Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tim Booth

dblp:67/7101 · also Timothy Booth · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-2470-9519ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 6 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequence assembly › genome assembly
de novo assembly
0.912025
Colora: a Snakemake workflow for complete chromosome-scale de novo genome assembly · Bioinform. 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequence assembly
genome assembly
0.912025
Colora: a Snakemake workflow for complete chromosome-scale de novo genome assembly · Bioinform. 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

snakemake workflow · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Colora: a Snakemake workflow for complete chromosome-scale de novo genome assembly
abstract
MOTIVATION: De novo assembly creates reference genomes that underpin many modern biodiversity and conservation studies. Large numbers of new genomes are being assembled by labs around the world. To avoid duplication of efforts and variable data quality, we desire a best-practice assembly process, implemented as an automated portable workflow. RESULTS: Here, we present Colora, a Snakemake workflow that produces chromosome-scale de novo primary or phased genome assemblies complete with organelles using Pacific Biosciences HiFi, Hi-C, and optionally Oxford Nanopore Technologies reads as input. Colora is a user-friendly, versatile, and reproducible pipeline that is ready to use by researchers looking for an automated way to obtain high-quality de novo genome assemblies. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The source code of Colora is available on GitHub (https://github.com/LiaOb21/colora) and has been deposited in Zenodo under DOI https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13321576. Colora is also available at the Snakemake Workflow Catalog (https://snakemake.github.io/snakemake-workflow-catalog/? usage=LiaOb21%2Fcolora).
Lia Obinu, Tim Booth, Heleen De Weerd, Urmi Trivedi, Andrea Porceddu
Bioinform.2
2015 Desktop as a Service Supporting Environmental 'omics
abstract
Within the Environmental 'omics community Bio-Linux is a widely used tool. This has the advantage of providing in a single deliverable package all necessary software and tools to support common analyses. With the growth in data volumes within the community and increasing constraints on user access and control over their own desktops an alternative delivery method of Bio-Linux and, in future, the Docker container environment is necessary. Within the EOS Cloud project we have constructed a Desktop as a Service system to centrally host virtual machines with these tools preconfigured and maintained. To enable efficient use of the resources we have enabled user controlled resource scaling so that users are able to utilise small scale VMs for task configuration and data manipulation and boost to a larger scale to run analysis applications all the while maintaining the user environment in a consistent manner. Alongside this within the project we have been developed tools to simplify the increasingly popular Docker software usage model. This includes ensure uniformity of behaviour between the host system and the running Docker container. Within the invitation only trial user community we identify two different exemplars groups and explain their usage and how the products and services developed within the project are useful for them. We conclude discussing the useful nature of Desktop as a Service, how it is of great benefit to the bioinformatics community but could also be of great use elsewhere, where the need for a stable user environment with applications already available that do not rely on local ICT support.
David Wallom, Tim Booth, Andy Bowery, Ben Collier, Phillip Kershaw, Anurag Priyam, Yannick Wurm, Dawn Field
e-Science2
2014 Community-driven development for computational biology at Sprints, Hackathons and Codefests
abstract
BACKGROUND: Computational biology comprises a wide range of technologies and approaches. Multiple technologies can be combined to create more powerful workflows if the individuals contributing the data or providing tools for its interpretation can find mutual understanding and consensus. Much conversation and joint investigation are required in order to identify and implement the best approaches. Traditionally, scientific conferences feature talks presenting novel technologies or insights, followed up by informal discussions during coffee breaks. In multi-institution collaborations, in order to reach agreement on implementation details or to transfer deeper insights in a technology and practical skills, a representative of one group typically visits the other. However, this does not scale well when the number of technologies or research groups is large. Conferences have responded to this issue by introducing Birds-of-a-Feather (BoF) sessions, which offer an opportunity for individuals with common interests to intensify their interaction. However, parallel BoF sessions often make it hard for participants to join multiple BoFs and find common ground between the different technologies, and BoFs are generally too short to allow time for participants to program together. RESULTS: This report summarises our experience with computational biology Codefests, Hackathons and Sprints, which are interactive developer meetings. They are structured to reduce the limitations of traditional scientific meetings described above by strengthening the interaction among peers and letting the participants determine the schedule and topics. These meetings are commonly run as loosely scheduled "unconferences" (self-organized identification of participants and topics for meetings) over at least two days, with early introductory talks to welcome and organize contributors, followed by intensive collaborative coding sessions. We summarise some prominent achievements of those meetings and describe differences in how these are organised, how their audience is addressed, and their outreach to their respective communities. CONCLUSIONS: Hackathons, Codefests and Sprints share a stimulating atmosphere that encourages participants to jointly brainstorm and tackle problems of shared interest in a self-driven proactive environment, as well as providing an opportunity for new participants to get involved in collaborative projects.
Steffen Möller, Enis Afgan, Michael Banck, Raoul Jean Pierre Bonnal, Tim Booth, John Chilton, Peter J. A. Cock, Markus Gumbel, Nomi L. Harris, Richard C. G. Holland, Matús Kalas, László Kaján, Eri Kibukawa, David R. Powell, Pjotr Prins, Jacqueline Quinn, Olivier Sallou, Francesco Strozzi, Torsten Seemann, Clare Sloggett, Stian Soiland-Reyes, William Spooner, Sascha Steinbiss, Andreas Tille, Anthony J. Travis, Roman Guimera, Toshiaki Katayama, Brad A. Chapman
BMC Bioinform.5
2012 Bio-Linux as a tool for bioinformatics training
abstract
Because of the ever-increasing application of next-generation sequencing (NGS) in research, and the expectation of faster experiment turn-around, it is becoming unfeasible and unscalable for analysis to be done exclusively by existing trained bioinformaticians. Instead, researchers and bench biologists are performing at least parts of most analyses. In order for this to be realized, two conditions must be satisfied: (1) well designed and accessible tools need to be made available, and (2) researchers and biologists need to be trained to use such tools in order to confidently handle high volumes of NGS data. Bio-Linux is a fully featured, powerful, configurable and easy to maintain bioinformatics workstation and helps on both counts by offering well over one hundred bioinformatics tools packaged into a single distribution, easily accessible and readily usable. Bio-Linux is also accessible in the form of virtual images or on the cloud, thus providing researchers with immediate access to scalable compute infrastructure required to run the analysis. Furthermore this paper discusses how bioinformatics training on Bio-Linux is helping to bridge the data production and analysis gap.
Tim Booth, Mesude Bicak, Hyun Soon Gweon, Dawn Field, Enis Afgan
BIBE1
2012 Cloud BioLinux: pre-configured and on-demand bioinformatics computing for the genomics community
abstract
BACKGROUND: A steep drop in the cost of next-generation sequencing during recent years has made the technology affordable to the majority of researchers, but downstream bioinformatic analysis still poses a resource bottleneck for smaller laboratories and institutes that do not have access to substantial computational resources. Sequencing instruments are typically bundled with only the minimal processing and storage capacity required for data capture during sequencing runs. Given the scale of sequence datasets, scientific value cannot be obtained from acquiring a sequencer unless it is accompanied by an equal investment in informatics infrastructure. RESULTS: Cloud BioLinux is a publicly accessible Virtual Machine (VM) that enables scientists to quickly provision on-demand infrastructures for high-performance bioinformatics computing using cloud platforms. Users have instant access to a range of pre-configured command line and graphical software applications, including a full-featured desktop interface, documentation and over 135 bioinformatics packages for applications including sequence alignment, clustering, assembly, display, editing, and phylogeny. Each tool's functionality is fully described in the documentation directly accessible from the graphical interface of the VM. Besides the Amazon EC2 cloud, we have started instances of Cloud BioLinux on a private Eucalyptus cloud installed at the J. Craig Venter Institute, and demonstrated access to the bioinformatic tools interface through a remote connection to EC2 instances from a local desktop computer. Documentation for using Cloud BioLinux on EC2 is available from our project website, while a Eucalyptus cloud image and VirtualBox Appliance is also publicly available for download and use by researchers with access to private clouds. CONCLUSIONS: Cloud BioLinux provides a platform for developing bioinformatics infrastructures on the cloud. An automated and configurable process builds Virtual Machines, allowing the development of highly customized versions from a shared code base. This shared community toolkit enables application specific analysis platforms on the cloud by minimizing the effort required to prepare and maintain them.
Konstantinos Krampis, Tim Booth, Brad A. Chapman, Bela Tiwari, Mesude Bicak, Dawn Field, Karen E. Nelson
BMC Bioinform.2
2008 Data capture in bioinformatics: requirements and experiences with Pedro
abstract
BACKGROUND: The systematic capture of appropriately annotated experimental data is a prerequisite for most bioinformatics analyses. Data capture is required not only for submission of data to public repositories, but also to underpin integrated analysis, archiving, and sharing - both within laboratories and in collaborative projects. The widespread requirement to capture data means that data capture and annotation are taking place at many sites, but the small scale of the literature on tools, techniques and experiences suggests that there is work to be done to identify good practice and reduce duplication of effort. RESULTS: This paper reports on experience gained in the deployment of the Pedro data capture tool in a range of representative bioinformatics applications. The paper makes explicit the requirements that have recurred when capturing data in different contexts, indicates how these requirements are addressed in Pedro, and describes case studies that illustrate where the requirements have arisen in practice. CONCLUSION: Data capture is a fundamental activity for bioinformatics; all biological data resources build on some form of data capture activity, and many require a blend of import, analysis and annotation. Recurring requirements in data capture suggest that model-driven architectures can be used to construct data capture infrastructures that can be rapidly configured to meet the needs of individual use cases. We have described how one such model-driven infrastructure, namely Pedro, has been deployed in representative case studies, and discussed the extent to which the model-driven approach has been effective in practice.
Daniel Jameson, Kevin L. Garwood, Christopher Garwood, Tim Booth, Pinar Alper, Stephen G. Oliver, Norman W. Paton
BMC Bioinform.4