Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Marco Bonzanini
dblp:67/10265
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4 · 3 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers |
Information retrieval · 66% Data mining · 34% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information retrieval
text summarization |
0.5 | 3 | 2013 | Extractive summarisation via sentence removal: condensing relevant sentences into a short summary · SIGIR 2013 Opinion summarisation through sentence extraction: an investigation with movie reviews · SIGIR 2012 A knowledge-based approach for summarising opinions · SIGIR 2012 |
Information retrieval › text summarization
extractive summarization |
0.3 | 2 | 2013 | Extractive summarisation via sentence removal: condensing relevant sentences into a short summary · SIGIR 2013 Opinion summarisation through sentence extraction: an investigation with movie reviews · SIGIR 2012 |
Data mining › text mining
sentiment analysis |
0.3 | 2 | 2012 | Opinion summarisation through sentence extraction: an investigation with movie reviews · SIGIR 2012 A knowledge-based approach for summarising opinions · SIGIR 2012 |
Data mining › text mining › sentiment analysis
sentiment classification |
0.3 | 2 | 2012 | Opinion summarisation through sentence extraction: an investigation with movie reviews · SIGIR 2012 A knowledge-based approach for summarising opinions · SIGIR 2012 |
Information retrieval › text summarization
multi-document summarization |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Extractive summarisation via sentence removal: condensing relevant sentences into a short summary · SIGIR 2013 |
Information retrieval › text summarization
opinion summarization |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | A knowledge-based approach for summarising opinions · SIGIR 2012 |
Information retrieval › text summarization
personalized summarization |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | A knowledge-based approach for summarising opinions · SIGIR 2012 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sentence removal · 0.2divergence · 0.2cosine similarity · 0.2subjectivity detection · 0.1sentence extraction · 0.1knowledge-based summarization · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | Extractive summarisation via sentence removal: condensing relevant sentences into a short summaryabstractMany on-line services allow users to describe their opinions about a product or a service through a review. In order to help other users to find out the major opinion about a given topic, without the effort to read several reviews, multi-document summarisation is required. This research proposes an approach for extractive summarisation, supporting different scoring techniques, such as cosine similarity or divergence, as a method for finding representative sentences. The main contribution of this paper is the definition of an algorithm for sentence removal, developed to maximise the score between the summary and the original document. Instead of ranking the sentences and selecting the most important ones, the algorithm iteratively removes unimportant sentences until a desired compression rate is reached. Experimental results show that variations of the sentence removal algorithm provide good performance. Marco Bonzanini, Miguel Martinez-Alvarez, Thomas Roelleke |
SIGIR | 1 |
| 2012 | A knowledge-based approach for summarising opinionsabstractAutomatic Document Summarisation plays a central role in the process of providing the user with a quick access to information. Applications range from the generation of news headlines, to the aggregation of opinions extracted from reviews. Traditional topic-based summarisation systems are not always able to capture the sentiments expressed in a review. Major efforts in sentiment analysis have been put in the tasks of mining and classifying reviews according to their polarity. In this research, we investigate the use of summarisation techniques applied to reviews, and we propose a knowledge-based approach to summarisation, in the context of sentiment analysis. The proposed research is focused on three different aspects. Firstly, we investigate the application of summarisation techniques to sentiment classification. Capturing the key passage of a review can be beneficial for both a sentiment classifier, and for a user who could potentially understand the polarity of a review without reading the full text. Secondly, we investigate how to combine knowledge extracted from the reviews or integrated from external sources, with the purpose of producing opinion-oriented summaries. Thirdly, we analyse the possibility of generating personalised (user-oriented or query-biased) opinion-based summaries. Marco Bonzanini |
SIGIR | 1 |
| 2012 | Opinion summarisation through sentence extraction: an investigation with movie reviewsabstractIn on-line reviews, authors often use a short passage to describe the overall feeling about a product or a service. A review as a whole can mention many details not in line with the overall feeling, so capturing this key passage is important to understand the overall sentiment of the review. This paper investigates the use of extractive summarisation in the context of sentiment classification. The aim is to find the summary sentence, or the short passage, which gives the overall sentiment of the review, filtering out potential noisy information. Experiments on a movie review data-set show that subjectivity detection plays a central role in building summaries for sentiment classification. Subjective extracts carry the same polarity of the full text reviews, while statistical and positional approaches are not able to capture this aspect. Marco Bonzanini, Miguel Martinez-Alvarez, Thomas Roelleke |
SIGIR | 1 |
| 2011 | Cross-Lingual Text Fragment Alignment Using Divergence from Randomness
Sirvan Yahyaei, Marco Bonzanini, Thomas Roelleke |
SPIRE | 2 |