Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Aditya Gupta 0001

dblp:66/841-1 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
1as first author
6since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-4511-7814ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 1 first-author · 6 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 33% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 16% Language models and text generation · 16%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
model routing
0.812024
AutoMix: Automatically Mixing Language Models · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › verification
self-verification
0.812024
AutoMix: Automatically Mixing Language Models · NeurIPS 2024
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing
multilingual parsing
0.712023
PRESTO: A Multilingual Dataset for Parsing Realistic Task-Oriented Dialogs · EMNLP 2023
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
task-oriented dialogue
0.712023
PRESTO: A Multilingual Dataset for Parsing Realistic Task-Oriented Dialogs · EMNLP 2023
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › temporal reasoning
temporal commonsense reasoning
0.512021
TIMEDIAL: Temporal Commonsense Reasoning in Dialog · ACL/IJCNLP (1) 2021
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
entity tracking
0.412019
Effective Use of Transformer Networks for Entity Tracking · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer
0.322022
TableFormer: Robust Transformer Modeling for Table-Text Encoding · ACL (1) 2022
Effective Use of Transformer Networks for Entity Tracking · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
commonsense reasoning
0.112021
TIMEDIAL: Temporal Commonsense Reasoning in Dialog · ACL/IJCNLP (1) 2021
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
temporal reasoning
0.112021
TIMEDIAL: Temporal Commonsense Reasoning in Dialog · ACL/IJCNLP (1) 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

few-shot self-verification · 0.8POMDP · 0.8transformer · 0.6table-text encoding · 0.6attention bias · 0.6benchmark construction · 0.5transformer network · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 AutoMix: Automatically Mixing Language Models
abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are now available from cloud API providers in various sizes and configurations. While this diversity offers a broad spectrum of choices, effectively leveraging the options to optimize computational cost and performance remains challenging. In this work, we present AutoMix, an approach that strategically routes queries to larger LMs, based on the approximate correctness of outputs from a smaller LM. Central to AutoMix are two key technical contributions. First, it has a few-shot self-verification mechanism, which estimates the reliability of its own outputs without requiring extensive training. Second, given that self-verification can be noisy, it employs a POMDP based router that can effectively select an appropriately sized model, based on answer confidence. Experiments across five language models and five challenging datasets show that Automix consistently surpasses strong baselines, reducing computational cost by over 50\% for comparable performance.
Pranjal Aggarwal, Aman Madaan, Ankit Anand, Srividya Pranavi Potharaju, Swaroop Mishra, Aditya Gupta 0001, Dheeraj Rajagopal, Karthik Kappaganthu, Yiming Yang 0002, Shyam Upadhyay, Manaal Faruqui, Mausam
NeurIPS7
2023 Efficient Encoders for Streaming Sequence Tagging
abstract
A naive application of state-of-the-art bidirectional encoders for streaming sequence tagging would require re-encoding all tokens from scratch whenever a new token appears in an incremental streaming input (like transcribed speech).The lack of re-usability of previous computation leads to a higher number of Floating Point Operations (or FLOPs) and higher number of unnecessary label flips.Increased FLOPs consequently lead to higher wall-clock time and increased label flipping leads to poorer streaming performance.In this work, we present Hybrid Encoder with Adaptive Restart (HEAR) that addresses these issues while maintaining the performance of bidirectional encoders over offline (or complete) inputs and improving performance on streaming (or incomplete) inputs.HEAR uses a HYBRID unidirectional-bidirectional encoder architecture to perform sequence tagging, along with an Adaptive Restart Module (ARM) to selectively guide the restart of bidirectional portion of the encoder.Across four sequence tagging tasks, HEAR offers FLOPs savings in streaming settings upto 71.1% and also outperforms bidirectional encoders for streaming predictions by upto +10% streaming exact match.
Ayush Kaushal, Aditya Gupta 0001, Shyam Upadhyay, Manaal Faruqui
EACL2
2023 PRESTO: A Multilingual Dataset for Parsing Realistic Task-Oriented Dialogs
abstract
Rahul Goel, Waleed Ammar, Aditya Gupta, Siddharth Vashishtha, Motoki Sano, Faiz Surani, Max Chang, HyunJeong Choe, David Greene, Chuan He, Rattima Nitisaroj, Anna Trukhina, Shachi Paul, Pararth Shah, Rushin Shah, Zhou Yu. Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2023.
Rahul Goel, Waleed Ammar, Aditya Gupta 0001, Siddharth Vashishtha, Motoki Sano, Faiz Surani, Max Chang, HyunJeong Choe, David Greene, Rattima Nitisaroj, Anna Trukhina, Shachi Paul, Pararth Shah, Rushin Shah
EMNLP3
2022 TableFormer: Robust Transformer Modeling for Table-Text Encoding
abstract
Understanding tables is an important aspect of natural language understanding.Existing models for table understanding require linearization of the table structure, where row or column order is encoded as an unwanted bias.Such spurious biases make the model vulnerable to row and column order perturbations.Additionally, prior work has not thoroughly modeled the table structures or table-text alignments, hindering the table-text understanding ability.In this work, we propose a robust and structurally aware table-text encoding architecture TABLEFORMER, where tabular structural biases are incorporated completely through learnable attention biases.TABLEFORMER is (1) strictly invariant to row and column orders, and, (2) could understand tables better due to its tabular inductive biases.Our evaluations showed that TABLEFORMER outperforms strong baselines in all settings on SQA, WTQ and TABFACT table reasoning datasets, and achieves state-of-the-art performance on SQA, especially when facing answer-invariant row and column order perturbations (6% improvement over the best baseline), because previous SOTA models' performance drops by 4% -6% when facing such perturbations while TABLEFORMER is not affected.1
Jingfeng Yang 0001, Aditya Gupta 0001, Shyam Upadhyay, Luheng He, Rahul Goel, Shachi Paul
ACL (1)2
2022 Improving Top-K Decoding for Non-Autoregressive Semantic Parsing via Intent Conditioning
abstract
Semantic parsing (SP) is a core component of modern virtual assistants like Google Assistant and Amazon Alexa. While sequence-to-sequence based auto-regressive (AR) approaches are common for conversational SP, recent studies employ non-autoregressive (NAR) decoders and reduce inference latency while maintaining competitive parsing quality. However, a major drawback of NAR decoders is the difficulty of generating top-k (i.e., k-best) outputs with approaches such as beam search. To address this challenge, we propose a novel NAR semantic parser that introduces intent conditioning on the decoder. Inspired by the traditional intent and slot tagging parsers, we decouple the top-level intent prediction from the rest of a parse. As the top-level intent largely governs the syntax and semantics of a parse, the intent conditioning allows the model to better control beam search and improves the quality and diversity of top-k outputs. We introduce a hybrid teacher-forcing approach to avoid training and inference mismatch. We evaluate the proposed NAR on conversational SP datasets, TOP & TOPv2. Like the existing NAR models, we maintain the O(1) decoding time complexity while generating more diverse outputs and improving top-3 exact match (EM) by 2.4 points. In comparison with AR models, our model speeds up beam search inference by 6.7 times on CPU with competitive top-k EM.
Geunseob Oh, Rahul Goel, Christopher Hidey, Shachi Paul, Aditya Gupta 0001, Pararth Shah, Rushin Shah
COLING5
2021 TIMEDIAL: Temporal Commonsense Reasoning in Dialog
abstract
Lianhui Qin, Aditya Gupta, Shyam Upadhyay, Luheng He, Yejin Choi, Manaal Faruqui. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2021.
Lianhui Qin, Aditya Gupta 0001, Shyam Upadhyay, Luheng He, Yejin Choi 0001, Manaal Faruqui
ACL/IJCNLP (1)2
2019 Effective Use of Transformer Networks for Entity Tracking
abstract
Aditya Gupta, Greg Durrett. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). 2019.
Aditya Gupta 0001, Greg Durrett
EMNLP/IJCNLP (1)1
2018 Uncertain fuzzy self-organization based clustering: interval type-2 fuzzy approach to adaptive resonance theory
Shakaiba Majeed, Aditya Gupta 0001, Desh Raj, Frank Chung-Hoon Rhee
Inf. Sci.2