Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Rachel Witty

dblp:67/8523 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Storage systems · 77% Distributed systems · 23%
Network and information security
1 paper
Biometric security · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Storage systems
data management
0.112010
Towards long term data quality in a large scale biometrics experiment · HPDC 2010
Biometric security
biometric database
0.012010
Towards long term data quality in a large scale biometrics experiment · HPDC 2010
Distributed systems › replication
data replication
0.012010
Towards long term data quality in a large scale biometrics experiment · HPDC 2010
Distributed systems
fault tolerance
0.012010
Towards long term data quality in a large scale biometrics experiment · HPDC 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

metadata logging · 0.2data replication · 0.2automated data validation · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 Towards long term data quality in a large scale biometrics experiment
abstract
Quality of data plays a very important role in any scientific research. In this paper we present some of the challenges that we face in managing and maintaining data quality for a terabyte scale biometrics repository. We have developed a step by step model to capture, ingest, validate, and prepare data for biometrics research. During these processes, there are many hidden errors which can be introduced into the data. Those errors can affect the overall quality of data, and thus can skew the results of biometrics research. We discuss necessary steps we have taken to reduce and eliminate the errors. Steps such as data replication, automated data validation, and logging metadata changes are both necessary and crucial to improve the quality and reliability of our data.
Hoang Bui, Diane Wright, Clarence Helm, Rachel Witty, Patrick J. Flynn, Douglas Thain
HPDC4