, particularly in recognizing the clean but hard-to-learn examples. According to the IAM, we further offer the Hyperspherical Margin Weighting (HMW) approach. It is a new sample weighting strategy that restructures the importance of each example. It should be highlighted that our approach is universal and can strengthen various methods in this field. Experiments on both benchmark and real-world datasets indicate that our HMW outperforms many state-of-the-art approaches in learning with noisy label tasks. Codes are available at https://github.com/Zhangshuojackpot/HMW.

Noisy labels are often encountered in datasets, but learning with them is challenging. Although natural discrepancies between clean and mislabeled samples in a noisy category exist, most techniques in this field still gather them indiscriminately, which leads to their performances being partially robust. In this paper, we reveal both empirically and theoretically that the learning robustness can be improved by assuming deep features with the same labels follow a student distribution, resulting in a more intuitive method called student loss. By embedding the student distribution and exploiting the sharpness of its curve, our method is naturally data-selective and can offer extra strength to resist mislabeled samples. This ability makes clean samples aggregate tightly in the center, while mislabeled samples scatter, even if they share the same label. Additionally, we employ the metric learning strategy and develop a large-margin student (LT) loss for better capability. It should be noted that our approach is the first work that adopts the prior probability assumption in feature representation to decrease the contributions of mislabeled samples. This strategy can enhance various losses to join the student loss family, even if they have been robust losses. Experiments demonstrate that our approach is more effective in inaccurate supervision. Enhanced LT losses significantly outperform various state-of-the-art methods in most cases. Even huge improvements of over 50% can be obtained under some conditions.

Precise segmentation is a vital first step to analyze semantic information of cardiac cycle and capture anomaly with cardiovascular signals. However, in the field of deep semantic segmentation, inference is often unilaterally confounded by the individual attribute of data. Towards cardiovascular signals, quasi-periodicity is the essential characteristic to be learned, regarded as the synthesize of the attributes of morphology ($A_{m}$) and rhythm ($A_{r}$). Our key insight is to suppress the over-dependence on$A_{m}$or$A_{r}$while the generation process of deep representations. To address this issue, we establish a structural causal model as the foundation to customize the intervention approaches on$A_{m}$and$A_{r}$, respectively. In this article, we propose contrastive causal intervention (CCI) to form a novel training paradigm under a frame-level contrastive framework. The intervention can eliminate the implicit statistical bias brought by the single attribute and lead to more objective representations. We conduct comprehensive experiments with the controlled condition for QRS location and heart sound segmentation. The final results indicate that our approach can evidently improve the performance by up to 0.41% for QRS location and 2.73% for heart sound segmentation. The efficiency of the proposed method is generalized to multiple databases and noisy signals.