Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nicole A. Wishart

dblp:68/6212 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Requirements engineering and software design · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design › database design
conceptual data modeling
0.012004
Comparing a rule-based approach with a pattern-based approach at different levels of complexity of conceptual data modelling tasks · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2004
Requirements engineering and software design
database design
0.012004
Comparing a rule-based approach with a pattern-based approach at different levels of complexity of conceptual data modelling tasks · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2004
Requirements engineering and software design
software design methodology
0.012004
Comparing a rule-based approach with a pattern-based approach at different levels of complexity of conceptual data modelling tasks · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2004

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

rule-based modeling · 0.0pattern-based modeling · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Novice Designer Performance Comparison Between the Entity Relationship Event Network and the Event-Based Logical Relational Design Techniques
abstract
Previous information systems (IS) research has established that novice database designers experience cognitive overload when faced with many interacting entities in modeling relationships. The authors contend that this problem occurs mainly when events are involved. Results of an initial study provide support that novice database designers indeed have difficulty recognizing and modeling events. They propose two techniques that can address the difficulties encountered by novices when modeling events using the entity-relationship model. Entity-relationship event network (EREN) is a top-down and template-driven technique. Event-based logical relational design (ELRD) is a bottom-up and heuristic-driven technique. Employing the cognitive load theory (CLT) to guide the hypotheses, the authors compare the usability of EREN and ELRD for novice designers. Results indicate that both techniques facilitate satisfactory designer performance when modeling events. Overall, the ELRD technique leads to better designer performance. There is an interaction effect between technique and task complexity as the significant performance advantage of ELRD at the lower-complexity task gets mitigated at the higher-complexity task. The two techniques do not differ significantly on the constructs of behavioral intention to use, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and self-efficacy. Overall, the ELRD technique is recommended for modeling events.
Dinesh Batra, Nicole A. Wishart
J. Database Manag.2
2004 Comparing a rule-based approach with a pattern-based approach at different levels of complexity of conceptual data modelling tasks
Dinesh Batra, Nicole A. Wishart
Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud.2