Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Chandramouli Chandrasekaran
dblp:69/10993
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-1711-590XORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › single-cell analysis › cell type annotation
cell type classification |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | In vivo cell-type and brain region classification via multimodal contrastive learning · ICLR 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience
neuroinformatics |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | In vivo cell-type and brain region classification via multimodal contrastive learning · ICLR 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
computational neuroscience |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | A mechanistic multi-area recurrent network model of decision-making · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | In vivo cell-type and brain region classification via multimodal contrastive learning · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › contrastive learning
multimodal contrastive learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | In vivo cell-type and brain region classification via multimodal contrastive learning · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
supervised fine-tuning · 1.7multimodal contrastive learning · 1.7recurrent neural network · 0.5dale's law · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | In vivo cell-type and brain region classification via multimodal contrastive learningabstractCurrent electrophysiological approaches can track the activity of many neurons, yet it is usually unknown which cell-types or brain areas are being recorded without further molecular or histological analysis. Developing accurate and scalable algorithms for identifying the cell-type and brain region of recorded neurons is thus crucial for improving our understanding of neural computation. In this work, we develop a multimodal contrastive learning approach for neural data that can be fine-tuned for different downstream tasks, including inference of cell-type and brain location. We utilize multimodal contrastive learning to jointly embed the activity autocorrelations and extracellular waveforms of individual neurons. We demonstrate that our embedding approach, Neuronal Embeddings via MultimOdal Contrastive Learning (NEMO), paired with supervised fine-tuning, achieves state-of-the-art cell-type classification for two opto-tagged datasets and brain region classification for the public International Brain Laboratory Brain-wide Map dataset. Our method represents a promising step towards accurate cell-type and brain region classification from electrophysiological recordings. Hanrui Lyu, YiXun Xu, Charles Windolf, Eric Kenji Lee, Andrew M. Shelton, Olivier Winter, Eva L. Dyer, Chandramouli Chandrasekaran, Nicholas A. Steinmetz, Liam Paninski, Cole L. Hurwitz |
ICLR | 11 |
| 2021 | A mechanistic multi-area recurrent network model of decision-makingabstractRecurrent neural networks (RNNs) trained on neuroscience-based tasks have been widely used as models for cortical areas performing analogous tasks. However, very few tasks involve a single cortical area, and instead require the coordination of multiple brain areas. Despite the importance of multi-area computation, there is a limited understanding of the principles underlying such computation. We propose to use multi-area RNNs with neuroscience-inspired architecture constraints to derive key features of multi-area computation. In particular, we show that incorporating multiple areas and Dale's Law is critical for biasing the networks to learn biologically plausible solutions. Additionally, we leverage the full observability of the RNNs to show that output-relevant information is preferentially propagated between areas. These results suggest that cortex uses modular computation to generate minimal sufficient representations of task information. More broadly, our results suggest that constrained multi-area RNNs can produce experimentally testable hypotheses for computations that occur within and across multiple brain areas, enabling new insights into distributed computation in neural systems. Michael Kleinman, Chandramouli Chandrasekaran, Jonathan C. Kao |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2011 | Monkeys and Humans Share a Common Computation for Face/Voice IntegrationabstractSpeech production involves the movement of the mouth and other regions of the face resulting in visual motion cues. These visual cues enhance intelligibility and detection of auditory speech. As such, face-to-face speech is fundamentally a multisensory phenomenon. If speech is fundamentally multisensory, it should be reflected in the evolution of vocal communication: similar behavioral effects should be observed in other primates. Old World monkeys share with humans vocal production biomechanics and communicate face-to-face with vocalizations. It is unknown, however, if they, too, combine faces and voices to enhance their perception of vocalizations. We show that they do: monkeys combine faces and voices in noisy environments to enhance their detection of vocalizations. Their behavior parallels that of humans performing an identical task. We explored what common computational mechanism(s) could explain the pattern of results we observed across species. Standard explanations or models such as the principle of inverse effectiveness and a "race" model failed to account for their behavior patterns. Conversely, a "superposition model", positing the linear summation of activity patterns in response to visual and auditory components of vocalizations, served as a straightforward but powerful explanatory mechanism for the observed behaviors in both species. As such, it represents a putative homologous mechanism for integrating faces and voices across primates. Chandramouli Chandrasekaran, Luis Lemus, Andrea Trubanova, Matthias Gondan, Asif A. Ghazanfar |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 1 |
| 2009 | The Natural Statistics of Audiovisual SpeechabstractHumans, like other animals, are exposed to a continuous stream of signals, which are dynamic, multimodal, extended, and time varying in nature. This complex input space must be transduced and sampled by our sensory systems and transmitted to the brain where it can guide the selection of appropriate actions. To simplify this process, it's been suggested that the brain exploits statistical regularities in the stimulus space. Tests of this idea have largely been confined to unimodal signals and natural scenes. One important class of multisensory signals for which a quantitative input space characterization is unavailable is human speech. We do not understand what signals our brain has to actively piece together from an audiovisual speech stream to arrive at a percept versus what is already embedded in the signal structure of the stream itself. In essence, we do not have a clear understanding of the natural statistics of audiovisual speech. In the present study, we identified the following major statistical features of audiovisual speech. First, we observed robust correlations and close temporal correspondence between the area of the mouth opening and the acoustic envelope. Second, we found the strongest correlation between the area of the mouth opening and vocal tract resonances. Third, we observed that both area of the mouth opening and the voice envelope are temporally modulated in the 2-7 Hz frequency range. Finally, we show that the timing of mouth movements relative to the onset of the voice is consistently between 100 and 300 ms. We interpret these data in the context of recent neural theories of speech which suggest that speech communication is a reciprocally coupled, multisensory event, whereby the outputs of the signaler are matched to the neural processes of the receiver. Chandramouli Chandrasekaran, Andrea Trubanova, Sébastien Stillittano, Alice Caplier, Asif A. Ghazanfar |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 1 |