Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
David Ochoa
dblp:68/8090
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-1857-278XORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 7 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
5 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
drug discovery |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | Lit-OTAR framework for extracting biological evidences from literature · Bioinform. 2025 Associations on the Fly, a new feature aiming to facilitate exploration of the Open Targets Platform evidence · Bioinform. 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
biomedical text mining |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Lit-OTAR framework for extracting biological evidences from literature · Bioinform. 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biomedical text mining
entity normalization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Lit-OTAR framework for extracting biological evidences from literature · Bioinform. 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biomedical text mining
named entity recognition |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Lit-OTAR framework for extracting biological evidences from literature · Bioinform. 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › drug discovery
target identification |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Associations on the Fly, a new feature aiming to facilitate exploration of the Open Targets Platform evidence · Bioinform. 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular evolution
coevolution analysis |
0.3 | 2 | 2015 | Detection of significant protein coevolution · Bioinform. 2015 Studying the co-evolution of protein families with the Mirrortree web server · Bioinform. 2010 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
benchmarking of computational methods |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Benchmarking substrate-based kinase activity inference using phosphoproteomic data · Bioinform. 2017 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics › phosphoproteomics
kinase activity inference |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Benchmarking substrate-based kinase activity inference using phosphoproteomic data · Bioinform. 2017 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics › phosphoproteomics
phosphoproteomics analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Benchmarking substrate-based kinase activity inference using phosphoproteomic data · Bioinform. 2017 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › drug discovery
target prioritization |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Associations on the Fly, a new feature aiming to facilitate exploration of the Open Targets Platform evidence · Bioinform. 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein-protein interaction prediction
coevolution-based interaction prediction |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Detection of significant protein coevolution · Bioinform. 2015 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein-protein interaction prediction |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Detection of significant protein coevolution · Bioinform. 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
named entity recognition · 0.9evidence weighting · 0.9entity normalization · 0.9deep learning · 0.9GraphQL · 0.9wilcoxon rank sum test · 0.3multiple linear regression · 0.3kolmogorov-smirnov test · 0.3gene set enrichment analysis · 0.3mirrortree · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Associations on the Fly, a new feature aiming to facilitate exploration of the Open Targets Platform evidenceabstractMOTIVATION: The Open Targets Platform (https://platform.opentargets.org) is a unique, comprehensive, open-source resource supporting systematic identification and prioritisation of targets for drug discovery. The Platform combines, harmonizes and integrates data from >20 diverse sources to provide target-disease associations, covering evidence derived from genetic associations, somatic mutations, known drugs, differential expression, animal models, pathways and systems biology. An in-house target identification scoring framework weighs the evidence from each data source and type, contributing to an overall score for each of the 7.8M target-disease associations. However, the old infrastructure did not allow user-led dynamic adjustments in the contribution of different evidence types for target prioritisation, a limitation frequently raised by our user community. Furthermore, the previous Platform user interface did not support navigation and exploration of the underlying target-disease evidence on the same page, occasionally making the user journey counterintuitive. RESULTS: Here, we describe 'Associations on the Fly' (AOTF), a new Platform feature-developed with a user-centred vision-that enables the user to formulate more flexible therapeutic hypotheses through dynamic adjustment of the weight of contributing evidence from each source, altering the prioritisation of targets. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The codebases that power the Platform-including our pipelines, GraphQL API, and React UI-are all open source and licensed under the APACHE LICENSE, VERSION 2.0. You can find all of our code repositories on GitHub at https://github.com/opentargets and on Zenodo at https://zenodo.org/records/14392214. This tool was implemented using React v18 and its code is accessible here: (https://github.com/opentargets/ot-ui-apps). The tools are accessible through the Open Targets Platform web interface (https://platform.opentargets.org/) and GraphQL API (https://platform-docs.opentargets.org/data-access/graphql-api). Data is available for download here: (https://platform.opentargets.org/downloads) and from the EMBL-EBI FTP: (https://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/opentargets/platform/). Carlos Cruz-Castillo, Luca Fumis, Chintan Mehta, Ricardo Esteban Martinez Osorio, Juan María Roldán-Romero, Helena Cornu, Prashant Uniyal, Antonio Solano-Román, Miguel Carmona, David Ochoa, Ellen M. McDonagh, Annalisa Buniello |
Bioinform. | 10 |
| 2025 | Lit-OTAR framework for extracting biological evidences from literatureabstractSUMMARY: The lit-OTAR framework, developed through a collaboration between Europe PMC and Open Targets, leverages deep learning to revolutionize drug discovery by extracting evidence from scientific literature for drug target identification and validation. This novel framework combines named entity recognition for identifying gene/protein (target), disease, organism, and chemical/drug within scientific texts, and entity normalization to map these entities to databases like Ensembl, Experimental Factor Ontology, and ChEMBL. Continuously operational, it has processed over 39 million abstracts and 4.5 million full-text articles and preprints to date, identifying more than 48.5 million unique associations that significantly help accelerate the drug discovery process and scientific research >29.9 m distinct target-disease, 11.8 m distinct target-drug, and 8.3 m distinct disease-drug relationships. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The results are accessible through Europe PMC's SciLite web app (https://europepmc.org/) and its annotations API (https://europepmc.org/annotationsapi), as well as via the Open Targets Platform (https://platform.opentargets.org/). The daily pipeline is available at https://github.com/ML4LitS/otar-maintenance, and the Open Targets ETL processes are available at https://github.com/opentargets. Santosh Tirunagari, Shyamasree Saha, Aravind Venkatesan, Daniel Suveges, Miguel Carmona, Annalisa Buniello, David Ochoa, Johanna R. McEntyre, Ellen M. McDonagh, Melissa Harrison |
Bioinform. | 7 |
| 2017 | Benchmarking substrate-based kinase activity inference using phosphoproteomic dataabstractMOTIVATION: Phosphoproteomic experiments are increasingly used to study the changes in signaling occurring across different conditions. It has been proposed that changes in phosphorylation of kinase target sites can be used to infer when a kinase activity is under regulation. However, these approaches have not yet been benchmarked due to a lack of appropriate benchmarking strategies. RESULTS: We used curated phosphoproteomic experiments and a gold standard dataset containing a total of 184 kinase-condition pairs where regulation is expected to occur to benchmark and compare different kinase activity inference strategies: Z-test, Kolmogorov Smirnov test, Wilcoxon rank sum test, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA), and a multiple linear regression model. We also tested weighted variants of the Z-test and GSEA that include information on kinase sequence specificity as proxy for affinity. Finally, we tested how the number of known substrates and the type of evidence ( in vivo , in vitro or in silico ) supporting these influence the predictions. CONCLUSIONS: Most models performed well with the Z-test and the GSEA performing best as determined by the area under the ROC curve (Mean AUC = 0.722). Weighting kinase targets by the kinase target sequence preference improves the results marginally. However, the number of known substrates and the evidence supporting the interactions has a strong effect on the predictions. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The KSEA implementation is available in https://github.com/ evocellnet/ksea. Additional data is available in http://phosfate.com. CONTACT: [email protected] or [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Claudia Hernandez-Armenta, David Ochoa, Emanuel J. V. Gonçalves, Julio Saez-Rodriguez, Pedro Beltrão |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2017 | Systematic Analysis of Transcriptional and Post-transcriptional Regulation of Metabolism in YeastabstractCells react to extracellular perturbations with complex and intertwined responses. Systematic identification of the regulatory mechanisms that control these responses is still a challenge and requires tailored analyses integrating different types of molecular data. Here we acquired time-resolved metabolomics measurements in yeast under salt and pheromone stimulation and developed a machine learning approach to explore regulatory associations between metabolism and signal transduction. Existing phosphoproteomics measurements under the same conditions and kinase-substrate regulatory interactions were used to in silico estimate the enzymatic activity of signalling kinases. Our approach identified informative associations between kinases and metabolic enzymes capable of predicting metabolic changes. We extended our analysis to two studies containing transcriptomics, phosphoproteomics and metabolomics measurements across a comprehensive panel of kinases/phosphatases knockouts and time-resolved perturbations to the nitrogen metabolism. Changes in activity of transcription factors, kinases and phosphatases were estimated in silico and these were capable of building predictive models to infer the metabolic adaptations of previously unseen conditions across different dynamic experiments. Time-resolved experiments were significantly more informative than genetic perturbations to infer metabolic adaptation. This difference may be due to the indirect nature of the associations and of general cellular states that can hinder the identification of causal relationships. This work provides a novel genome-scale integrative analysis to propose putative transcriptional and post-translational regulatory mechanisms of metabolic processes. Emanuel J. V. Gonçalves, Zrinka Raguz Nakic, Mattia Zampieri, Omar Wagih, David Ochoa, Uwe Sauer, Pedro Beltrão, Julio Saez-Rodriguez |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 5 |
| 2015 | Detection of significant protein coevolutionabstractMOTIVATION: The evolution of proteins cannot be fully understood without taking into account the coevolutionary linkages entangling them. From a practical point of view, coevolution between protein families has been used as a way of detecting protein interactions and functional relationships from genomic information. The most common approach to inferring protein coevolution involves the quantification of phylogenetic tree similarity using a family of methodologies termed mirrortree. In spite of their success, a fundamental problem of these approaches is the lack of an adequate statistical framework to assess the significance of a given coevolutionary score (tree similarity). As a consequence, a number of ad hoc filters and arbitrary thresholds are required in an attempt to obtain a final set of confident coevolutionary signals. RESULTS: In this work, we developed a method for associating confidence estimators (P values) to the tree-similarity scores, using a null model specifically designed for the tree comparison problem. We show how this approach largely improves the quality and coverage (number of pairs that can be evaluated) of the detected coevolution in all the stages of the mirrortree workflow, independently of the starting genomic information. This not only leads to a better understanding of protein coevolution and its biological implications, but also to obtain a highly reliable and comprehensive network of predicted interactions, as well as information on the substructure of macromolecular complexes using only genomic information. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The software and datasets used in this work are freely available at: http://csbg.cnb.csic.es/pMT/. CONTACT: [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. David Ochoa, David de Juan, Alfonso Valencia, Florencio Pazos |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2011 | Selection of organisms for the co-evolution-based study of protein interactionsabstractBACKGROUND: The prediction and study of protein interactions and functional relationships based on similarity of phylogenetic trees, exemplified by the mirrortree and related methodologies, is being widely used. Although dependence between the performance of these methods and the set of organisms used to build the trees was suspected, so far nobody assessed it in an exhaustive way, and, in general, previous works used as many organisms as possible. In this work we asses the effect of using different sets of organism (chosen according with various phylogenetic criteria) on the performance of this methodology in detecting protein interactions of different nature. RESULTS: We show that the performance of three mirrortree-related methodologies depends on the set of organisms used for building the trees, and it is not always directly related to the number of organisms in a simple way. Certain subsets of organisms seem to be more suitable for the predictions of certain types of interactions. This relationship between type of interaction and optimal set of organism for detecting them makes sense in the light of the phylogenetic distribution of the organisms and the nature of the interactions. CONCLUSIONS: In order to obtain an optimal performance when predicting protein interactions, it is recommended to use different sets of organisms depending on the available computational resources and data, as well as the type of interactions of interest. Dorota Herman, David Ochoa, David de Juan, Daniel Lopez, Alfonso Valencia, Florencio Pazos |
BMC Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2010 | Studying the co-evolution of protein families with the Mirrortree web serverabstractSUMMARY: The Mirrortree server allows to graphically and interactively study the co-evolution of two protein families, and investigate their possible interactions and functional relationships in a taxonomic context. The server includes the possibility of starting from single sequences and hence it can be used by non-expert users. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The web server is freely available at http://csbg.cnb.csic.es/mtserver. It was tested in the main web browsers. Adobe Flash Player is required at the client side to perform the interactive assessment of co-evolution. CONTACT: [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. David Ochoa, Florencio Pazos |
Bioinform. | 1 |