Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Klaus-Uwe Höffgen

dblp:68/2159 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
10ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2002
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 7 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Learning theory · 55% Graph learning · 37% Trustworthy machine learning · 8%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Graph learning
random walk learning
0.022002
Exploiting Random Walks for Learning · Inf. Comput. 2002
Exploiting Random Walks for Learning · COLT 1994
Machine learning › Learning theory
PAC learning
0.021994
Exploiting Random Walks for Learning · COLT 1994
Robust Trainability of Single Neurons · COLT 1992
Machine learning › Learning theory
online learning
0.011994
Exploiting Random Walks for Learning · COLT 1994
Machine learning › Learning theory › computational learning theory
passive learning
0.011994
Exploiting Random Walks for Learning · COLT 1994
Graph algorithms and graph theory
random walk
0.012002
Exploiting Random Walks for Learning · Inf. Comput. 2002
Machine learning › Learning theory
distribution learning
0.011993
Learning and Robust Learning of Product Distributions · COLT 1993
Machine learning › Learning theory › distribution learning
product distributions
0.011993
Learning and Robust Learning of Product Distributions · COLT 1993
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
robust learning
0.011993
Learning and Robust Learning of Product Distributions · COLT 1993
Machine learning › Learning theory
computational learning theory
0.011992
Robust Trainability of Single Neurons · COLT 1992
Machine learning › Learning theory › PAC learning
halfspace learning
0.011992
Robust Trainability of Single Neurons · COLT 1992

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

random walk · 0.1learning theory · 0.1membership queries · 0.0PAC learning · 0.0linear programming · 0.0complexity theory · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2002 Exploiting Random Walks for Learning
Peter L. Bartlett, Paul Fischer, Klaus-Uwe Höffgen
Inf. Comput.3
1997 PAC-Learning from General Examples
Paul Fischer, Klaus-Uwe Höffgen, Hanno Lefmann
Theor. Comput. Sci.2
1996 Trial and Error. A New Approach to Space-Bounded Learning
Foued Ameur, Paul Fischer, Klaus-Uwe Höffgen, Friedhelm Meyer auf der Heide
Acta Informatica3
1995 Robust Trainability of Single Neurons
Klaus-Uwe Höffgen, Hans Simon 0001, Kevin S. Van Horn
J. Comput. Syst. Sci.1
1994 Exploiting Random Walks for Learning
abstract
In this paper we consider an approach to passive learning. In contrast to the classical PAC model we do not assume that the examples are independently drawn according to an underlying distribution, but that they are generated by a time-driven process. We define deterministic and probabilistic learning models of this sort and investigate the relationships between them and with other models. The fact that successive examples are related can often be used to gain additional information similar to the information gained by membership queries. We show that this can be used to design on-line prediction algorithms. In particular, we present efficient algorithms for exactly identifying Boolean threshold functions, 2-term RSE, and 2-term-DNF, when the examples are generated by a random walk on {0,1}n.
Peter L. Bartlett, Paul Fischer, Klaus-Uwe Höffgen
COLT3
1994 Computing a Maximum Axis-Aligned Rectangle in a Convex Polygon
Paul Fischer, Klaus-Uwe Höffgen
Inf. Process. Lett.2
1993 Learning and Robust Learning of Product Distributions
abstract
Article Learning and robust learning of product distributions Share on Author: Klaus-U. Höffgen View Profile Authors Info & Claims COLT '93: Proceedings of the sixth annual conference on Computational learning theoryAugust 1993 Pages 77–83https://doi.org/10.1145/168304.168314Published:01 August 1993 21citation479DownloadsMetricsTotal Citations21Total Downloads479Last 12 Months23Last 6 weeks1 Get Citation AlertsNew Citation Alert added!This alert has been successfully added and will be sent to:You will be notified whenever a record that you have chosen has been cited.To manage your alert preferences, click on the button below.Manage my AlertsNew Citation Alert!Please log in to your account Save to BinderSave to BinderCreate a New BinderNameCancelCreateExport CitationPublisher SiteGet Access
Klaus-Uwe Höffgen
COLT1
1993 Approximations with Axis-Aligned Rectangles (Extended Abstract)
Paul Fischer, Klaus-Uwe Höffgen, Hanno Lefmann, Tomasz Luczak 0001
FCT2
1993 Computational Limitations on Training Sigmoid Neural Networks
Klaus-Uwe Höffgen
Inf. Process. Lett.1
1992 Robust Trainability of Single Neurons
abstract
We investigate the problem of learning concepts by presenting labeled and randomly chosen training–examples to single neurons. It is well-known that linear halfspaces are learnable by the method of linear programming. The corresponding (Mc-Culloch-Pitts) neurons are therefore efficiently trainable to learn an unknown halfspace from examples. We want to analyze how fast the learning performance degrades when the representational power of the neuron is overstrained, i.e., if more complex concepts than just halfspaces are allowed. We show that a neuron cannot efficently find its probably almost optimal adjustment (unless RP = NP). If the weights and the threshold of the neuron have a fixed constant bound on their coding length, the situation is even worse: There is in general no polynomial time training method which bounds the resulting prediction error of the neuron by k.opt for a fixed constant k (unless RP = NP). Other variants of learning more complex concepts than halfspaces by single neurons are also investigated. We show that neither heuristical learning nor learning by sigmoidal neurons with a constant reject-rate is efficiently possible (unless RP = NP).
Klaus-Uwe Höffgen, Hans Simon 0001
COLT1