Florian Steinke

dblp:66/4662 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
12ranked-venue papers
6as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0003-3012-9991ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 3 first-authorComputer networks · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
6 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 52% Generative modeling · 17% Representation and self-supervised learning · 13%
Computer graphics and multimedia
3 papers
Geometric modeling and processing · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%

Topics — the 20 heaviest of 21, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
copula models
0.512021
Implicit Generative Copulas · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › structure learning
dependency structure learning
0.512021
Implicit Generative Copulas · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Generative modeling
implicit generative model
0.512021
Implicit Generative Copulas · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › density estimation
multivariate density estimation
0.512021
Implicit Generative Copulas · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
dimensionality reduction
0.112009
Semi-supervised Regression using Hessian energy with an application to semi-supervised dimensionality reduction · NIPS 2009
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › similarity measure
learned similarity measure
0.112009
Learning similarity measure for multi-modal 3D image registration · CVPR 2009
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
metric learning
0.112009
Learning similarity measure for multi-modal 3D image registration · CVPR 2009
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
semi-supervised dimensionality reduction
0.112009
Semi-supervised Regression using Hessian energy with an application to semi-supervised dimensionality reduction · NIPS 2009
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
semi-supervised learning
0.112009
Semi-supervised Regression using Hessian energy with an application to semi-supervised dimensionality reduction · NIPS 2009
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › semi-supervised learning
semi-supervised regression
0.112009
Semi-supervised Regression using Hessian energy with an application to semi-supervised dimensionality reduction · NIPS 2009
Medical and health informatics › medical imaging
medical image analysis
0.112009
Learning similarity measure for multi-modal 3D image registration · CVPR 2009
Medical and health informatics › medical imaging › medical image analysis
multi-modal image registration
0.112009
Learning similarity measure for multi-modal 3D image registration · CVPR 2009
Machine learning › Learning theory › nonparametric regression
manifold regression
0.112008
Non-parametric Regression Between Manifolds · NIPS 2008
Machine learning › Learning theory
nonparametric regression
0.112008
Non-parametric Regression Between Manifolds · NIPS 2008
Geometric modeling and processing › shape registration
surface registration
0.112008
Non-parametric Regression Between Manifolds · NIPS 2008
Computer vision › 3D vision › correspondence estimation
dense correspondence
0.112006
Learning Dense 3D Correspondence · NIPS 2006
Geometric modeling and processing
shape correspondence
0.112006
Learning Dense 3D Correspondence · NIPS 2006
Computer vision › 3D vision › motion estimation › non-rigid motion estimation
deformation field estimation
0.112005
Object correspondence as a machine learning problem · ICML 2005
Computer vision › 3D vision › correspondence estimation
object correspondence
0.112005
Object correspondence as a machine learning problem · ICML 2005
Geometric modeling and processing
shape matching
0.112005
Object correspondence as a machine learning problem · ICML 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

probability integral transform · 0.5neural network · 0.5principal component analysis · 0.2max-margin structured output learning · 0.2riemannian geometry · 0.2regularized empirical risk minimization · 0.2feature learning · 0.1manifold regularization · 0.1hessian energy · 0.1graph laplacian regularization · 0.1metric learning · 0.1support vector machine · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Adaptive global coordination of local routing policies for communication networks
Allan Almeida Santos, Amr Rizk, Florian Steinke
Comput. Commun.3
2021 Implicit Generative Copulas
abstract
Copulas are a powerful tool for modeling multivariate distributions as they allow to separately estimate the univariate marginal distributions and the joint dependency structure. However, known parametric copulas offer limited flexibility especially in high dimensions, while commonly used non-parametric methods suffer from the curse of dimensionality. A popular remedy is to construct a tree-based hierarchy of conditional bivariate copulas.In this paper, we propose a flexible, yet conceptually simple alternative based on implicit generative neural networks.The key challenge is to ensure marginal uniformity of the estimated copula distribution.We achieve this by learning a multivariate latent distribution with unspecified marginals but the desired dependency structure.By applying the probability integral transform, we can then obtain samples from the high-dimensional copula distribution without relying on parametric assumptions or the need to find a suitable tree structure.Experiments on synthetic and real data from finance, physics, and image generation demonstrate the performance of this approach.
Tim Janke, Mohamed Ghanmi, Florian Steinke
NeurIPS3
2010 A new approach to clustering using eigen decomposition
abstract
We propose a novel approach to relational clustering: Given a matrix of pairwise similarity values between objects our algorithm computes a partition of the objects such that similar objects belong to the same cluster and dissimilar objects belong to different clusters. The proposed approach is based on the assumption that the given similarities are products of cluster membership variables. It is based on eigen vector decomposition and minimizes the squared error between the similarities and the products of membership vectors in an efficient, non-iterative way with guaranteed global optimality. In experiments with real world data we show superior performance to conventional iterative clustering approaches.
Thomas A. Runkler, Florian Steinke
FUZZ-IEEE2
2010 Nonparametric Regression between General Riemannian Manifolds
abstract
We study nonparametric regression between Riemannian manifolds based on regularized empirical risk minimization. Regularization functionals for mappings between manifolds should respect the geometry of input and output manifold and be independent of the chosen parametrization of the manifolds. We define and analyze the three most simple regularization functionals with these properties and present a rather general scheme for solving the resulting optimization problem. As application examples we discuss interpolation on the sphere, fingerprint processing, and correspondence computations between three-dimensional surfaces. We conclude with characterizing interesting and sometimes counterintuitive implications and new open problems that are specific to learning between Riemannian manifolds and are not encountered in multivariate regression in Euclidean space.
Florian Steinke, Matthias Hein 0001, Bernhard Schölkopf
SIAM J. Imaging Sci.1
2009 Learning similarity measure for multi-modal 3D image registration
abstract
Multi-modal image registration is a challenging problem in medical imaging. The goal is to align anatomically identical structures; however, their appearance in images acquired with different imaging devices, such as CT or MR, may be very different. Registration algorithms generally deform one image, the floating image, such that it matches with a second, the reference image, by maximizing some similarity score between the deformed and the reference image. Instead of using a universal, but a priori fixed similarity criterion such as mutual information, we propose learning a similarity measure in a discriminative manner such that the reference and correctly deformed floating images receive high similarity scores. To this end, we develop an algorithm derived from max-margin structured output learning, and employ the learned similarity measure within a standard rigid registration algorithm. Compared to other approaches, our method adapts to the specific registration problem at hand and exploits correlations between neighboring pixels in the reference and the floating image. Empirical evaluation on CT-MR/PET-MR rigid registration tasks demonstrates that our approach yields robust performance and outperforms the state of the art methods for multi-modal medical image registration.
Dae-Won Lee, Matthias Hofmann, Florian Steinke, Yasemin Altun, Nathan D. Cahill, Bernhard Schölkopf
CVPR3
2009 Semi-supervised Regression using Hessian energy with an application to semi-supervised dimensionality reduction
abstract
Semi-supervised regression based on the graph Laplacian suffers from the fact that the solution is biased towards a constant and the lack of extrapolating power. Outgoing from these observations we propose to use the second-order Hessian energy for semi-supervised regression which overcomes both of these problems, in particular, if the data lies on or close to a low-dimensional submanifold in the feature space, the Hessian energy prefers functions which vary ``linearly with respect to the natural parameters in the data. This property makes it also particularly suited for the task of semi-supervised dimensionality reduction where the goal is to find the natural parameters in the data based on a few labeled points. The experimental result suggest that our method is superior to semi-supervised regression using Laplacian regularization and standard supervised methods and is particularly suited for semi-supervised dimensionality reduction.
Kwang In Kim, Florian Steinke, Matthias Hein 0001
NIPS2
2008 Non-parametric Regression Between Manifolds
abstract
This paper discusses non-parametric regression between Riemannian manifolds. This learning problem arises frequently in many application areas ranging from signal processing, computer vision, over robotics to computer graphics. We present a new algorithmic scheme for the solution of this general learning problem based on regularized empirical risk minimization. The regularization functional takes into account the geometry of input and output manifold, and we show that it implements a prior which is particularly natural. Moreover, we demonstrate that our algorithm performs well in a difficult surface registration problem.
Florian Steinke, Matthias Hein 0001
NIPS1
2008 Manifold-valued Thin-Plate Splines with Applications in Computer Graphics
abstract
Abstract We present a generalization of thin‐plate splines for interpolation and approximation of manifold‐valued data, and demonstrate its usefulness in computer graphics with several applications from different fields. The cornerstone of our theoretical framework is an energy functional for mappings between two Riemannian manifolds which is independent of parametrization and respects the geometry of both manifolds. If the manifolds are Euclidean, the energy functional reduces to the classical thin‐plate spline energy. We show how the resulting optimization problems can be solved efficiently in many cases. Our example applications range from orientation interpolation and motion planning in animation over geometric modelling tasks to color interpolation.
Florian Steinke, Matthias Hein 0001, Jan Peters 0001, Bernhard Schölkopf
Comput. Graph. Forum1
2008 Kernels, regularization and differential equations
Florian Steinke, Bernhard Schölkopf
Pattern Recognit.1
2006 Learning Dense 3D Correspondence
abstract
Establishing correspondence between distinct objects is an important and nontrivial task: correctness of the correspondence hinges on properties which are difficult to capture in an a priori criterion. While previous work has used a priori criteria which in some cases led to very good results, the present paper explores whether it is possible to learn a combination of features that, for a given training set of aligned human heads, characterizes the notion of correct correspondence. By optimizing this criterion, we are then able to compute correspondence and morphs for novel heads.
Florian Steinke, Bernhard Schölkopf, Volker Blanz
NIPS1
2005 Object correspondence as a machine learning problem
abstract
We propose machine learning methods for the estimation of deformation fields that transform two given objects into each other, thereby establishing a dense point to point correspondence. The fields are computed using a modified support vector machine containing a penalty enforcing that points of one object will be mapped to "similar" points on the other one. Our system, which contains little engineering or domain knowledge, delivers state of the art performance. We present application results including close to photorealistic morphs of 3D head models.
Bernhard Schölkopf, Florian Steinke, Volker Blanz
ICML2
2005 Support Vector Machines for 3D Shape Processing
abstract
We propose statistical learning methods for approximating implicit surfaces and computing dense 3D deformation\nfields. Our approach is based on Support Vector (SV) Machines, which are state of the art in machine learning. It\nis straightforward to implement and computationally competitive; its parameters can be automatically set using\nstandard machine learning methods.\nThe surface approximation is based on a modified Support Vector regression. We present applications to 3D head\nreconstruction, including automatic removal of outliers and hole filling.\nIn a second step, we build on our SV representation to compute dense 3D deformation fields between two objects.\nThe fields are computed using a generalized SVMachine enforcing correspondence between the previously learned\nimplicit SV object representations, as well as correspondences between feature points if such points are available.\nWe apply the method to the morphing of 3D heads and other objects.
Florian Steinke, Bernhard Schölkopf, Volker Blanz
Comput. Graph. Forum1