Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jürgen Pulkus

dblp:68/3301 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
2 papers
Hardware security and side channels · 50% Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 50%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
cryptographic implementation
0.212016
Reducing the Number of Non-linear Multiplications in Masking Schemes · CHES 2016
Hardware security and side channels › side-channel attack
masking countermeasure
0.212016
Reducing the Number of Non-linear Multiplications in Masking Schemes · CHES 2016
Hardware security and side channels › side-channel countermeasures
blinding
0.012004
Switching Blindings with a View Towards IDEA · CHES 2004
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
block cipher
0.012004
Switching Blindings with a View Towards IDEA · CHES 2004
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › block cipher
IDEA
0.012004
Switching Blindings with a View Towards IDEA · CHES 2004
Hardware security and side channels
side-channel countermeasures
0.012004
Switching Blindings with a View Towards IDEA · CHES 2004

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

masking · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 On robust strong-non-interferent low-latency multiplications
abstract
Abstract The overarching goal of this work is to present new theoretical and practical tools to implement −probing security. In this work, a low‐latency multiplication gadget that is secure against probing attacks that exploit logic glitches in the circuit is presented. The gadget is the first of its kind to present a 1‐cycle input‐to‐output latency while belonging to the class of probing security by optimized composition gadgets [6]. In particular, the authors show that it is possible to construct robust‐‐strong‐non‐interferent gadgets without compromising on latency with a moderate increase in area. The authors provide a theoretical proof for the robustness of the gadget and show that, for , the amount of randomness required can even be reduced without compromising on robustness.
Maria Chiara Molteni, Jürgen Pulkus, Vittorio Zaccaria
IET Inf. Secur.2
2016 Reducing the Number of Non-linear Multiplications in Masking Schemes
Jürgen Pulkus, Srinivas Vivek 0001
CHES1
2004 Switching Blindings with a View Towards IDEA
Olaf Neiße, Jürgen Pulkus
CHES2