VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Thomas Naselaris
dblp:66/4417
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0004-4041-3157ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
3D vision · 72% Generative modeling · 16% Learning theory · 6% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › 3D vision › brain decoding
fMRI-to-image reconstruction |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | NSD-Imagery: A Benchmark Dataset for Extending fMRI Vision Decoding Methods to Mental Imagery · CVPR 2025 MindEye2: Shared-Subject Models Enable fMRI-To-Image With 1 Hour of Data · ICML 2024 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
brain decoding |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | NSD-Imagery: A Benchmark Dataset for Extending fMRI Vision Decoding Methods to Mental Imagery · CVPR 2025 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › brain decoding
mental image reconstruction |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | NSD-Imagery: A Benchmark Dataset for Extending fMRI Vision Decoding Methods to Mental Imagery · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | MindEye2: Shared-Subject Models Enable fMRI-To-Image With 1 Hour of Data · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization
model generalization |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | NSD-Imagery: A Benchmark Dataset for Extending fMRI Vision Decoding Methods to Mental Imagery · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › regression
sparse additive model |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Nonparametric sparse hierarchical models describe V1 fMRI responses to natural images · NIPS 2008 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multi-modal feature decoding · 0.9linear decoding · 0.9functional alignment · 0.8fine-tuning · 0.8diffusion model · 0.8sparse additive model · 0.2hierarchical filtering · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | NSD-Imagery: A Benchmark Dataset for Extending fMRI Vision Decoding Methods to Mental ImageryabstractWe release NSD-Imagery, a benchmark dataset of human fMRI activity paired with mental images, to complement the existing Natural Scenes Dataset (NSD), a large-scale dataset of fMRI activity paired with seen images that enabled unprecedented improvements in fMRI-to-image reconstruction efforts. Recent models trained on NSD have been evaluated only on seen image reconstruction. Using NSD-Imagery, it is possible to assess how well these models perform on mental image reconstruction. This is a challenging generalization requirement because mental images are encoded in human brain activity with relatively lower signal-to-noise and spatial resolution; however, generalization from seen to mental imagery is critical for real-world applications in medical domains and brain-computer interfaces, where the desired information is always internally generated. We provide benchmarks for a suite of recent NSD-trained open-source visual decoding models (MindEye1, MindEye2, Brain Diffuser, iCNN, Takagi et al.) on NSD-Imagery, and show that the performance of decoding methods on mental images is largely decoupled from performance on vision reconstruction. We further demonstrate that architectural choices significantly impact cross-decoding performance: models employing simple linear decoding architectures and multi-modal feature decoding generalize better to mental imagery, while complex architectures tend to overfit visual training data. Our findings indicate that mental imagery datasets are critical for the development of practical applications, and establish NSD-Imagery as a useful resource for better aligning visual decoding methods with this goal. Reese Kneeland, Paul S. Scotti, Ghislain St-Yves, Jesse Breedlove, Kendrick N. Kay, Thomas Naselaris |
CVPR | 6 |
| 2025 | Disentangling signal and noise in neural responses through generative modelingabstractMeasurements of neural responses to identically repeated experimental events often exhibit large amounts of variability. This noise is distinct from signal, operationally defined as the average expected response across repeated trials for each given event. Accurately distinguishing signal from noise is important, as each is a target that is worthy of study (many believe noise reflects important aspects of brain function) and it is important not to confuse one for the other. Here, we describe a principled modeling approach in which response measurements are explicitly modeled as the sum of samples from multivariate signal and noise distributions. In our proposed method-termed Generative Modeling of Signal and Noise (GSN)-the signal distribution is estimated by subtracting the estimated noise distribution from the estimated data distribution. Importantly, GSN improves estimates of the signal distribution, but does not provide improved estimates of responses to individual events. We validate GSN using ground-truth simulations and show that it compares favorably with related methods. We also demonstrate the application of GSN to empirical fMRI data to illustrate a simple consequence of GSN: by disentangling signal and noise components in neural responses, GSN denoises principal components analysis and improves estimates of dimensionality. We end by discussing other situations that may benefit from GSN's characterization of signal and noise, such as estimation of noise ceilings for computational models of neural activity. A code toolbox for GSN is provided with both MATLAB and Python implementations. Kendrick N. Kay, Jacob S. Prince, Thomas Gebhart, Greta Tuckute, Thomas Naselaris, Heiko H. Schütt |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 6 |
| 2025 | Variation in the geometry of concept manifolds across human visual cortexabstractBrain activity patterns in high-level visual cortex support accurate linear classification of visual concepts (e.g., objects or scenes). It has long been appreciated that the accuracy of linear classification in any brain area depends on the geometry of its concept manifolds-sets of brain activity patterns that encode images of a concept. However, it is unclear how the geometry of concept manifolds differs between regions of visual cortex that support accurate classification and those that don't, or how it differs between visual cortex and deep neural networks (DNNs). We estimated geometric properties of concept manifolds that, per a recent theory, directly determine the accuracy of simple "few-shot" linear classifiers. Using a large fMRI dataset, we show that variation in classification accuracy across human visual cortex is driven by a variation in a single geometric property: the distance between manifold centers ("geometric Signal"). In contrast, variation in classification accuracy across early and mid DNN layers is driven by an increase in the effective number of manifold dimensions ("Dimensionality"). Despite this difference in the geometric properties that affect few-shot classification performance in the brain and DNNs, we find that Signal and Dimensionality are strongly, negatively correlated: when Signal increases across brain regions or DNN layers, Dimensionality decreases, and vice versa. We conclude that early visual cortical areas and DNN layers deploy different geometric strategies for accurate linear classification of concepts, even though both are subject to the same constraint. Ghislain St-Yves, Kendrick N. Kay, Thomas Naselaris |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 3 |
| 2024 | MindEye2: Shared-Subject Models Enable fMRI-To-Image With 1 Hour of DataabstractReconstructions of visual perception from brain activity have improved tremendously, but the practical utility of such methods has been limited. This is because such models are trained independently per subject where each subject requires dozens of hours of expensive fMRI training data to attain high-quality results. The present work showcases high-quality reconstructions using only 1 hour of fMRI training data. We pretrain our model across 7 subjects and then fine-tune on minimal data from a new subject. Our novel functional alignment procedure linearly maps all brain data to a shared-subject latent space, followed by a shared non-linear mapping to CLIP image space. We then map from CLIP space to pixel space by fine-tuning Stable Diffusion XL to accept CLIP latents as inputs instead of text. This approach improves out-of-subject generalization with limited training data and also attains state-of-the-art image retrieval and reconstruction metrics compared to single-subject approaches. MindEye2 demonstrates how accurate reconstructions of perception are possible from a single visit to the MRI facility. All code is available on Github: https://github.com/MedARC-AI/MindEyeV2 Paul S. Scotti, Mihir Tripathy, Cesar Kadir Torrico Villanueva, Reese Kneeland, Tong Chen 0011, Ashutosh Narang, Charan Santhirasegaran, Jonathan Xu, Thomas Naselaris, Kenneth A. Norman, Tanishq Mathew Abraham |
ICML | 9 |
| 2018 | Generative Adversarial Networks Conditioned on Brain Activity Reconstruct Seen ImagesabstractWe consider the inference problem of reconstructing a visual stimulus from brain activity measurements (e.g. fMRI) that encode this stimulus. Recovering a complete image is complicated by the fact that neural representations are noisy, high-dimensional, and contain incomplete information about image details. Thus, reconstructions of complex images from brain activity require a strong prior. Here we propose to train generative adversarial networks (GANs) to learn a generative model of images that is conditioned on measurements of brain activity. We consider two challenges of this approach: First, given that GANs require far more data to train than is typically collected in an fMRI experiment, how do we obtain enough samples to train a GAN that is conditioned on brain activity? Secondly, how do we ensure that our generated samples are robust against noise present in fMRI data? Our strategy to surmount both of these problems centers around the creation of surrogate brain activity samples that are generated by an encoding model. We find that the generative model thus trained generalizes to real fRMI data measured during perception of images and is able to reconstruct the basic outline of the stimuli. Ghislain St-Yves, Thomas Naselaris |
SMC | 2 |
| 2008 | Nonparametric sparse hierarchical models describe V1 fMRI responses to natural imagesabstractWe propose a novel hierarchical, nonlinear model that predicts brain activity in area V1 evoked by natural images. In the study reported here brain activity was measured by means of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), a noninvasive technique that provides an indirect measure of neural activity pooled over a small volume (~ 2mm cube) of brain tissue. Our model, which we call the SpAM V1 model, is based on the reasonable assumption that fMRI measurements reflect the (possibly nonlinearly) pooled, rectified output of a large population of simple and complex cells in V1. It has a hierarchical filtering stage that consists of three layers: model simple cells, model complex cells, and a third layer in which the complex cells are linearly pooled (called âpooled-complexâ cells). The pooling stage then obtains the measured fMRI signals as a sparse additive model (SpAM) in which a sparse nonparametric (nonlinear) combination of model complex cell and model pooled-complex cell outputs are summed. Our results show that the SpAM V1 model predicts fMRI responses evoked by natural images better than a benchmark model that only provides linear pooling of model complex cells. Furthermore, the spatial receptive fields, frequency tuning and orientation tuning curves of the SpAM V1 model estimated for each voxel appears to be consistent with the known properties of V1, and with previous analyses of this data set. A visualization procedure applied to the SpAM V1 model shows that most of the nonlinear pooling consists of simple compressive or saturating nonlinearities. Pradeep Ravikumar, Vincent Q. Vu, Bin Yu 0001, Thomas Naselaris, Kendrick N. Kay, Jack L. Gallant |
NIPS | 4 |