Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Preyas Popat
dblp:66/7606
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 6 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
4 papers |
Computational complexity · 55% Coding theory · 19% Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 17% | |
| Network and information security
2 papers |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational complexity
hardness of approximation |
0.6 | 4 | 2014 | Almost Polynomial Factor Hardness for Closest Vector Problem with Preprocessing · SIAM J. Comput. 2014 2log1-ε n hardness for the closest vector problem with preprocessing · STOC 2012 On the hardness of pricing loss-leaders · SODA 2012 |
Computational complexity › lattice problems
closest vector problem |
0.3 | 2 | 2014 | Almost Polynomial Factor Hardness for Closest Vector Problem with Preprocessing · SIAM J. Comput. 2014 2log1-ε n hardness for the closest vector problem with preprocessing · STOC 2012 |
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › decoding
nearest codeword problem |
0.3 | 2 | 2014 | Almost Polynomial Factor Hardness for Closest Vector Problem with Preprocessing · SIAM J. Comput. 2014 2log1-ε n hardness for the closest vector problem with preprocessing · STOC 2012 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › pricing
item pricing |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | On the hardness of pricing loss-leaders · SODA 2012 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
pricing |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | On the hardness of pricing loss-leaders · SODA 2012 |
Mathematical optimization › semidefinite programming
semidefinite programming gaps |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | SDP Gaps for 2-to-1 and Other Label-Cover Variants · ICALP (1) 2010 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › post-quantum cryptography
lattice-based cryptography |
0.1 | 2 | 2014 | Almost Polynomial Factor Hardness for Closest Vector Problem with Preprocessing · SIAM J. Comput. 2014 2log1-ε n hardness for the closest vector problem with preprocessing · STOC 2012 |
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation algorithms |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | On the hardness of pricing loss-leaders · SODA 2012 |
Computational complexity › hardness of approximation
label cover |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | SDP Gaps for 2-to-1 and Other Label-Cover Variants · ICALP (1) 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reduction · 0.7preprocessing · 0.4unique games conjecture · 0.1NP-hardness reduction · 0.1semidefinite programming · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | Fractal Structures in Adversarial PredictionabstractFractals are self-similar recursive structures that have been used in modeling several real world processes. In this work we study how "fractal-like" processes arise in a prediction game where an adversary is generating a sequence of bits and an algorithm is trying to predict them. We will see that under a certain formalization of the predictive payoff for the algorithm it is most optimal for the adversary to produce a fractal-like sequence to minimize the algorithm's ability to predict. Indeed it has been suggested before that financial markets exhibit a fractal-like behavior [FP98, Man05]. We prove that a fractal-like distribution arises naturally out of an optimization from the adversary's perspective. Rina Panigrahy, Preyas Popat |
ITCS | 2 |
| 2014 | Optimal amortized regret in every interval
Rina Panigrahy, Preyas Popat |
UAI | 2 |
| 2014 | Almost Polynomial Factor Hardness for Closest Vector Problem with PreprocessingabstractWe prove that for an arbitrarily small constant $\varepsilon>0,$ the preprocessing versions of the closest vector problem and the nearest codeword problem are hard to approximate within a factor $2^{\log ^{1-\varepsilon}n}$, under the assumption that NP $\not \subseteq$ SIZE$(2^{\log^{O(1/\varepsilon)} n})$. Subhash Khot, Preyas Popat, Nisheeth K. Vishnoi |
SIAM J. Comput. | 2 |
| 2012 | On the hardness of pricing loss-leadersabstractConsider the problem of pricing n items under an unlimited supply with m buyers.Each buyer is interested in a bundle of at most k of the items.These buyers are single minded, which means each of them has a budget and they will either buy all the items if the total price is within their budget or they will buy none of the items.The goal is to price each item with profit margin p1, p2, ..., pn so as to maximize the overall profit.When k = 2, such a problem is called the graph-vertex-pricing problem.Another special case of the problem is the highway-pricing problem when the items (toll-booths) are arranged linearly on a line and each buyer (as a driver) is interested in paying for a path that consists of consecutive items.The goal again is to price the items (tolls) so as to maximize the total profits.There is an O(k)-approximation algorithm by [BB06] when the price on each item must be above its margin cost; i.e., pi > 0 for every i ∈ [n].As for the highway problem, a PTAS is shown in [GR11].We investigate the above problem when the seller is allowed to price some of the items below their margin cost.It is shown in [BB06, BBCH07] that by pricing some of the items below cost, the maximum profit can increase by a factor of Ω(log n).These items sold at low prices to stimulate other profitable sales are called "loss leaders".Given the possibility of making more profit, understanding the approximability of pricing loss leaders for graph-vertex-pricing, highway-pricing as well as the general item pricing problem are formulated as open problems in [BB06,BBCH07].In this paper, we obtain strong hardness of approximation result for the problem of pricing loss leaders.First we show that it is NP-hard to get better than O(log log log n)approximation when k ≥ 3.This improves a previous super-constant hardness result assuming the Unique Games Conjecture [Wu11].In addition, we show a super-constant Unique-Games hardness for the highway-pricing problem as well as the graph-vertex-pricing problem. Preyas Popat, Yi Wu 0002 |
SODA | 1 |
| 2012 | 2log1-ε n hardness for the closest vector problem with preprocessingabstractWe prove that for an arbitrarily small constant ε>0, assuming NP⊈ DTIME (2logO 1-ε n), the preprocessing versions of the closest vector problem and the nearest codeword problem are hard to approximate within a factor better than 2log1-ε n. This improves upon the previous hardness factor of (log n)δ for some δ>0 due to [AKKV05]. Subhash Khot, Preyas Popat, Nisheeth K. Vishnoi |
STOC | 2 |
| 2010 | Approximate Lasserre Integrality Gap for Unique Games
Subhash Khot, Preyas Popat, Rishi Saket |
APPROX-RANDOM | 2 |
| 2010 | SDP Gaps for 2-to-1 and Other Label-Cover Variants
Venkatesan Guruswami, Subhash Khot, Ryan O'Donnell, Preyas Popat, Madhur Tulsiani, Yi Wu 0002 |
ICALP (1) | 4 |
| 2009 | NP-hardness of Euclidean sum-of-squares clustering
Daniel Aloise, Amit Deshpande 0001, Pierre Hansen, Preyas Popat |
Mach. Learn. | 4 |