Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Peter Orbanz
dblp:68/4162
· DBLP profile ↗
15ranked-venue papers
5as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 13 · 4 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
12 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 56% Learning theory · 17% Generative modeling · 10% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational science and engineering · 100% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers |
Computational fabrication · 73% Geometric modeling and processing · 22% Image and video processing · 5% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
GPUs and heterogeneous computing · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Data mining · 100% |
Topics — the 20 heaviest of 25, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference › causal discovery
bivariate causal discovery |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Distinguishing Cause from Effect with Causal Velocity Models · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
causal discovery |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Distinguishing Cause from Effect with Causal Velocity Models · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
markov chain monte carlo |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Efficiently Vectorized MCMC on Modern Accelerators · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference › causal model
structural causal model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Distinguishing Cause from Effect with Causal Velocity Models · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › function approximation › representation learning for reinforcement learning
symmetry exploitation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Diagonal Symmetrization of Neural Network Solvers for the Many-Electron Schrödinger Equation · ICML 2025 |
Computational science and engineering › scientific machine learning
neural network solver |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Diagonal Symmetrization of Neural Network Solvers for the Many-Electron Schrödinger Equation · ICML 2025 |
Computational science and engineering › computational physics
quantum many-body simulation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Diagonal Symmetrization of Neural Network Solvers for the Many-Electron Schrödinger Equation · ICML 2025 |
Computational fabrication › material design
mechanical metamaterial design |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Designing Mechanical Meta-Materials by Learning Equivariant Flows · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
graphical model inference |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | The Graph Pencil Method: Mapping Subgraph Densities to Stochastic Block Models · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
stochastic block model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | The Graph Pencil Method: Mapping Subgraph Densities to Stochastic Block Models · NeurIPS 2023 |
Data mining › structured data mining
graph mining |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | The Graph Pencil Method: Mapping Subgraph Densities to Stochastic Block Models · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
bayesian nonparametric model |
0.5 | 4 | 2015 | Bayesian Models of Graphs, Arrays and Other Exchangeable Random Structures · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2015 Random function priors for exchangeable arrays with applications to graphs and relational data · NIPS 2012 Construction of Nonparametric Bayesian Models from Parametric Bayes Equations · NIPS 2009 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds
compression bounds |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Non-vacuous Generalization Bounds at the ImageNet Scale: a PAC-Bayesian Compression Approach · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Non-vacuous Generalization Bounds at the ImageNet Scale: a PAC-Bayesian Compression Approach · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds
non-vacuous generalization bounds |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Non-vacuous Generalization Bounds at the ImageNet Scale: a PAC-Bayesian Compression Approach · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds
PAC-Bayes bounds |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Non-vacuous Generalization Bounds at the ImageNet Scale: a PAC-Bayesian Compression Approach · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › prior distribution
conjugate priors |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Construction of Nonparametric Bayesian Models from Parametric Bayes Equations · NIPS 2009 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
image segmentation |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Nonparametric Bayesian Image Segmentation · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2008 |
Image and video processing
image segmentation |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Smooth Image Segmentation by Nonparametric Bayesian Inference · ECCV (1) 2006 |
Information theory › information measures › entropy
maximum entropy |
0.0 | 1 | 2007 | Cluster analysis of heterogeneous rank data · ICML 2007 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
variational monte carlo · 1.7space group equivariance · 1.7normalizing flow · 1.7group averaging · 1.7finite state machine · 1.7differentiable nonlinear mechanics simulation · 1.7data augmentation · 1.7canonicalization · 1.7automatic vectorization · 1.7JAX vmap · 1.7polynomial-time mapping · 0.7graph pencil method · 0.7mixture model · 0.1maximum entropy · 0.1EM algorithm · 0.1nonparametric bayesian inference · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Designing Mechanical Meta-Materials by Learning Equivariant FlowsabstractMechanical meta-materials are solids whose geometric structure results in exotic nonlinear behaviors that are not typically achievable via homogeneous materials. We show how to drastically expand the design space of a class of mechanical meta-materials known as $\textit{cellular solids}$, by generalizing beyond translational symmetry. This is made possible by transforming a reference geometry according to a divergence free flow that is parameterized by a neural network and equivariant under the relevant symmetry group. We show how to construct flows equivariant to the space groups, despite the fact that these groups are not compact. Coupling this flow with a differentiable nonlinear mechanics simulator allows us to represent a much richer set of cellular solids than was previously possible. These materials can be optimized to exhibit desirable mechanical properties such as negative Poisson's ratios or to match target stress-strain curves. We validate these new designs in simulation and by fabricating real-world prototypes. We find that designs with higher-order symmetries can exhibit a wider range of behaviors. Mehran Mirramezani, Anne S. Meeussen, Katia Bertoldi, Peter Orbanz, Ryan P. Adams |
ICLR | 4 |
| 2025 | Efficiently Vectorized MCMC on Modern AcceleratorsabstractWith the advent of automatic vectorization tools (e.g., JAX’s vmap), writing multi-chain MCMC algorithms is often now as simple as invoking those tools on single-chain code. Whilst convenient, for various MCMC algorithms this results in a synchronization problem—loosely speaking, at each iteration all chains running in parallel must wait until the last chain has finished drawing its sample. In this work, we show how to design single-chain MCMC algorithms in a way that avoids synchronization overheads when vectorizing with tools like vmap, by using the framework of finite state machines (FSMs). Using a simplified model, we derive an exact theoretical form of the obtainable speed-ups using our approach, and use it to make principled recommendations for optimal algorithm design. We implement several popular MCMC algorithms as FSMs, including Elliptical Slice Sampling, HMC-NUTS, and Delayed Rejection, demonstrating speed-ups of up to an order of magnitude in experiments. Hugh Dance, Pierre Glaser, Peter Orbanz, Ryan P. Adams |
ICML | 3 |
| 2025 | Diagonal Symmetrization of Neural Network Solvers for the Many-Electron Schrödinger EquationabstractIncorporating group symmetries into neural networks has been a cornerstone of success in many AI-for-science applications. Diagonal groups of isometries, which describe the invariance under a simultaneous movement of multiple objects, arise naturally in many-body quantum problems. Despite their importance, diagonal groups have received relatively little attention, as they lack a natural choice of invariant maps except in special cases. We study different ways of incorporating diagonal invariance in neural network ansatze trained via variational Monte Carlo methods, and consider specifically data augmentation, group averaging and canonicalization. We show that, contrary to standard ML setups, in-training symmetrization destabilizes training and can lead to worse performance. Our theoretical and numerical results indicate that this unexpected behavior may arise from a unique computational-statistical tradeoff not found in standard ML analyses of symmetrization. Meanwhile, we demonstrate that post hoc averaging is less sensitive to such tradeoffs and emerges as a simple, flexible and effective method for improving neural network solvers. Kevin Han Huang, Ni Zhan 0001, Elif Ertekin, Peter Orbanz, Ryan P. Adams |
ICML | 4 |
| 2025 | Distinguishing Cause from Effect with Causal Velocity ModelsabstractBivariate structural causal models (SCM) are often used to infer causal direction by examining their goodness-of-fit under restricted model classes. In this paper, we describe a parametrization of bivariate SCMs in terms of a causal velocity by viewing the cause variable as time in a dynamical system. The velocity implicitly defines counterfactual curves via the solution of initial value problems where the observation specifies the initial condition. Using tools from measure transport, we obtain a unique correspondence between SCMs and the score function of the generated distribution via its causal velocity. Based on this, we derive an objective function that directly regresses the velocity against the score function, the latter of which can be estimated non-parametrically from observational data. We use this to develop a method for bivariate causal discovery that extends beyond known model classes such as additive or location-scale noise, and that requires no assumptions on the noise distributions. When the score is estimated well, the objective is also useful for detecting model non–identifiability and misspecification. We present positive results in simulation and benchmark experiments where many existing methods fail, and perform ablation studies to examine the method’s sensitivity to accurate score estimation. Johnny Xi, Hugh Dance, Peter Orbanz, Benjamin Bloem-Reddy |
ICML | 3 |
| 2023 | The Graph Pencil Method: Mapping Subgraph Densities to Stochastic Block ModelsabstractIn this work, we describe a method that determines an exact map from a finite set of subgraph densities to the parameters of a stochastic block model (SBM) matching these densities. Given a number K of blocks, the subgraph densities of a finite number of stars and bistars uniquely determines a single element of the class of all degree-separated stochastic block models with K blocks. Our method makes it possible to translate estimates of these subgraph densities into model parameters, and hence to use subgraph densities directly for inference. The computational overhead is negligible; computing the translation map is polynomial in K, but independent of the graph size once the subgraph densities are given. Lee M. Gunderson, Gecia Bravo Hermsdorff, Peter Orbanz |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2019 | Empirical Risk Minimization and Stochastic Gradient Descent for Relational DataabstractEmpirical risk minimization is the main tool for prediction problems, but its extension to relational data remains unsolved. We solve this problem using recent ideas from graph sampling theory to (i) define an empirical risk for relational data and (ii) obtain stochastic gradients for this empirical risk that are automatically unbiased. This is achieved by considering the method by which data is sampled from a graph as an explicit component of model design. By integrating fast implementations of graph sampling schemes with standard automatic differentiation tools, we provide an efficient turnkey solver for the risk minimization problem. We establish basic theoretical properties of the procedure. Finally, we demonstrate relational ERM with application to two non-standard problems: one-stage training for semi-supervised node classification, and learning embedding vectors for vertex attributes. Experiments confirm that the turnkey inference procedure is effective in practice, and that the sampling scheme used for model specification has a strong effect on model performance. Victor Veitch, Morgane Austern, Wenda Zhou, David M. Blei, Peter Orbanz |
AISTATS | 5 |
| 2019 | Non-vacuous Generalization Bounds at the ImageNet Scale: a PAC-Bayesian Compression Approach
Wenda Zhou, Victor Veitch, Morgane Austern, Ryan P. Adams, Peter Orbanz |
ICLR (Poster) | 5 |
| 2015 | Bayesian Models of Graphs, Arrays and Other Exchangeable Random StructuresabstractThe natural habitat of most Bayesian methods is data represented by exchangeable sequences of observations, for which de Finetti's theorem provides the theoretical foundation. Dirichlet process clustering, Gaussian process regression, and many other parametric and nonparametric Bayesian models fall within the remit of this framework; many problems arising in modern data analysis do not. This article provides an introduction to Bayesian models of graphs, matrices, and other data that can be modeled by random structures. We describe results in probability theory that generalize de Finetti's theorem to such data and discuss their relevance to nonparametric Bayesian modeling. With the basic ideas in place, we survey example models available in the literature; applications of such models include collaborative filtering, link prediction, and graph and network analysis. We also highlight connections to recent developments in graph theory and probability, and sketch the more general mathematical foundation of Bayesian methods for other types of data beyond sequences and arrays. Peter Orbanz, Daniel M. Roy 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 1 |
| 2012 | Random function priors for exchangeable arrays with applications to graphs and relational dataabstractA fundamental problem in the analysis of structured relational data like graphs, networks, databases, and matrices is to extract a summary of the common struc- ture underlying relations between individual entities. Relational data are typically encoded in the form of arrays; invariance to the ordering of rows and columns corresponds to exchangeable arrays. Results in probability theory due to Aldous, Hoover and Kallenberg show that exchangeable arrays can be represented in terms of a random measurable function which constitutes the natural model parameter in a Bayesian model. We obtain a flexible yet simple Bayesian nonparametric model by placing a Gaussian process prior on the parameter function. Efficient inference utilises elliptical slice sampling combined with a random sparse approximation to the Gaussian process. We demonstrate applications of the model to network data and clarify its relation to models in the literature, several of which emerge as special cases. James Robert Lloyd, Peter Orbanz, Zoubin Ghahramani, Daniel M. Roy 0001 |
NIPS | 2 |
| 2009 | Construction of Nonparametric Bayesian Models from Parametric Bayes EquationsabstractWe consider the general problem of constructing nonparametric Bayesian models on infinite-dimensional random objects, such as functions, infinite graphs or infinite permutations. The problem has generated much interest in machine learning, where it is treated heuristically, but has not been studied in full generality in nonparametric Bayesian statistics, which tends to focus on models over probability distributions. Our approach applies a standard tool of stochastic process theory, the construction of stochastic processes from their finite-dimensional marginal distributions. The main contribution of the paper is a generalization of the classic Kolmogorov extension theorem to conditional probabilities. This extension allows a rigorous construction of nonparametric Bayesian models from systems of finite-dimensional, parametric Bayes equations. Using this approach, we show (i) how existence of a conjugate posterior for the nonparametric model can be guaranteed by choosing conjugate finite-dimensional models in the construction, (ii) how the mapping to the posterior parameters of the nonparametric model can be explicitly determined, and (iii) that the construction of conjugate models in essence requires the finite-dimensional models to be in the exponential family. As an application of our constructive framework, we derive a model on infinite permutations, the nonparametric Bayesian analogue of a model recently proposed for the analysis of rank data. Peter Orbanz |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2008 | Music preference learning with partial informationabstractWe consider the problem of online learning in a changing environment under sparse user feedback. Specifically, we address the classification of music types according to a user's preferences for a hearing aid application. The classifier, operating under limited computational resources, must be capable of adjusting to types of data not represented in the training set, and to changing user demands. The user provides feedback only occasionally, prompting the classifier to change its state. We propose an online learning algorithm capable of incorporating information from unlabeled data by a semi-supervised strategy, and demonstrate that the use of unlabeled examples significantly improves classification performance if the ratio of labeled points is small. Yvonne Moh, Peter Orbanz, Joachim M. Buhmann |
ICASSP | 2 |
| 2008 | Nonparametric Bayesian Image Segmentation
Peter Orbanz, Joachim M. Buhmann |
Int. J. Comput. Vis. | 1 |
| 2007 | Cluster analysis of heterogeneous rank dataabstractCluster analysis of ranking data, which occurs in consumer questionnaires, voting forms or other inquiries of preferences, attempts to identify typical groups of rank choices.Empirically measured rankings are often incomplete, i.e. different numbers of filled rank positions cause heterogeneity in the data.We propose a mixture approach for clustering of heterogeneous rank data.Rankings of different lengths can be described and compared by means of a single probabilistic model.A maximum entropy approach avoids hidden assumptions about missing rank positions.Parameter estimators and an efficient EM algorithm for unsupervised inference are derived for the ranking mixture model.Experiments on both synthetic data and realworld data demonstrate parameter estimates on heterogeneous data when the incomplete rankings are included in the inference process. Ludwig M. Busse, Peter Orbanz, Joachim M. Buhmann |
ICML | 2 |
| 2006 | Smooth Image Segmentation by Nonparametric Bayesian Inference
Peter Orbanz, Joachim M. Buhmann |
ECCV (1) | 1 |
| 2005 | SAR images as mixtures of Gaussian mixturesabstractWe consider the problem of image segmentation by clustering local histograms with parametric mixture-of-mixture models. These models represent each cluster by a single mixture model of simple parametric components, typically truncated Gaussians. Clustering requires unsupervised inference of the model parameters, for which we derive a nested variant of the EM algorithm. This learning procedure is designed to deal with the large number of hidden variables required by the model. Results are presented for application of the algorithm to unsupervised segmentation of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images. Peter Orbanz, Joachim M. Buhmann |
ICIP (2) | 1 |