Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Gai Shaked

dblp:66/10064 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Electronic design automation · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
coverage-driven verification
0.112011
Learning microarchitectural behaviors to improve stimuli generation quality · DAC 2011
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
hardware verification
0.112011
Learning microarchitectural behaviors to improve stimuli generation quality · DAC 2011
Electronic design automation › hardware test
test stimulus generation
0.112011
Learning microarchitectural behaviors to improve stimuli generation quality · DAC 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

decision tree learning · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 Learning microarchitectural behaviors to improve stimuli generation quality
abstract
Microarchitectural information regarding various aspects of instruction execution can help processor-level stimuli generators more easily reach verification goals. While many such aspects are based on common microarchitectural concepts, their specific manifestations are highly design-specific. We propose using an automatic method for acquiring such microarchitectural knowledge and integrating it into the stimuli generator. We start by extracting microarchitectural data from simulation traces. This data is fed to a decision tree learning algorithm that produces rules for microarchitectural behavior of instructions; these rules are then integrated into the testing knowledge of the stimuli generator. This testing knowledge can provide users with the ability to better control the microarchitectural behavior of generated instructions, leading to higher quality test cases. Experimental results on the POWER7 processor showed that our proposed method can improve the microarchitectural coverage of the design.
Yoav Katz, Michal Rimon, Avi Ziv, Gai Shaked
DAC4