Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hui Li 0061

dblp:66/3387-61 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0003-0386-1300ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Reinforcement learning · 54% Deep learning architectures and training · 26% Multi-agent systems · 20%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational finance and economics · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Recommender systems · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
sequence modeling
0.612022
Design Domain Specific Neural Network via Symbolic Testing · KDD 2022
Software testing › test generation
symbolic testing
0.612022
Design Domain Specific Neural Network via Symbolic Testing · KDD 2022
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › regret minimization
counterfactual regret minimization
0.412020
Double Neural Counterfactual Regret Minimization · ICLR 2020
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
game solving
0.412020
Double Neural Counterfactual Regret Minimization · ICLR 2020
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-based reinforcement learning
0.412019
Generative Adversarial User Model for Reinforcement Learning Based Recommendation System · ICML 2019
Computational finance and economics
fraud detection
0.212022
Design Domain Specific Neural Network via Symbolic Testing · KDD 2022
Recommender systems
reinforcement-learning-based recommendation
0.112019
Generative Adversarial User Model for Reinforcement Learning Based Recommendation System · ICML 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

self-attention · 1.7reparameterization trick · 1.7generative adversarial network · 0.8deep q-network · 0.8neural network · 0.4counterfactual regret minimization · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Design Domain Specific Neural Network via Symbolic Testing
abstract
Deep sequence networks such as multi-head self-attention networks provide a promising way to extract effective representations from raw sequence data in an end-to-end fashion and have shown great success in various domains such as natural language processing, computer vision, $etc$. However, in domains such as financial risk management and anti-fraud where expert-derived features are heavily relied on, deep sequence models struggle to dominate the game.In this paper, we introduce a simple framework called symbolic testing to verify the learnability of certain expert-derived features over sequence data. A systematic investigation over simulated data reveals the fact that the self-attention architecture fails to learn some standard symbolic expressions like the count distinct operation. To overcome this deficiency, we propose a novel architecture named SHORING, which contains two components:event network andsequence network. Theevent network efficiently learns arbitrary high-orderevent-level conditional embeddings via a reparameterization trick while thesequence network integrates domain-specific aggregations into the sequence-level representation, thereby providing richer inductive biases compare to standard sequence architectures like self-attention. We conduct comprehensive experiments and ablation studies on synthetic datasets that mimic sequence data commonly seen in anti-fraud domain and three real-world datasets. The results show that SHORING learns commonly used symbolic features well, and experimentally outperforms the state-of-the-art methods by a significant margin over real-world online transaction datasets. The symbolic testing framework and SHORING have been applied in anti-fraud model development at Alipay and improved performance of models for real-time fraud-detection.
Hui Li 0061, Xiaofu Chang, Weiqiang Wang 0002, Yuan Qi 0001
KDD1
2020 Double Neural Counterfactual Regret Minimization
Hui Li 0061, Kailiang Hu, Yuan Qi 0001
ICLR1
2019 Generative Adversarial User Model for Reinforcement Learning Based Recommendation System
abstract
There are great interests as well as many challenges in applying reinforcement learning (RL) to recommendation systems. In this setting, an online user is the environment; neither the reward function nor the environment dynamics are clearly defined, making the application of RL challenging. In this paper, we propose a novel model-based reinforcement learning framework for recommendation systems, where we develop a generative adversarial network to imitate user behavior dynamics and learn her reward function. Using this user model as the simulation environment, we develop a novel Cascading DQN algorithm to obtain a combinatorial recommendation policy which can handle a large number of candidate items efficiently. In our experiments with real data, we show this generative adversarial user model can better explain user behavior than alternatives, and the RL policy based on this model can lead to a better long-term reward for the user and higher click rate for the system.
Xinshi Chen, Shuang Li 0002, Hui Li 0061, Shaohua Jiang, Yuan Qi 0001
ICML3