Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Arpit Sharma 0001

dblp:68/11054-1 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0002-0966-2890ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 54% Information extraction and text analysis · 46%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
commonsense reasoning
0.622019
Combining Knowledge Hunting and Neural Language Models to Solve the Winograd Schema Challenge · ACL (1) 2019
Towards Addressing the Winograd Schema Challenge - Building and Using a Semantic Parser and a Knowledge Hunting Module · IJCAI 2015
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › commonsense reasoning
winograd schema challenge
0.622019
Combining Knowledge Hunting and Neural Language Models to Solve the Winograd Schema Challenge · ACL (1) 2019
Towards Addressing the Winograd Schema Challenge - Building and Using a Semantic Parser and a Knowledge Hunting Module · IJCAI 2015
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
semantic parsing
0.522016
Towards Understanding Natural Language: Semantic Parsing, Commonsense Knowledge Acquisition and Applications · IJCAI 2016
Towards Addressing the Winograd Schema Challenge - Building and Using a Semantic Parser and a Knowledge Hunting Module · IJCAI 2015
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
coreference resolution
0.412019
Combining Knowledge Hunting and Neural Language Models to Solve the Winograd Schema Challenge · ACL (1) 2019
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › coreference resolution
pronoun resolution
0.412019
Combining Knowledge Hunting and Neural Language Models to Solve the Winograd Schema Challenge · ACL (1) 2019
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › commonsense reasoning
commonsense knowledge acquisition
0.212016
Towards Understanding Natural Language: Semantic Parsing, Commonsense Knowledge Acquisition and Applications · IJCAI 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

knowledge hunting · 0.6neural language model · 0.4explicit reasoning · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Combining Knowledge Hunting and Neural Language Models to Solve the Winograd Schema Challenge
abstract
Winograd Schema Challenge (WSC) is a pronoun resolution task which seems to require reasoning with commonsense knowledge.The needed knowledge is not present in the given text.Automatic extraction of the needed knowledge is a bottleneck in solving the challenge.The existing state-of-the-art approach uses the knowledge embedded in their pretrained language model.However, the language models only embed part of the knowledge, the ones related to frequently co-existing concepts.This limits the performance of such models on the WSC problems.In this work, we build-up on the language model based methods and augment them with a commonsense knowledge hunting (using automatic extraction from text) module and an explicit reasoning module.Our end-to-end system built in such a manner improves on the accuracy of two of the available language model based approaches by 5.53% and 7.7% respectively.Overall our system achieves the state-of-theart accuracy of 71.06% on the WSC dataset, an improvement of 7.36% over the previous best.
Ashok Prakash, Arpit Sharma 0001, Arindam Mitra, Chitta Baral
ACL (1)2
2019 Using Answer Set Programming for Commonsense Reasoning in the Winograd Schema Challenge
abstract
Abstract The Winograd Schema Challenge (WSC) is a natural language understanding task proposed as an alternative to the Turing test in 2011. In this work we attempt to solve WSC problems by reasoning with additional knowledge. By using an approach built on top of graph-subgraph isomorphism encoded using Answer Set Programming (ASP) we were able to handle 240 out of 291 WSC problems. The ASP encoding allows us to add additional constraints in an elaboration tolerant manner. In the process we present a graph based representation of WSC problems as well as relevant commonsense knowledge.
Arpit Sharma 0001
Theory Pract. Log. Program.1
2016 Towards Understanding Natural Language: Semantic Parsing, Commonsense Knowledge Acquisition and Applications
Arpit Sharma 0001
IJCAI1
2015 Towards Addressing the Winograd Schema Challenge - Building and Using a Semantic Parser and a Knowledge Hunting Module
Arpit Sharma 0001, Nguyen Ha Vo, Somak Aditya, Chitta Baral
IJCAI1