Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hanie Sedghi

dblp:66/8332 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
18ranked-venue papers
4as first author
8since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-7163-5009ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 17 · 4 first-author · 8 since 2021Computer networks · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
12 papers
Deep learning architectures and training · 27% Trustworthy machine learning · 26% Language models and text generation · 19%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Mathematical optimization · 65% Algorithms and data structures · 35%

Topics — the 28 heaviest of 31, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › privacy
training data memorization
1.322023
Can Neural Network Memorization Be Localized? · ICML 2023
Leveraging Unlabeled Data to Track Memorization · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › symmetry-aware learning
permutation invariance
1.222023
REPAIR: REnormalizing Permuted Activations for Interpolation Repair · ICLR 2023
The Role of Permutation Invariance in Linear Mode Connectivity of Neural Networks · ICLR 2022
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › in-context learning
demonstration selection
0.912025
Improving Large Language Model Planning with Action Sequence Similarity · ICLR 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
in-context learning
0.912025
Improving Large Language Model Planning with Action Sequence Similarity · ICLR 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › LLM agents
large language model planning
0.912025
Improving Large Language Model Planning with Action Sequence Similarity · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
convolutional neural network
0.822020
Generalization bounds for deep convolutional neural networks · ICLR 2020
The Singular Values of Convolutional Layers · ICLR (Poster) 2019
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.712023
Can Neural Network Memorization Be Localized? · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › model adaptation
model interpolation
0.712023
REPAIR: REnormalizing Permuted Activations for Interpolation Repair · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
semi-supervised learning
0.712023
Leveraging Unlabeled Data to Track Memorization · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
distribution shift
0.612022
Leveraging unlabeled data to predict out-of-distribution performance · ICLR 2022
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model training
large-scale pretraining
0.612022
Exploring the Limits of Large Scale Pre-training · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › loss landscape › mode connectivity
linear mode connectivity
0.612022
The Role of Permutation Invariance in Linear Mode Connectivity of Neural Networks · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
loss landscape
0.612022
The Role of Permutation Invariance in Linear Mode Connectivity of Neural Networks · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
out-of-distribution generalization
0.612022
Leveraging unlabeled data to predict out-of-distribution performance · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › accuracy estimation
out-of-distribution performance prediction
0.612022
Leveraging unlabeled data to predict out-of-distribution performance · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
pre-training
0.612022
Exploring the Limits of Large Scale Pre-training · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.612022
Leveraging unlabeled data to predict out-of-distribution performance · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
scaling laws
0.612022
Exploring the Limits of Large Scale Pre-training · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization
0.512021
The Deep Bootstrap Framework: Good Online Learners are Good Offline Generalizers · ICLR 2021
Machine learning › Learning theory
online learning
0.512021
The Deep Bootstrap Framework: Good Online Learners are Good Offline Generalizers · ICLR 2021
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
feature reuse
0.412020
What is being transferred in transfer learning? · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds
0.412020
Generalization bounds for deep convolutional neural networks · ICLR 2020
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization
generalization in deep learning
0.412020
The intriguing role of module criticality in the generalization of deep networks · ICLR 2020
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › regularization
dropout
0.212023
Can Neural Network Memorization Be Localized? · ICML 2023
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › proximal methods
alternating direction method of multipliers
0.212014
Multi-Step Stochastic ADMM in High Dimensions: Applications to Sparse Optimization and Matrix Decomposition · NIPS 2014
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra
matrix factorization
0.212014
Multi-Step Stochastic ADMM in High Dimensions: Applications to Sparse Optimization and Matrix Decomposition · NIPS 2014
Mathematical optimization
sparse optimization
0.212014
Multi-Step Stochastic ADMM in High Dimensions: Applications to Sparse Optimization and Matrix Decomposition · NIPS 2014
Mathematical optimization
stochastic optimization
0.212014
Multi-Step Stochastic ADMM in High Dimensions: Applications to Sparse Optimization and Matrix Decomposition · NIPS 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

unlabeled data · 1.2in-context learning · 0.9dynamic clustering · 0.9action sequence similarity · 0.9retraining · 0.7permutation alignment · 0.7memorization tracking · 0.7layer rewinding · 0.7gradient accounting · 0.7activation renormalization · 0.7stochastic ADMM · 0.2high-dimensional optimization · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Improving Large Language Model Planning with Action Sequence Similarity
abstract
Planning is essential for artificial intelligence systems to look ahead and proactively determine a course of actions to reach objectives in the virtual and real world. Recent work on large language models (LLMs) sheds light on their planning capability in various tasks. However, it remains unclear what signals in the context influence the model performance. In this work, we explore how to improve the model planning capability through in-context learning (ICL), specifically, what signals can help select the exemplars. Through extensive experiments, we observe that commonly used problem similarity may result in false positives with drastically different plans, which can mislead the model. In response, we propose to sample and filter exemplars leveraging plan side action sequence similarity (AS). We propose GRASE-DC: a two-stage pipeline that first re-samples high AS exemplars and then curates the selected exemplars with dynamic clustering on AS to achieve a balance of relevance and diversity. Our experimental result confirms that GRASE-DC achieves significant performance improvement on various planning tasks (up to ~11-40 point absolute accuracy improvement with 27.3% fewer exemplars needed on average). With GRASE-DC* + VAL, where we iteratively apply GRASE-DC with a validator, we are able to even boost the performance by 18.9% more. Extensive analysis validates the consistent performance improvement of GRASE-DC with various backbone LLMs and on both classical planning and natural language planning benchmarks. GRASE-DC can further boost the planning accuracy by ~24 absolute points on harder problems using simpler problems as exemplars over a random baseline. This demonstrates its ability to generalize to out-of-distribution problems.
Hanie Sedghi, Bernd Bohnet, Dale Schuurmans, Azade Nova
ICLR2
2023 Leveraging Unlabeled Data to Track Memorization
Mahsa Forouzesh, Hanie Sedghi, Patrick Thiran
ICLR2
2023 REPAIR: REnormalizing Permuted Activations for Interpolation Repair
Keller Jordan, Hanie Sedghi, Olga Saukh, Rahim Entezari, Behnam Neyshabur
ICLR2
2023 Can Neural Network Memorization Be Localized?
abstract
Recent efforts at explaining the interplay of memorization and generalization in deep overparametrized networks have posited that neural networks *memorize* ``hard'' examples in the final few layers of the model. Memorization refers to the ability to correctly predict on *atypical* examples of the training set. In this work, we show that rather than being confined to individual layers, memorization is a phenomenon confined to a small set of neurons in various layers of the model. First, via three experimental sources of converging evidence, we find that most layers are redundant for the memorization of examples and the layers that contribute to example memorization are, in general, not the final layers. The three sources are *gradient accounting* (measuring the contribution to the gradient norms from memorized and clean examples), *layer rewinding* (replacing specific model weights of a converged model with previous training checkpoints), and *retraining* (training rewound layers only on clean examples). Second, we ask a more generic question: can memorization be localized *anywhere* in a model? We discover that memorization is often confined to a small number of neurons or channels (around 5) of the model. Based on these insights we propose a new form of dropout---*example-tied dropout* that enables us to direct the memorization of examples to an aprior determined set of neurons. By dropping out these neurons, we are able to reduce the accuracy on memorized examples from 100% to 3%, while also reducing the generalization gap.
Pratyush Maini, Michael C. Mozer, Hanie Sedghi, Zachary C. Lipton, J. Zico Kolter, Chiyuan Zhang
ICML3
2022 Exploring the Limits of Large Scale Pre-training
Samira Abnar, Mostafa Dehghani 0001, Behnam Neyshabur, Hanie Sedghi
ICLR4
2022 The Role of Permutation Invariance in Linear Mode Connectivity of Neural Networks
Rahim Entezari, Hanie Sedghi, Olga Saukh, Behnam Neyshabur
ICLR2
2022 Leveraging unlabeled data to predict out-of-distribution performance
Sivaraman Balakrishnan, Zachary C. Lipton, Behnam Neyshabur, Hanie Sedghi
ICLR5
2021 The Deep Bootstrap Framework: Good Online Learners are Good Offline Generalizers
Preetum Nakkiran, Behnam Neyshabur, Hanie Sedghi
ICLR3
2020 The intriguing role of module criticality in the generalization of deep networks
Niladri S. Chatterji, Behnam Neyshabur, Hanie Sedghi
ICLR3
2020 Generalization bounds for deep convolutional neural networks
Philip M. Long, Hanie Sedghi
ICLR2
2020 What is being transferred in transfer learning?
abstract
One desired capability for machines is the ability to transfer their understanding of one domain to another domain where data is (usually) scarce. Despite ample adaptation of transfer learning in many deep learning applications, we yet do not understand what enables a successful transfer and which part of the network is responsible for that. In this paper, we provide new tools and analysis to address these fundamental questions. Through a series of analysis on transferring to block-shuffled images, we separate the effect of feature reuse from learning high-level statistics of data and show that some benefit of transfer learning comes from the latter. We present that when training from pre-trained weights, the model stays in the same basin in the loss landscape and different instances of such model are similar in feature space and close in parameter space.
Behnam Neyshabur, Hanie Sedghi, Chiyuan Zhang
NeurIPS2
2019 The Singular Values of Convolutional Layers
Hanie Sedghi, Vineet Gupta 0001, Philip M. Long
ICLR (Poster)1
2019 On the Effect of the Activation Function on the Distribution of Hidden Nodes in a Deep Network
abstract
We analyze the joint probability distribution on the lengths of the vectors of hidden variables in different layers of a fully connected deep network, when the weights and biases are chosen randomly according to gaussian distributions. We show that if the activation function [Formula: see text] satisfies a minimal set of assumptions, satisfied by all activation functions that we know that are used in practice, then, as the width of the network gets large, the “length process” converges in probability to a length map that is determined as a simple function of the variances of the random weights and biases and the activation function [Formula: see text]. We also show that this convergence may fail for [Formula: see text] that violate our assumptions. We show how to use this analysis to choose the variance of weight initialization, depending on the activation function, so that hidden variables maintain a consistent scale throughout the network.
Philip M. Long, Hanie Sedghi
Neural Comput.2
2018 Knowledge Completion for Generics Using Guided Tensor Factorization
abstract
Given a knowledge base or KB containing (noisy) facts about common nouns or generics, such as “all trees produce oxygen” or “some animals live in forests”, we consider the problem of inferring additional such facts at a precision similar to that of the starting KB. Such KBs capture general knowledge about the world, and are crucial for various applications such as question answering. Different from commonly studied named entity KBs such as Freebase, generics KBs involve quantification, have more complex underlying regularities, tend to be more incomplete, and violate the commonly used locally closed world assumption (LCWA). We show that existing KB completion methods struggle with this new task, and present the first approach that is successful. Our results demonstrate that external information, such as relation schemas and entity taxonomies, if used appropriately, can be a surprisingly powerful tool in this setting. First, our simple yet effective knowledge guided tensor factorization approach achieves state-of-the-art results on two generics KBs (80% precise) for science, doubling their size at 74%–86% precision. Second, our novel taxonomy guided, submodular, active learning method for collecting annotations about rare entities (e.g., oriole, a bird) is 6x more effective at inferring further new facts about them than multiple active learning baselines.
Hanie Sedghi, Ashish Sabharwal
Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics1
2017 How Good Are My Predictions? Efficiently Approximating Precision-Recall Curves for Massive Datasets
Ashish Sabharwal, Hanie Sedghi
UAI2
2016 Provable Tensor Methods for Learning Mixtures of Generalized Linear Models
abstract
We consider the problem of learning mixtures of generalized linear models (GLM) which arise in classification and regression problems. Typical learning approaches such as expectation maximization (EM) or variational Bayes can get stuck in spurious local optima. In contrast, we present a tensor decomposition method which is guaranteed to correctly recover the parameters. The key insight is to employ certain feature transformations of the input, which depend on the input generative model. Specifically, we employ score function tensors of the input and compute their cross-correlation with the response variable. We establish that the decomposition of this tensor consistently recovers the parameters, under mild non-degeneracy conditions. We demonstrate that the computational and sample complexity of our method is a low order polynomial of the input and the latent dimensions.
Hanie Sedghi, Majid Janzamin, Anima Anandkumar
AISTATS1
2014 Multi-Step Stochastic ADMM in High Dimensions: Applications to Sparse Optimization and Matrix Decomposition
Hanie Sedghi, Anima Anandkumar, Edmond A. Jonckheere
NIPS1
2010 A Game-Theoretic Approach for Power Allocation in Bidirectional Cooperative Communication
abstract
Cooperative communication exploits wireless broadcast advantage to confront the severe fading effect on wireless communications. Proper allocation of power can play an important role in the performance of cooperative communication. In this paper, we propose a distributed game-theoretical method for power allocation in bidirectional cooperative communication networks. In this work, we consider two nodes as data sources who want to cooperate in sending data to the destination. In addition to being data source, each source node has to relay the other's data. We answer the question: How much power each node contributes for relaying other node's data? We use Stackelberg game which is an extensive-form game to find a solution to this problem. The proposed method reaches equilibrium in only one stage. It is shown that there are more benefits when bidirectional cooperation is done between node pairs who are closer to each other. Simulation results show that the proposed method leads to fair solution and the nodes farther to the destination should contribute more power to cooperate with others.
Majid Janzamin, Mohammad Reza Pakravan, Hanie Sedghi
WCNC3