Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yves Lafon

dblp:66/8024 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Internet architecture and protocols · 100%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Multimedia systems and quality of experience · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Internet architecture and protocols › world wide web
web standards
0.112010
Implementing the media fragments URI specification · WWW 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

client-side and server-side media fragment handling · 0.2URI resolution · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 A URI-based approach for addressing fragments of media resources on the Web
Erik Mannens, Davy Van Deursen, Raphaël Troncy, Silvia Pfeiffer, Conrad Parker, Yves Lafon, Jack Jansen 0001, Michael Hausenblas, Rik Van de Walle
Multim. Tools Appl.6
2010 Implementing the media fragments URI specification
abstract
In this paper, we describe two examples of implementations of the Media Fragments URI specification which is currently being developed by the W3C Media Fragments Working Group. The group's mission is to create standard addressing schemes for media fragments on the Web using Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs). We describe two scenarios to illustrate the implementations. More specifically, we show how User Agents (UA) will either be able to resolve media fragment URIs without help from the server, or will make use of a media fragments-aware server. Finally, we present some ongoing discussions and issues regarding the implementation of the Media Fragments specification.
Davy Van Deursen, Raphaël Troncy, Erik Mannens, Silvia Pfeiffer, Yves Lafon, Rik Van de Walle
WWW5