Amy L. Lansky

dblp:67/7014 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
6as first author
0since 2021 · last 1998
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 5 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 3 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
6 papers
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 67% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 33%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Concurrent programming · 50% Program verification · 50%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Logic in computer science · 74% Automated reasoning and model checking · 26%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
multi-agent planning
0.011991
Localized Search for Multiagent Planning · IJCAI 1991
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning
parallel planning
0.011987
Localized Representation and Planning Methods for Parallel Domains · AAAI 1987
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
reactive planning
0.011987
Reactive Reasoning and Planning · AAAI 1987
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge structures
procedural knowledge
0.011986
Procedural knowledge · Proc. IEEE 1986
Logic in computer science
proof theory
0.011985
A Procedural Logic · IJCAI 1985
Program verification
concurrent program verification
0.011983
GEM: A Tool for Concurrency Specification and Verification · PODC 1983
Concurrent programming
event ordering
0.011983
GEM: A Tool for Concurrency Specification and Verification · PODC 1983
Automated reasoning and model checking › diagnosis
fault diagnosis
0.011986
Procedural knowledge · Proc. IEEE 1986

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

procedural semantics · 0.0partial order semantics · 0.0logic formulae · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1998 Localized Planning with Action-Based Constraints
Amy L. Lansky
Artif. Intell.1
1995 Scope and Abstraction: Two Criteria for Localized Planning
Amy L. Lansky, Lise Getoor
IJCAI1
1991 Localized Search for Multiagent Planning
Amy L. Lansky
IJCAI1
1988 Localized event-based reasoning for multiagent domains
abstract
This paper presents the GEM concurrency model and GEMPLAN, a multiagent planner based on this model. Unlike standard state‐based AI representations, GEM is unique in its explicit emphasis on events and domain structure. In particular, a world domain is modeled as a set of regions composed of interrelated events. Event‐based temporal‐logic constraints are then associated with each region to delimit legal domain behavior. The GEMPLAN planner directly reflects this emphasis on domain structure and constraints. It can be viewed as a general‐purpose constraint satisfaction facility which constructs a network of interrelated events (a “plan”) that is subdivided into regions (“subplans”), satisfies all applicable regional constraints, and also achieves some stated goal. GEMPLAN extends and generalizes previous planning architectures in the range of constraint forms it handles and in the flexibility of its constraint satisfaction search strategy. One critical aspect of our work has been an emphasis on localized reasoning—techniques that make explicit use of domain structure. For example, GEM localizes the applicability of domain constraints and imposes additional “locality constraints” on the basis of domain structure. Together, constraint localization and locality constraints provide semantic information that can be used to alleviate several aspects of the frame problem for multiagent domains. The GEMPLAN planner reflects the use of locality by subdividing its constraint satisfaction search space into regional planning search spaces. Utilizing constraint and property localization, GEMPLAN can pinpoint and rectify interactions among these regional search spaces, thus reducing the burden of “interaction analysis” ubiquitous to most planning systems. Because GEMPLAN is specifically geared towards parallel, multiagent domains, we believe that its natural application areas will include scheduling and other forms of organizational coordination.
Amy L. Lansky
Comput. Intell.1
1987 Reactive Reasoning and Planning
Michael P. Georgeff, Amy L. Lansky
AAAI2
1987 Localized Representation and Planning Methods for Parallel Domains
Amy L. Lansky, David S. Fogelsong
AAAI1
1986 Procedural knowledge
abstract
Much of commonsense knowledge about the real world is in the form of procedures or sequences of actions for achieving particular goals. In this paper, a formalism is presented for representing such knowledge using the notion of process. A declarative semantics for the representation is given, which allows a user to state facts about the effects of doing things in the problem domain of interest. An operational semantics is also provided, which shows how this knowledge can be used to achieve particular goals or to form intentions regarding their achievement. Given both semantics, our formalism additionally serves as an executable specification language suitable for constructing complex systems. A system based on this formalism is described, and examples involving control of an autonomous robot and fault diagnosis for NASA's space shuttle are provided.
Michael P. Georgeff, Amy L. Lansky
Proc. IEEE2
1985 A Procedural Logic
Michael P. Georgeff, Amy L. Lansky, Pierre Bessière
IJCAI2
1983 GEM: A Tool for Concurrency Specification and Verification
abstract
The GEM model of concurrent computation is presented. Each GEM computation consists of a set of partially ordered events, and represents a particular concurrent execution. Language primitives for concurrency, code segments, as well as concurrency problems may be described as logic formulae (restrictions) on the domain of possible GEM computations. An event-oriented method of program verification is also presented. GEM is unique in its ability to easily describe and reason about synchronization properties.
Amy L. Lansky, Susan S. Owicki
PODC1