Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Guangyan Sun
dblp:67/9556
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Vision and language · 38% Language models and text generation · 19% Efficient and distributed learning · 19% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Emerging computing paradigms · 56% Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 44% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
parameter-efficient fine-tuning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MEPT: Mixture of Expert Prompt Tuning as a Manifold Mapper · EMNLP 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
prompt tuning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MEPT: Mixture of Expert Prompt Tuning as a Manifold Mapper · EMNLP 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › visual grounding › language-guided segmentation
reasoning segmentation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Visual Agents as Fast and Slow Thinkers · ICLR 2025 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
visual agent |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Visual Agents as Fast and Slow Thinkers · ICLR 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
visual question answering |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Visual Agents as Fast and Slow Thinkers · ICLR 2025 |
Emerging computing paradigms
approximate and stochastic computing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | DS-TIDE: Harnessing Dynamical Systems for Efficient Time-Independent Differential Equation Solving · MICRO 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
commonsense reasoning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Visual Agents as Fast and Slow Thinkers · ICLR 2025 |
Emerging computing paradigms
neuromorphic computing |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | DS-TIDE: Harnessing Dynamical Systems for Efficient Time-Independent Differential Equation Solving · MICRO 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
switch adapter · 0.9mixture of experts · 0.9manifold learning · 0.9hierarchical reasoning · 0.9dynamical systems · 0.9CMOS-compatible processor design · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Uncertainty Quantification for Multiple-Choice Questions is Just One-Token DeepabstractMultiple-choice question (MCQ) benchmarks such as MMLU and GPQA are widely used to assess the capabilities of large language models (LLMs). While accuracy remains the standard evaluation metric, recent work has introduced uncertainty quantification (UQ) methods, such as entropy, conformal prediction, and verbalized confidence, as complementary measures of model reliability and calibration. However, we find that these UQ methods, when applied to MCQ tasks, are unexpectedly fragile. Specifically, we show that fine-tuning a model on just 1,000 examples to adjust the probability of the first generated token, under the common prompting setup where the model is instructed to output only a single answer choice, can systematically distort a broad range of UQ methods across models, prompts, and domains, all while leaving answer accuracy unchanged. We validate this phenomenon through extensive experiments on five instruction-tuned LLMs, tested under standard prompting, zero-shot chain-of-thought reasoning, and a biomedical question answering setting. In all cases, models retain similar accuracy but exhibit significantly degraded calibration. These results suggest that current UQ practices for MCQs are ''one-token deep'', driven more by first-token decoding behavior than by any deeper representation of uncertainty, and are easily manipulated through minimal interventions. Our findings call for more robust and interpretable approaches to uncertainty estimation, particularly in structured formats like MCQs, where confidence signals are often reduced to token-level heuristics. Qingcheng Zeng, Mingyu Jin, Qinkai Yu, Zhenting Wang, Wenyue Hua, Guangyan Sun, Yanda Meng, Shiqing Ma, Qifan Wang 0001, Felix Juefei-Xu, Fan Yang 0023, Kaize Ding, Ruixiang Tang, Yongfeng Zhang 0003 |
CIKM | 6 |
| 2025 | MEPT: Mixture of Expert Prompt Tuning as a Manifold MapperabstractRunjia Zeng, Guangyan Sun, Qifan Wang, Tong Geng, Sohail Dianat, Xiaotian Han, Raghuveer Rao, Xueling Zhang, Cheng Han, Lifu Huang, Dongfang Liu. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2025. Runjia Zeng, Guangyan Sun, Qifan Wang 0001, Tong Geng, Sohail A. Dianat, Raghuveer M. Rao, Xueling Zhang, Cheng Han 0001, Lifu Huang, Dongfang Liu |
EMNLP | 2 |
| 2025 | Visual Agents as Fast and Slow ThinkersabstractAchieving human-level intelligence requires refining cognitive distinctions between \textit{System 1} and \textit{System 2} thinking. While contemporary AI, driven by large language models, demonstrates human-like traits, it falls short of genuine cognition. Transitioning from structured benchmarks to real-world scenarios presents challenges for visual agents, often leading to inaccurate and overly confident responses. To address the challenge, we introduce \textbf{\textsc{FaST}}, which incorporates the \textbf{Fa}st and \textbf{S}low \textbf{T}hinking mechanism into visual agents. \textsc{FaST} employs a switch adapter to dynamically select between \textit{System 1/2} modes, tailoring the problem-solving approach to different task complexity. It tackles uncertain and unseen objects by adjusting model confidence and integrating new contextual data. With this novel design, we advocate a \textit{flexible system}, \textit{hierarchical reasoning} capabilities, and a \textit{transparent decision-making} pipeline, all of which contribute to its ability to emulate human-like cognitive processes in visual intelligence. Empirical results demonstrate that \textsc{FaST} outperforms various well-known baselines, achieving 80.8\% accuracy over $VQA^{v2}$ for visual question answering and 48.7\% $GIoU$ score over ReasonSeg for reasoning segmentation, demonstrate \textsc{FaST}'s superior performance. Extensive testing validates the efficacy and robustness of \textsc{FaST}'s core components, showcasing its potential to advance the development of cognitive visual agents in AI systems. Guangyan Sun, Mingyu Jin, Zhenting Wang, Siqi Ma 0005, Qifan Wang 0001, Tong Geng, Ying Nian Wu, Yongfeng Zhang 0003, Dongfang Liu |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2025 | DS-TIDE: Harnessing Dynamical Systems for Efficient Time-Independent Differential Equation SolvingabstractTime-Independent Differential Equations (TIDEs) are central to modeling equilibrium behavior across a wide range of scientific and engineering domains.Conventional numerical solvers offer reliable solutions but incur significant computational costs due to fine-grained discretization and iterative procedures.Machine learning-based approaches address this by replacing iterative solving with one-time inference; however, they inevitably sacrifice accuracy and incur even higher costs once the training of sophisticated models is taken into account.Consequently, designing a TIDE solver that achieves high accuracy, broad applicability, and exceptional computational efficiency remains a fundamental challenge.In this paper, we propose DS-TIDE, a novel hardware solver that is inspired by, and subsequently leverages, the intrinsic connection between Dynamical Systems (DS) and Differential Equations (DE) to efficiently and accurately solve TIDEs.DS-TIDE employs a CMOS-compatible DS-based processor, whose physical states evolve under carefully designed DE-driven dynamics and naturally converge to equilibria -the solutions of the target TIDE within ∼ 1𝜇𝑠.To enhance expressivity, DS-TIDE incorporates Heterogeneous Dynamics with Temporal Layering (HDTL), which solves TIDEs through a three-stage DS evolution -conditioning, solving, and decoding -each governed by specialized dynamics.The entire evolution process is analogous to an infinitely deep neural network temporally unrolled, offering the system the capability of representing complex equations.Furthermore, DS-TIDE is equipped Chuan Liu 0001, Chunshu Wu, Ruibing Song, Guangyan Sun, Ying Nian Wu, Yousu Chen, Ang Li 0006, Tong Geng |
MICRO | 4 |
| 2024 | A Language-independent Quantitative Analysis Method on Conformance between Legal Contract and Smart ContractabstractThe analysis on conformance between legal contracts and smart contracts is necessary and precondition for constructing the secure blockchain. Currently, the analysis method is the language-dependent single qualitative analysis. There does not exist quantitative metrics and quantitative analysis methods. Hence, the quantitative metric and language-independent quantitative analysis method are proposed to analyze the conformance between legal contract and smart contract. First, the definitions and metrics of partial conformance and complete conformance are proposed, and then rewrite logic and language-independent symbol execution are used to construct a language-independent quantitative method; then, the executable formal semantic for legal contract description language Business Process Model and Notation2.0 (BPMN2.0) is presented. Finally, the conformance of the five main methods for mapping BPMN2.0 legal contracts to Solidity smart contracts is analyzed. The results show that three methods have partial conformance, one method has complete conformance, and method has neither complete conformance nor partial conformance. Guangyan Sun, Bo Meng 0005 |
Distributed Ledger Technol. Res. Pract. | 4 |