Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jon Gray
dblp:67/7475
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Services computing and microservices · 77% Requirements engineering and software design · 23% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Services computing and microservices
service-oriented architecture |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | A method for selecting SOA pilot projects including a pilot metrics framework · ICSE 2011 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
metrics framework · 0.1case study · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | A method for selecting SOA pilot projects including a pilot metrics frameworkabstractMany organizations are introducing Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) as part of their business transformation projects to take advantage of the proposed benefits associated with using SOA. However, in many cases organizations don't necessarily know on which projects introducing SOA would be of value and show real benefits to the organization. In this paper we outline a method and pilot metrics framework (PMF) to help organization's select from a set of candidate projects those which would be most suitable for piloting SOA. The PMF is used as part of a method based on identifying a set of benefit and risk criteria, investigating each of the candidate projects, mapping them to the criteria and then selecting the most suitable project(s). The paper outlines a case study where the PMF was applied in a large government organization to help them select pilot projects and develop an overall strategy for introducing SOA into their organization. Liam O'Brien, James Gibson, Jon Gray |
ICSE | 3 |
| 1993 | Parallel software engineering with PARSEabstractThe aims of the PARSE methodology are described, and the process graph design notation is summarised. Process graphs are a new graphical notation for describing systems comprising a collection of parallel processes in a language- and architecture-independent fashion. Further, process graph designs can be mechanically transformed into Petri nets to give a more detailed, executable design specification. Some simple process graphs and their corresponding Petri nets are described in order to demonstrate this transformation process. A more extensive example then illustrates the initial stages of the design process in practice.> Ian Gorton, Innes Ritchie, Jon Gray |
COMPSAC | 3 |
| 1993 | Designing parallel database programs using PARSEabstractThe problems of constructing parallel programs are considered and the aims of the PARSE parallel software engineering methodology are introduced. PARSE is a multi-stage methodology that covers logical and physical design, design verification, and implementation strategy. The first stage in the methodology involves the use of process graphs which provide a language and architecture independent notation for partitioning the problem into processes and specifying the communication relationships between them. This paper gives an outline of the PARSE methodology and describes the process graph notation. The use of the notation is illustrated with an example of a design for a parallel database system.> Jon Gray, Ian Gorton, Innes Ritchie |
COMPSAC | 1 |