Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
William Austin Webb
dblp:68/10453
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 61% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 39% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models |
0.2 | 2 | 2012 | Learning Efficient Markov Networks · NIPS 2010 A Tractable First-Order Probabilistic Logic · AAAI 2012 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › probabilistic reasoning › probabilistic logic
first-order probabilistic logic |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | A Tractable First-Order Probabilistic Logic · AAAI 2012 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › probabilistic reasoning
probabilistic logic |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | A Tractable First-Order Probabilistic Logic · AAAI 2012 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
tractable inference |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | A Tractable First-Order Probabilistic Logic · AAAI 2012 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › bayesian network
context-specific independence |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Learning Efficient Markov Networks · NIPS 2010 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › markov random field
markov network structure learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Learning Efficient Markov Networks · NIPS 2010 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › probabilistic reasoning › probabilistic logic
markov logic networks |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | A Tractable First-Order Probabilistic Logic · AAAI 2012 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
probabilistic performance guarantees · 0.1greedy search · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | A Tractable First-Order Probabilistic LogicabstractTractable subsets of first-order logic are a central topic in AI research. Several of these formalisms have been used as the basis for first-order probabilistic languages. However, these are intractable, losing the original motivation. Here we propose the first non-trivially tractable first-order probabilistic language. It is a subset of Markov logic, and uses probabilistic class and part hierarchies to control complexity. We call it TML (Tractable Markov Logic). We show that TML knowledge bases allow for efficient inference even when the corresponding graphical models have very high treewidth. We also show how probabilistic inheritance, default reasoning, and other inference patterns can be carried out in TML. TML opens up the prospect of efficient large-scale first-order probabilistic inference. Pedro M. Domingos, William Austin Webb |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2010 | Learning Efficient Markov NetworksabstractWe present an algorithm for learning high-treewidth Markov networks where inference is still tractable. This is made possible by exploiting context specific independence and determinism in the domain. The class of models our algorithm can learn has the same desirable properties as thin junction trees: polynomial inference, closed form weight learning, etc., but is much broader. Our algorithm searches for a feature that divides the state space into subspaces where the remaining variables decompose into independent subsets (conditioned on the feature or its negation) and recurses on each subspace/subset of variables until no useful new features can be found. We provide probabilistic performance guarantees for our algorithm under the assumption that the maximum feature length is k (the treewidth can be much larger) and dependences are of bounded strength. We also propose a greedy version of the algorithm that, while forgoing these guarantees, is much more efficient.Experiments on a variety of domains show that our approach compares favorably with thin junction trees and other Markov network structure learners. Vibhav Gogate, William Austin Webb, Pedro M. Domingos |
NIPS | 2 |