Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

W. Wesley Peterson

dblp:67/6784 · also William Wesley Peterson · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
14ranked-venue papers
7as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 14 · 7 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
13 papers
Coding theory · 100% Information theory · 0%

Topics — the 23 heaviest of 24, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › block codes
group codes
0.122010
Reflection Group Codes and Their Decoding · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2010
Group code equivalence and optimum codes · IRE Trans. Inf. Theory 1959
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › decoding › decoding problems
decoding complexity
0.112010
Reflection Group Codes and Their Decoding · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2010
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › decoding › decoding algorithms › optimal decoding
maximum-likelihood decoding
0.112010
Reflection Group Codes and Their Decoding · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2010
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › coded modulation
permutation modulation codes
0.122007
A Note on the Optimality of Variant-I Permutation Modulation Codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2007
A note on permutation modulation · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1997
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › decoding
decoding algorithms
0.011997
A note on permutation modulation · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1997
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
cyclic codes
0.041968
Polynomial codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1968
New generalizations of the Reed-Muller codes-I: Primitive codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1968
Some Results on Cyclic Codes which Are Invariant under the Affine Group and Their Application · Inf. Control. 1967
Coding theory
error-correcting codes
0.041968
New generalizations of the Reed-Muller codes-I: Primitive codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1968
Bounds for error-correcting codes (Corresp.) · IRE Trans. Inf. Theory 1962
Encoding and error-correction procedures for the Bose-Chaudhuri codes · IRE Trans. Inf. Theory 1960
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
reed-muller codes
0.021968
Polynomial codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1968
New generalizations of the Reed-Muller codes-I: Primitive codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1968
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › cyclic codes
BCH codes
0.031968
Polynomial codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1968
Encoding and error-correction procedures for the Bose-Chaudhuri codes · IRE Trans. Inf. Theory 1960
Two-Error Correcting Bose-Chaudhuri Codes are Quasi-Perfect · Inf. Control. 1960
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › block codes › linear code
quasi-cyclic codes
0.011969
Some Results on Quasi-Cyclic Codes · Inf. Control. 1969
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
reed-solomon codes
0.021968
Polynomial codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1968
New generalizations of the Reed-Muller codes-I: Primitive codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1968
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › cyclic codes
affine-invariant codes
0.011967
Some Results on Cyclic Codes which Are Invariant under the Affine Group and Their Application · Inf. Control. 1967
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › reed-muller codes
generalized reed-muller codes
0.011968
New generalizations of the Reed-Muller codes-I: Primitive codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1968
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › block codes › linear code
polynomial codes
0.011968
Polynomial codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1968
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
algebraic coding theory
0.011959
Group code equivalence and optimum codes · IRE Trans. Inf. Theory 1959
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › code classification
code equivalence
0.011959
Group code equivalence and optimum codes · IRE Trans. Inf. Theory 1959
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › decoding
majority-logic decoding
0.011968
Polynomial codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1968
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
optimal codes
0.011959
Group code equivalence and optimum codes · IRE Trans. Inf. Theory 1959
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
weight distribution
0.011968
New generalizations of the Reed-Muller codes-I: Primitive codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1968
Coding theory › covering codes
quasi-perfect codes
0.011960
Two-Error Correcting Bose-Chaudhuri Codes are Quasi-Perfect · Inf. Control. 1960
Information theory › statistical inference › detection and estimation
receiver operating characteristic
0.011954
The theory of signal detectability · Trans. IRE Prof. Group Inf. Theory 1954
Coding theory › source coding › universal coding
redundancy bounds
0.011960
Encoding and error-correction procedures for the Bose-Chaudhuri codes · IRE Trans. Inf. Theory 1960
Information theory › hypothesis testing
signal detection
0.011954
The theory of signal detectability · Trans. IRE Prof. Group Inf. Theory 1954

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reflection group theory · 0.1coordinate transformation · 0.0shift register implementation · 0.0neyman-pearson theory · 0.0muller method · 0.0mattson-solomon method · 0.0hypothesis testing · 0.0exhaustive search · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 Reflection Group Codes and Their Decoding
abstract
This paper builds on Mittelholzer and Lahtonen's study of group codes for the Gaussian channel based on reflection groups. A careful analysis of the action of a reflection group on its roots leads to the development of improved methods for encoding and decoding. The new algorithm is proved to achieve maximum likelihood decoding. The complexity of decoding is analyzed, and it is shown that a proper choice of the sequence of subgroups used in the algorithm can yield significant gains in the efficiency of decoding.
W. Wesley Peterson, James B. Nation, Marc P. C. Fossorier
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory1
2007 A Note on the Optimality of Variant-I Permutation Modulation Codes
abstract
In this correspondence, the optimality of variant-I permutation codes initially proposed by Slepian [see proc. IEEE, vol. 53, no. 3, p. 228-236, Mar. 1965] is shown in a simple way.
Marc P. C. Fossorier, James B. Nation, W. Wesley Peterson
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory3
1997 A note on permutation modulation
abstract
Slepian (1962) observed that the code points in an n-dimensional variant-1 permutation modulation code actually lie in an n-1-dimensional subspace. In this correspondence, a change of coordinates which gives the representation explicitly in n-1 dimensions is derived. Slepian's optimum decoding algorithm can be adapted to the codes in this form using an idea of Biglieri and Elia (1976).
W. Wesley Peterson
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory1
1995 Variance of Storage Requirements for B+-trees
W. Wesley Peterson
Acta Informatica1
1969 Some Results on Quasi-Cyclic Codes
C. L. Chen, W. Wesley Peterson, E. J. Weldon Jr.
Inf. Control.2
1968 New generalizations of the Reed-Muller codes-I: Primitive codes
abstract
First it is shown that all binary Reed-Muller codes with one digit dropped can be made cyclic by rearranging the digits. Then a natural generalization to the nonbinary case is presented, which also includes the Reed-Muller codes and Reed-Solomon codes as special cases. The generator polynomial is characterized and the minimum weight is established. Finally, some results on weight distribution are given.
Tadao Kasami, Shu Lin 0001, W. Wesley Peterson
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory3
1968 Polynomial codes
abstract
A class of cyclic codes is introduced by a polynomial approach that is an extension of the Mattson-Solomon method and of the Muller method. This class of codes contains several important classes of codes as subclasses, namely, BCH codes, Reed-Solomon codes, generalized primitive Reed-Muller codes, and finite geometry codes. Certain fundamental properties of this class of codes are derived. Some subclasses are shown to be majority-logic decodable.
Tadao Kasami, Shu Lin 0001, W. Wesley Peterson
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory3
1967 Some Results on Cyclic Codes which Are Invariant under the Affine Group and Their Application
Tadao Kasami, Shu Lin 0001, W. Wesley Peterson
Inf. Control.3
1963 Coding theory
W. Wesley Peterson, James L. Massey
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory1
1962 Bounds for error-correcting codes (Corresp.)
W. Wesley Peterson
IRE Trans. Inf. Theory1
1960 Two-Error Correcting Bose-Chaudhuri Codes are Quasi-Perfect
Daniel Gorenstein, W. Wesley Peterson, Neal Zierler
Inf. Control.2
1960 Encoding and error-correction procedures for the Bose-Chaudhuri codes
abstract
Bose and Ray-Chaudhuri have recently described a class of binary codes which for arbitrarymandtaret-error correcting and have length2^m - 1of which no more thanmtdigits are redundancy. This paper describes a simple error-correction procedure for these codes. Their cyclic structure is demonstrated and methods of exploiting it to implement the coding and correction procedure using shift registers are outlined. Closer bounds on the number of redundancy digits are derived.
W. Wesley Peterson
IRE Trans. Inf. Theory1
1959 Group code equivalence and optimum codes
abstract
This paper describes a search for optimum group codes using the IBM 704 computer. Some theory of the relationship between equivalent codes used in narrowing the search is described, and the method of searching is outlined. The newly found optimum codes are listed, along with a number of counter-examples to typical conjectures on binary group codes.
A. B. Fontaine, W. Wesley Peterson
IRE Trans. Inf. Theory2
1954 The theory of signal detectability
abstract
The problem of signal detectability treated in this paper is the following: Suppose an observer is given a voltage varying with time during a prescribed observation interval and is asked to decide whether its source is noise or is signal plus noise. What method should the observer use to make this decision, and what receiver is a realization of that method? After giving a discussion of theoretical aspects of this problem, the paper presents specific derivations of the optimum receiver for a number of cases of practical interest. The receiver whose output is the value of the likelihood ratio of the input voltage over the observation interval is the answer to the second question no matter which of the various optimum methods current in the literature is employed including the Neyman - Pearson observer, Siegert's ideal observer, and Woodward and Davies' "observer." An optimum observer required to give a yes or no answer simply chooses an operating level and concludes that the receiver input arose from signal plus noise only when this level is exceeded by the output of his likelihood ratio receiver. Associated with each such operating level are conditional probabilities that the answer is a false alarm and the conditional probability of detection. Graphs of these quantities called receiver operating characteristic, or ROC, curves are convenient for evaluating a receiver. If the detection problem is changed by varying, for example, the signal power, then a family of ROC curves is generated. Such things as betting curves can easily be obtained from such a family. The operating level to be used in a particular situation must be chosen by the observer. His choice will depend on such factors as the permissable false alarm rate, a priori probabilities, and relative importance of errors. With these theoretical aspects serving as an introduction, attention is devoted to the derivation of explicit formulas for likelihood ratio, and for probability of detection and probability of false alarm, for a number of particular cases. Stationary, band-limited, white Gaussian noise is assumed. The seven special cases which are presented were chosen from the simplest problems in signal detection which closely represent practical situations. Two of the cases form a basis for the best available approximation to the important problem of finding probability of detection when the starting time of the signal, signal frequency, or both, are unknown. Furthermore, in these two cases uncertainty in the signal can be varied, and a quantitative relationship between uncertainty and ability to detect signals is presented for these two rather general cases. The variety of examples presented should serve to suggest methods for attacking other simple signal detection problems and to give insight into problems too complicated to allow a direct solution.
W. Wesley Peterson, Theodore G. Birdsall, William C. Fox
Trans. IRE Prof. Group Inf. Theory1