Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Maher Manoubi

dblp:66/8510 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data integration and cleaning · 77% Database system architecture and tuning · 23%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data integration and cleaning › data integration system
peer data management system
0.112010
Peer coordination through distributed triggers · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2010
Database system architecture and tuning › active database
trigger processing
0.012010
Peer coordination through distributed triggers · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2010
Distributed systems
distributed coordination
0.012010
Peer coordination through distributed triggers · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

declarative trigger language · 0.2active DBMS extension · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 Peer coordination through distributed triggers
abstract
This is a demonstration of data coordination in a peer data management system through the employment of distributed triggers. The latter express in a declarative manner individual security and consistency requirements of peers, that cannot be ensured by default in the P2P environment. Peers achieve to handle in a transparent way data changes that come from local and remote actions and events. The distributed triggers are implemented as an extension of the active functionality of a centralized commercial DBMS. The language and execution semantics of distributed triggers are integrated in the kernel of the DBMS such that the latter handles transparently and simultaneously both centralized and distributed triggers. Moreover, the management of distributed triggers is associated with a set of peer acquaintance and termination protocols which are incorporated in the centralized DBMS.
Verena Kantere, Maher Manoubi, Iluju Kiringa, Timos K. Sellis, John Mylopoulos
Proc. VLDB Endow.2